BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Joachim Spoerhase

Joachim Spoerhase contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational GeometryComputational ComplexityDiscrete Mathematics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Simplification of Polyline Bundles

We propose and study a generalization to the well-known problem of polyline simplification. Instead of a single polyline, we are given a set of $\ell$ polylines possibly sharing some line segments and bend points. Our goal is to minimize the number of bend points in the simplified bundle with respect to some error tolerance $δ$ (measuring Fréchet distance) but under the additional constraint that shared parts have to be simplified consistently. We show that polyline bundle simplification is NP-hard to approximate within a factor $n^{1/3 - \varepsilon}$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$ where $n$ is the number of bend points in the polyline bundle. This inapproximability even applies to instances with only $\ell=2$ polylines. However, we identify the sensitivity of the solution to the choice of $δ$ as a reason for this strong inapproximability. In particular, we prove that if we allow $δ$ to be exceeded by a factor of $2$ in our solution, we can find a simplified polyline bundle with no more than $O(\log (\ell + n)) \cdot OPT$ bend points in polytime, providing us with an efficient bi-criteria approximation. As a further result, we show fixed-parameter tractability in the number of shared bend points.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Approximating Minimum Manhattan Networks in Higher Dimensions

We study the minimum Manhattan network problem, which is defined as follows. Given a set of points called \emph{terminals} in $\R^d$, find a minimum-length network such that each pair of terminals is connected by a set of axis-parallel line segments whose total length is equal to the pair's Manhattan (that is, $L_1$-) distance. The problem is NP-hard in 2D and there is no PTAS for 3D (unless ${\cal P}={\cal NP}$). Approximation algorithms are known for 2D, but not for 3D. We present, for any fixed dimension $d$ and any $\eps>0$, an $O(n^\eps)$-approximation algorithm. For 3D, we also give a $4(k-1)$-approximation algorithm for the case that the terminals are contained in the union of $k \ge 2$ parallel planes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Polylogarithmic Approximation for Generalized Minimum Manhattan Networks

Given a set of $n$ terminals, which are points in $d$-dimensional Euclidean space, the minimum Manhattan network problem (MMN) asks for a minimum-length rectilinear network that connects each pair of terminals by a Manhattan path, that is, a path consisting of axis-parallel segments whose total length equals the pair's Manhattan distance. Even for $d=2$, the problem is NP-hard, but constant-factor approximations are known. For $d \ge 3$, the problem is APX-hard; it is known to admit, for any $\eps > 0$, an $O(n^\eps)$-approximation. In the generalized minimum Manhattan network problem (GMMN), we are given a set $R$ of $n$ terminal pairs, and the goal is to find a minimum-length rectilinear network such that each pair in $R$ is connected by a Manhattan path. GMMN is a generalization of both MMN and the well-known rectilinear Steiner arborescence problem (RSA). So far, only special cases of GMMN have been considered. We present an $O(\log^{d+1} n)$-approximation algorithm for GMMN (and, hence, MMN) in $d \ge 2$ dimensions and an $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithm for 2D. We show that an existing $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithm for RSA in 2D generalizes easily to $d>2$ dimensions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Drawing Graphs with Vertices at Specified Positions and Crossings at Large Angles

Point-set embeddings and large-angle crossings are two areas of graph drawing that independently have received a lot of attention in the past few years. In this paper, we consider problems in the intersection of these two areas. Given the point-set-embedding scenario, we are interested in how much we gain in terms of computational complexity, curve complexity, and generality if we allow large-angle crossings as compared to the planar case. We investigate two drawing styles where only bends or both bends and edges must be drawn on an underlying grid. We present various results for drawings with one, two, and three bends per edge.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

An Optimal Algorithm for the Indirect Covering Subtree Problem

We consider the indirect covering subtree problem (Kim et al., 1996). The input is an edge weighted tree graph along with customers located at the nodes. Each customer is associated with a radius and a penalty. The goal is to locate a tree-shaped facility such that the sum of setup and penalty cost is minimized. The setup cost equals the sum of edge lengths taken by the facility and the penalty cost is the sum of penalties of all customers whose distance to the facility exceeds their radius. The indirect covering subtree problem generalizes the single maximum coverage location problem on trees where the facility is a node rather than a subtree. Indirect covering subtree can be solved in $O(n\log^2 n)$ time (Kim et al., 1996). A slightly faster algorithm for single maximum coverage location with a running time of $O(n\log^2n/\log\log n)$ has been provided (Spoerhase and Wirth, 2009). We achieve time $O(n\log n)$ for indirect covering subtree thereby providing the fastest known algorithm for both problems. Our result implies also faster algorithms for competitive location problems such as $(1,X)$-medianoid and $(1,p)$-centroid on trees. We complement our result by a lower bound of $Ω(n\log n)$ for single maximum coverage location and $(1,X)$-medianoid on a real-number RAM model showing that our algorithm is optimal in running time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Maximum Betweenness Centrality: Approximability and Tractable Cases

The Maximum Betweenness Centrality problem (MBC) can be defined as follows. Given a graph find a $k$-element node set $C$ that maximizes the probability of detecting communication between a pair of nodes $s$ and $t$ chosen uniformly at random. It is assumed that the communication between $s$ and $t$ is realized along a shortest $s$--$t$ path which is, again, selected uniformly at random. The communication is detected if the communication path contains a node of $C$. Recently, Dolev et al. (2009) showed that MBC is NP-hard and gave a $(1-1/e)$-approximation using a greedy approach. We provide a reduction of MBC to Maximum Coverage that simplifies the analysis of the algorithm of Dolev et al. considerably. Our reduction allows us to obtain a new algorithm with the same approximation ratio for a (generalized) budgeted version of MBC. We provide tight examples showing that the analyses of both algorithms are best possible. Moreover, we prove that MBC is APX-complete and provide an exact polynomial-time algorithm for MBC on tree graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access