BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Joachim Spoerhase

Joachim Spoerhase appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational GeometryComputational ComplexityDiscrete Mathematics

Catalog footprint

What is connected

10works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Simplification of Polyline Bundles

We propose and study a generalization to the well-known problem of polyline simplification. Instead of a single polyline, we are given a set of $\ell$ polylines possibly sharing some line segments and bend points. Our goal is to minimize the number of bend points in the simplified bundle with respect to some error tolerance $δ$ (measuring Fréchet distance) but under the additional constraint that shared parts have to be simplified consistently. We show that polyline bundle simplification is NP-hard to approximate within a factor $n^{1/3 - \varepsilon}$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$ where $n$ is the number of bend points in the polyline bundle. This inapproximability even applies to instances with only $\ell=2$ polylines. However, we identify the sensitivity of the solution to the choice of $δ$ as a reason for this strong inapproximability. In particular, we prove that if we allow $δ$ to be exceeded by a factor of $2$ in our solution, we can find a simplified polyline bundle with no more than $O(\log (\ell + n)) \cdot OPT$ bend points in polytime, providing us with an efficient bi-criteria approximation. As a further result, we show fixed-parameter tractability in the number of shared bend points.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Colored Non-Crossing Euclidean Steiner Forest

Given a set of $k$-colored points in the plane, we consider the problem of finding $k$ trees such that each tree connects all points of one color class, no two trees cross, and the total edge length of the trees is minimized. For $k=1$, this is the well-known Euclidean Steiner tree problem. For general $k$, a $kρ$-approximation algorithm is known, where $ρ\le 1.21$ is the Steiner ratio. We present a PTAS for $k=2$, a $(5/3+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for $k=3$, and two approximation algorithms for general~$k$, with ratios $O(\sqrt n \log k)$ and $k+\varepsilon$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

New Algorithms for Maximum Disjoint Paths Based on Tree-Likeness

We study the classical NP-hard problems of finding maximum-size subsets from given sets of $k$ terminal pairs that can be routed via edge-disjoint paths (MaxEDP) or node-disjoint paths (MaxNDP) in a given graph. The approximability of MaxEDP/NDP is currently not well understood; the best known lower bound is $Ω(\log^{1/2-ε}{n})$, assuming NP$~\not\subseteq~$ZPTIME$(n^{\mathrm{poly}\log n})$. This constitutes a significant gap to the best known approximation upper bound of $O(\sqrt{n})$ due to Chekuri et al. (2006) and closing this gap is currently one of the big open problems in approximation algorithms. In their seminal paper, Raghavan and Thompson (Combinatorica, 1987) introduce the technique of randomized rounding for LPs; their technique gives an $O(1)$-approximation when edges (or nodes) may be used by $O(\frac{\log n}{\log\log n})$ paths. In this paper, we strengthen the above fundamental results. We provide new bounds formulated in terms of the feedback vertex set number $r$ of a graph, which measures its vertex deletion distance to a forest. In particular, we obtain the following. * For MaxEDP, we give an $O(\sqrt{r}\cdot \log^{1.5}{kr})$-approximation algorithm. As $r\leq n$, up to logarithmic factors, our result strengthens the best known ratio $O(\sqrt{n})$ due to Chekuri et al. * Further, we show how to route $Ω(\mathrm{OPT})$ pairs with congestion $O(\frac{\log{kr}}{\log\log{kr}})$, strengthening the bound obtained by the classic approach of Raghavan and Thompson. * For MaxNDP, we give an algorithm that gives the optimal answer in time $(k+r)^{O(r)}\cdot n$. If $r$ is at most triple-exponential in $k$, this improves the best known algorithm for MaxNDP with parameter $k$, by Kawarabayashi and Wollan (STOC 2010). We complement these positive results by proving that MaxEDP is NP-hard even for $r=1$, and MaxNDP is W$[1]$-hard for parameter $r$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On Monotone Drawings of Trees

A crossing-free straight-line drawing of a graph is monotone if there is a monotone path between any pair of vertices with respect to some direction. We show how to construct a monotone drawing of a tree with $n$ vertices on an $O(n^{1.5}) \times O(n^{1.5})$ grid whose angles are close to the best possible angular resolution. Our drawings are convex, that is, if every edge to a leaf is substituted by a ray, the (unbounded) faces form convex regions. It is known that convex drawings are monotone and, in the case of trees, also crossing-free. A monotone drawing is strongly monotone if, for every pair of vertices, the direction that witnesses the monotonicity comes from the vector that connects the two vertices. We show that every tree admits a strongly monotone drawing. For biconnected outerplanar graphs, this is easy to see. On the other hand, we present a simply-connected graph that does not have a strongly monotone drawing in any embedding.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Network Design Problems with Bounded Distances via Shallow-Light Steiner Trees

In a directed graph $G$ with non-correlated edge lengths and costs, the \emph{network design problem with bounded distances} asks for a cost-minimal spanning subgraph subject to a length bound for all node pairs. We give a bi-criteria $(2+\varepsilon,O(n^{0.5+\varepsilon}))$-approximation for this problem. This improves on the currently best known linear approximation bound, at the cost of violating the distance bound by a factor of at most~$2+\varepsilon$. In the course of proving this result, the related problem of \emph{directed shallow-light Steiner trees} arises as a subproblem. In the context of directed graphs, approximations to this problem have been elusive. We present the first non-trivial result by proposing a $(1+\varepsilon,O(|R|^{\varepsilon}))$-ap\-proxi\-ma\-tion, where $R$ are the terminals. Finally, we show how to apply our results to obtain an $(α+\varepsilon,O(n^{0.5+\varepsilon}))$-approximation for \emph{light-weight directed $α$-spanners}. For this, no non-trivial approximation algorithm has been known before. All running times depends on $n$ and $\varepsilon$ and are polynomial in $n$ for any fixed $\varepsilon>0$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Approximating Minimum Manhattan Networks in Higher Dimensions

We study the minimum Manhattan network problem, which is defined as follows. Given a set of points called \emph{terminals} in $\R^d$, find a minimum-length network such that each pair of terminals is connected by a set of axis-parallel line segments whose total length is equal to the pair's Manhattan (that is, $L_1$-) distance. The problem is NP-hard in 2D and there is no PTAS for 3D (unless ${\cal P}={\cal NP}$). Approximation algorithms are known for 2D, but not for 3D. We present, for any fixed dimension $d$ and any $\eps>0$, an $O(n^\eps)$-approximation algorithm. For 3D, we also give a $4(k-1)$-approximation algorithm for the case that the terminals are contained in the union of $k \ge 2$ parallel planes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Polylogarithmic Approximation for Generalized Minimum Manhattan Networks

Given a set of $n$ terminals, which are points in $d$-dimensional Euclidean space, the minimum Manhattan network problem (MMN) asks for a minimum-length rectilinear network that connects each pair of terminals by a Manhattan path, that is, a path consisting of axis-parallel segments whose total length equals the pair's Manhattan distance. Even for $d=2$, the problem is NP-hard, but constant-factor approximations are known. For $d \ge 3$, the problem is APX-hard; it is known to admit, for any $\eps > 0$, an $O(n^\eps)$-approximation. In the generalized minimum Manhattan network problem (GMMN), we are given a set $R$ of $n$ terminal pairs, and the goal is to find a minimum-length rectilinear network such that each pair in $R$ is connected by a Manhattan path. GMMN is a generalization of both MMN and the well-known rectilinear Steiner arborescence problem (RSA). So far, only special cases of GMMN have been considered. We present an $O(\log^{d+1} n)$-approximation algorithm for GMMN (and, hence, MMN) in $d \ge 2$ dimensions and an $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithm for 2D. We show that an existing $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithm for RSA in 2D generalizes easily to $d>2$ dimensions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Drawing Graphs with Vertices at Specified Positions and Crossings at Large Angles

Point-set embeddings and large-angle crossings are two areas of graph drawing that independently have received a lot of attention in the past few years. In this paper, we consider problems in the intersection of these two areas. Given the point-set-embedding scenario, we are interested in how much we gain in terms of computational complexity, curve complexity, and generality if we allow large-angle crossings as compared to the planar case. We investigate two drawing styles where only bends or both bends and edges must be drawn on an underlying grid. We present various results for drawings with one, two, and three bends per edge.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

An Optimal Algorithm for the Indirect Covering Subtree Problem

We consider the indirect covering subtree problem (Kim et al., 1996). The input is an edge weighted tree graph along with customers located at the nodes. Each customer is associated with a radius and a penalty. The goal is to locate a tree-shaped facility such that the sum of setup and penalty cost is minimized. The setup cost equals the sum of edge lengths taken by the facility and the penalty cost is the sum of penalties of all customers whose distance to the facility exceeds their radius. The indirect covering subtree problem generalizes the single maximum coverage location problem on trees where the facility is a node rather than a subtree. Indirect covering subtree can be solved in $O(n\log^2 n)$ time (Kim et al., 1996). A slightly faster algorithm for single maximum coverage location with a running time of $O(n\log^2n/\log\log n)$ has been provided (Spoerhase and Wirth, 2009). We achieve time $O(n\log n)$ for indirect covering subtree thereby providing the fastest known algorithm for both problems. Our result implies also faster algorithms for competitive location problems such as $(1,X)$-medianoid and $(1,p)$-centroid on trees. We complement our result by a lower bound of $Ω(n\log n)$ for single maximum coverage location and $(1,X)$-medianoid on a real-number RAM model showing that our algorithm is optimal in running time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Maximum Betweenness Centrality: Approximability and Tractable Cases

The Maximum Betweenness Centrality problem (MBC) can be defined as follows. Given a graph find a $k$-element node set $C$ that maximizes the probability of detecting communication between a pair of nodes $s$ and $t$ chosen uniformly at random. It is assumed that the communication between $s$ and $t$ is realized along a shortest $s$--$t$ path which is, again, selected uniformly at random. The communication is detected if the communication path contains a node of $C$. Recently, Dolev et al. (2009) showed that MBC is NP-hard and gave a $(1-1/e)$-approximation using a greedy approach. We provide a reduction of MBC to Maximum Coverage that simplifies the analysis of the algorithm of Dolev et al. considerably. Our reduction allows us to obtain a new algorithm with the same approximation ratio for a (generalized) budgeted version of MBC. We provide tight examples showing that the analyses of both algorithms are best possible. Moreover, we prove that MBC is APX-complete and provide an exact polynomial-time algorithm for MBC on tree graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access