BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jonathan D. Cohen

Jonathan D. Cohen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningNeurons and CognitionComputation and LanguageInformation RetrievalProgramming Languages

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Thematic Working Group 5 -- Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy for teaching and learning: design and implementation

TWG 5 focused on developing and implementing effective strategies for enhancing AI literacy and agency of teachers, equipping them with the knowledge and skills necessary to integrate AI into their teaching practices. Explorations covered curriculum design, professional development programs, practical classroom applications, and policy guidelines aiming to empower educators to confidently utilize AI tools and foster a deeper understanding of AI concepts among students.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Visual serial processing deficits explain divergences in human and VLM reasoning

Why do Vision Language Models (VLMs), despite success on standard benchmarks, often fail to match human performance on surprisingly simple visual reasoning tasks? While the underlying computational principles are still debated, we hypothesize that a crucial factor is a deficit in visually-grounded serial processing. To test this hypothesis, we compared human and VLM performance across tasks designed to vary serial processing demands in three distinct domains: geometric reasoning, perceptual enumeration, and mental rotation. Tasks within each domain varied serial processing load by manipulating factors such as geometric concept complexity, perceptual individuation load, and transformation difficulty. Across all domains, our results revealed a consistent pattern: decreased VLM accuracy was strongly correlated with increased human reaction time (used as a proxy for serial processing load). As tasks require more demanding serial processing -- whether composing concepts, enumerating items, or performing mental transformations -- the VLM-human performance gap widens reliably. These findings support our hypothesis, indicating that limitations in serial, visually grounded reasoning represent a fundamental bottleneck that distinguishes current VLMs from humans.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Distill: Domain-Specific Compilation for Cognitive Models

This paper discusses our proposal and implementation of Distill, a domain-specific compilation tool based on LLVM to accelerate cognitive models. Cognitive models explain the process of cognitive function and offer a path to human-like artificial intelligence. However, cognitive modeling is laborious, requiring composition of many types of computational tasks, and suffers from poor performance as it relies on high-level languages like Python. In order to continue enjoying the flexibility of Python while achieving high performance, Distill uses domain-specific knowledge to compile Python-based cognitive models into LLVM IR, carefully stripping away features like dynamic typing and memory management that add overheads to the actual model. As we show, this permits significantly faster model execution. We also show that the code so generated enables using classical compiler data flow analysis passes to reveal properties about data flow in cognitive models that are useful to cognitive scientists. Distill is publicly available, is being used by researchers in cognitive science, and has led to patches that are currently being evaluated for integration into mainline LLVM.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Modularity benefits reinforcement learning agents with competing homeostatic drives

The problem of balancing conflicting needs is fundamental to intelligence. Standard reinforcement learning algorithms maximize a scalar reward, which requires combining different objective-specific rewards into a single number. Alternatively, different objectives could also be combined at the level of action value, such that specialist modules responsible for different objectives submit different action suggestions to a decision process, each based on rewards that are independent of one another. In this work, we explore the potential benefits of this alternative strategy. We investigate a biologically relevant multi-objective problem, the continual homeostasis of a set of variables, and compare a monolithic deep Q-network to a modular network with a dedicated Q-learner for each variable. We find that the modular agent: a) requires minimal exogenously determined exploration; b) has improved sample efficiency; and c) is more robust to out-of-domain perturbation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Human Inference in Changing Environments With Temporal Structure

To make informed decisions in natural environments that change over time, humans must update their beliefs as new observations are gathered. Studies exploring human inference as a dynamical process that unfolds in time have focused on situations in which the statistics of observations are history-independent. Yet temporal structure is everywhere in nature, and yields history-dependent observations. Do humans modify their inference processes depending on the latent temporal statistics of their observations? We investigate this question experimentally and theoretically using a change-point inference task. We show that humans adapt their inference process to fine aspects of the temporal structure in the statistics of stimuli. As such, humans behave qualitatively in a Bayesian fashion, but, quantitatively, deviate away from optimality. Perhaps more importantly, humans behave suboptimally in that their responses are not deterministic, but variable. We show that this variability itself is modulated by the temporal statistics of stimuli. To elucidate the cognitive algorithm that yields this behavior, we investigate a broad array of existing and new models that characterize different sources of suboptimal deviations away from Bayesian inference. While models with 'output noise' that corrupts the response-selection process are natural candidates, human behavior is best described by sampling-based inference models, in which the main ingredient is a compressed approximation of the posterior, represented through a modest set of random samples and updated over time. This result comes to complement a growing literature on sample-based representation and learning in humans.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Navigating the Trade-Off between Multi-Task Learning and Learning to Multitask in Deep Neural Networks

The terms multi-task learning and multitasking are easily confused. Multi-task learning refers to a paradigm in machine learning in which a network is trained on various related tasks to facilitate the acquisition of tasks. In contrast, multitasking is used to indicate, especially in the cognitive science literature, the ability to execute multiple tasks simultaneously. While multi-task learning exploits the discovery of common structure between tasks in the form of shared representations, multitasking is promoted by separating representations between tasks to avoid processing interference. Here, we build on previous work involving shallow networks and simple task settings suggesting that there is a trade-off between multi-task learning and multitasking, mediated by the use of shared versus separated representations. We show that the same tension arises in deep networks and discuss a meta-learning algorithm for an agent to manage this trade-off in an unfamiliar environment. We display through different experiments that the agent is able to successfully optimize its training strategy as a function of the environment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Context Matters: Recovering Human Semantic Structure from Machine Learning Analysis of Large-Scale Text Corpora

Applying machine learning algorithms to large-scale, text-based corpora (embeddings) presents a unique opportunity to investigate at scale how human semantic knowledge is organized and how people use it to judge fundamental relationships, such as similarity between concepts. However, efforts to date have shown a substantial discrepancy between algorithm predictions and empirical judgments. Here, we introduce a novel approach of generating embeddings motivated by the psychological theory that semantic context plays a critical role in human judgments. Specifically, we train state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms using contextually-constrained text corpora and show that this greatly improves predictions of similarity judgments and feature ratings. By improving the correspondence between representations derived using embeddings generated by machine learning methods and empirical measurements of human judgments, the approach we describe helps advance the use of large-scale text corpora to understand the structure of human semantic representations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Efficiency of learning vs. processing: Towards a normative theory of multitasking

A striking limitation of human cognition is our inability to execute some tasks simultaneously. Recent work suggests that such limitations can arise from a fundamental tradeoff in network architectures that is driven by the sharing of representations between tasks: sharing promotes quicker learning, at the expense of interference while multitasking. From this perspective, multitasking failures might reflect a preference for learning efficiency over multitasking capability. We explore this hypothesis by formulating an ideal Bayesian agent that maximizes expected reward by learning either shared or separate representations for a task set. We investigate the agent's behavior and show that over a large space of parameters the agent sacrifices long-run optimality (higher multitasking capacity) for short-term reward (faster learning). Furthermore, we construct a general mathematical framework in which rational choices between learning speed and processing efficiency can be examined for a variety of different task environments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Efficiency of Human Cognition Reflects Planned Information Processing

Planning is useful. It lets people take actions that have desirable long-term consequences. But, planning is hard. It requires thinking about consequences, which consumes limited computational and cognitive resources. Thus, people should plan their actions, but they should also be smart about how they deploy resources used for planning their actions. Put another way, people should also "plan their plans". Here, we formulate this aspect of planning as a meta-reasoning problem and formalize it in terms of a recursive Bellman objective that incorporates both task rewards and information-theoretic planning costs. Our account makes quantitative predictions about how people should plan and meta-plan as a function of the overall structure of a task, which we test in two experiments with human participants. We find that people's reaction times reflect a planned use of information processing, consistent with our account. This formulation of planning to plan provides new insight into the function of hierarchical planning, state abstraction, and cognitive control in both humans and machines.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access