Source author record

Jonas Jankauskas

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

5works
3topics
4close collaborators

Published work

5 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Multi seasonal discrete time risk model revisited

In this work we set up the distribution function of M:=sup⁡n⩾1∑i=1n(Zi−1)\mathcal{M}:=\sup_{n\geqslant1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}{(Z_i-1)}, where the random walk ∑i=1nZi,n∈N,\sum_{i=1}^{n}Z_i, n\in\mathbb{N}, is generated by NN periodically occurring distributions and the integer-valued and non-negative random variables Z1, Z2, …Z_1,\,Z_2,\,\ldots are independent. The considered random walk generates so-called multi seasonal discrete time risk model, and a known distribution of random variable M\mathcal{M} enables to calculate ultimate time ruin or survival probability. Verifying obtained theoretical statements we demonstrate several computational examples for survival probability P(M<u)\mathbb{P}(\mathcal{M}< u) when N=2, 3N=2,\,3 or 1010.

preprint2022arXiv

On 2×2\mathbf{2\times2} determinants originating from survival probabilities in homogeneous discrete time risk model

We analyze 2×22\times 2 Hankel-like determinants DnD_n that arise in the initial values problem for the ultimate time survival probability φ(u)φ(u) in a homogeneous discrete time risk model W(n)=u+κn+∑i=1nZiW(n)=u+κn+\sum_{i=1}^nZ_i, where ZiZ_i are positive integer valued i.i.d. random claims, the initial surplus u∈N0u \in \mathbb{N}_0 and the income rate κ=2κ=2. We prove the asymptotic version of a recent conjecture on the non--vanishing and monotonicity of DnD_n and derive explicit formulas for the initial values φ(0)φ(0), φ(1)φ(1) of a recurrence that yields survival probabilities. In cases when ZiZ_i are Bernoulli or Geometrically distributed, the conjecture on DnD_n is shown to hold for all n∈N0n\in\mathbb{N}_0. Additionally, a generating function Ξ(s)Ξ(s) for ultimate survival probabilities φ(u)φ(u) is derived.

preprint2016arXiv

On Newman and Littlewood multiples of Borwein polynomials

A Newman polynomial has all the coefficients in {0,1}\{ 0,1\} and constant term 1, whereas a Littlewood polynomial has all coefficients in {−1,1}\{-1,1\}. We call P(X)∈Z[X]P(X)\in\mathbb{Z}[X] a Borwein polynomial if all its coefficients belong to {−1,0,1}\{ -1,0,1\} and P(0)≠0P(0)\neq 0. By exploiting an algorithm which decides whether a given monic integer polynomial with no roots on the unit circle ∣z∣=1|z|=1 has a non-zero multiple in Z[X]\mathbb{Z}[X] with coefficients in a finite set D⊂Z\mathcal{D} \subset \mathbb{Z}, for every Borwein polynomial of degree at most 9 we determine whether it divides any Littlewood or Newman polynomial. In particular, we show that every Borwein polynomial of degree at most 8 which divides some Newman polynomial divides some Littlewood polynomial as well. In addition to this, for every Newman polynomial of degree at most 11, we check whether it has a Littlewood multiple, extending the previous results of Borwein, Hare, Mossinghoff, Dubickas and Jankauskas.

preprint2014arXiv

There are no two non-real conjugates of a Pisot number with the same imaginary part

We show that the number α=(1+3+25)/2α=(1+\sqrt{3+2\sqrt{5}})/2 with minimal polynomial x4−2x3+x−1x^4-2x^3+x-1 is the only Pisot number whose four distinct conjugates α1,α2,α3,α4α_1,α_2,α_3,α_4 satisfy the additive relation α1+α2=α3+α4α_1+α_2=α_3+α_4. This implies that there exists no two non-real conjugates of a Pisot number with the same imaginary part and also that at most two conjugates of a Pisot number can have the same real part. On the other hand, we prove that similar four term equations α1=α2+α3+α4α_1 = α_2 + α_3+α_4 or α1+α2+α3+α4=0α_1 + α_2 + α_3 + α_4 =0 cannot be solved in conjugates of a Pisot number αα. We also show that the roots of the Siegel's polynomial x3−x−1x^3-x-1 are the only solutions to the three term equation α1+α2+α3=0α_1+α_2+α_3=0 in conjugates of a Pisot number. Finally, we prove that there exists no Pisot number whose conjugates satisfy the relation α1=α2+α3α_1=α_2+α_3.

preprint2012arXiv

On the equation f(g(x))=f(x)hm(x)f(g(x)) =f(x)h^m(x) for composite polynomials

In this paper we solve the equation f(g(x))=f(x)hm(x)f(g(x))=f(x)h^m(x) where f(x)f(x), g(x)g(x) and h(x)h(x) are unknown polynomials with coefficients in an arbitrary field KK, f(x)f(x) is non-constant and separable, °g≥2°g \geq 2, the polynomial g(x)g(x) has non-zero derivative g′(x)≠0g'(x) \ne 0 in K[x]K[x] and the integer m≥2m \geq 2 is not divisible by the characteristic of the field KK. We prove that this equation has no solutions if °f≥3°f \geq 3. If °f=2°f = 2, we prove that m=2m = 2 and give all solutions explicitly in terms of Chebyshev polynomials. The diophantine applications for such polynomials f(x)f(x), g(x)g(x), h(x)h(x) with coefficients in $\Q$ or Z\Z are considered in the context of the conjecture of Cassaign et. al on the values of Louiville's λλ function at points f(r)f(r), $r \in \Q$.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.