Researcher profile

John Hartley

John Hartley contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Formation Control for UAVs Using a Flux Guided Approach

Existing studies on formation control for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) have not considered encircling targets where an optimum coverage of the target is required at all times. Such coverage plays a critical role in many real-world applications such as tracking hostile UAVs. This paper proposes a new path planning approach called the Flux Guided (FG) method, which generates collision-free trajectories for multiple UAVs while maximising the coverage of target(s). Our method enables UAVs to track directly toward a target whilst maintaining maximum coverage. Furthermore, multiple scattered targets can be tracked by scaling the formation during flight. FG is highly scalable since it only requires communication between sub-set of UAVs on the open boundary of the formation's surface. Experimental results further validate that FG generates UAV trajectories $1.5 \times$ shorter than previous work and that trajectory planning for 9 leader/follower UAVs to surround a target in two different scenarios only requires 0.52 seconds and 0.88 seconds, respectively. The resulting trajectories are suitable for robotic controls after time-optimal parameterisation; we demonstrate this using a 3d dynamic particle system that tracks the desired trajectories using a PID controller.

preprint2022arXiv

Measuring Unintended Memorisation of Unique Private Features in Neural Networks

Neural networks pose a privacy risk to training data due to their propensity to memorise and leak information. Focusing on image classification, we show that neural networks also unintentionally memorise unique features even when they occur only once in training data. An example of a unique feature is a person's name that is accidentally present on a training image. Assuming access to the inputs and outputs of a trained model, the domain of the training data, and knowledge of unique features, we develop a score estimating the model's sensitivity to a unique feature by comparing the KL divergences of the model's output distributions given modified out-of-distribution images. Our results suggest that unique features are memorised by multi-layer perceptrons and convolutional neural networks trained on benchmark datasets, such as MNIST, Fashion-MNIST and CIFAR-10. We find that strategies to prevent overfitting (e.g.\ early stopping, regularisation, batch normalisation) do not prevent memorisation of unique features. These results imply that neural networks pose a privacy risk to rarely occurring private information. These risks can be more pronounced in healthcare applications if patient information is present in the training data.

preprint2022arXiv

Unintended memorisation of unique features in neural networks

Neural networks pose a privacy risk due to their propensity to memorise and leak training data. We show that unique features occurring only once in training data are memorised by discriminative multi-layer perceptrons and convolutional neural networks trained on benchmark imaging datasets. We design our method for settings where sensitive training data is not available, for example medical imaging. Our setting knows the unique feature, but not the training data, model weights or the unique feature's label. We develop a score estimating a model's sensitivity to a unique feature by comparing the KL divergences of the model's output distributions given modified out-of-distribution images. We find that typical strategies to prevent overfitting do not prevent unique feature memorisation. And that images containing a unique feature are highly influential, regardless of the influence the images's other features. We also find a significant variation in memorisation with training seed. These results imply that neural networks pose a privacy risk to rarely occurring private information. This risk is more pronounced in healthcare applications since sensitive patient information can be memorised when it remains in training data due to an imperfect data sanitisation process.