BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Alexander Wolff

Alexander Wolff contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational GeometryDiscrete Mathematics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Morphing Graph Drawings in the Presence of Point Obstacles

A crossing-free morph is a continuous deformation between two graph drawings that preserves straight-line pairwise noncrossing edges. Motivated by applications in 3D morphing problems, we initiate the study of morphing graph drawings in the plane in the presence of stationary point obstacles, which need to be avoided throughout the deformation. As our main result, we prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether such an obstacle-avoiding 2D morph between two given drawings of the same graph exists. In fact, this statement remains true even in the severely restricted special case where only three vertices have to change positions. This is in sharp contrast to the classical case without obstacles, where there is an efficiently verifiable (necessary and sufficient) criterion for the existence of a morph. Further, we provide several combinatorial results related to conditions under which the existence of a morph between two drawings of a graph can or cannot be prevented by the placement of a given number of point obstacles.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2024arXiv

Computing Height-Optimal Tangles Faster

We study the following combinatorial problem. Given a set of $n$ y-monotone wires, a tangle determines the order of the wires on a number of horizontal layers such that the orders of the wires on any two consecutive layers differ only in swaps of neighboring wires. Given a multiset $L$ of swaps (that is, unordered pairs of numbers between 1 and $n$) and an initial order of the wires, a tangle realizes $L$ if each pair of wires changes its order exactly as many times as specified by $L$. The aim is to find a tangle that realizes $L$ using the smallest number of layers. We show that this problem is NP-hard, and we give an algorithm that computes an optimal tangle for $n$ wires and a given list $L$ of swaps in $O((2|L|/n^2+1)^{n^2/2} \cdot φ^n \cdot n)$ time, where $φ\approx 1.618$ is the golden ratio. We can treat lists where every swap occurs at most once in $O(n!φ^n)$ time. We implemented the algorithm for the general case and compared it to an existing algorithm. Finally, we discuss feasibility for lists with a simple structure.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

The Complexity of Finding Tangles

We study the following combinatorial problem. Given a set of $n$ y-monotone curves, which we call wires, a tangle determines the order of the wires on a number of horizontal layers such that any two consecutive layers differ only in swaps of neighboring wires. Given a multiset $L$ of swaps (that is, unordered pairs of wires) and an initial order of the wires, a tangle realizes $L$ if each pair of wires changes its order exactly as many times as specified by $L$. Deciding whether a given multiset of swaps admits a realizing tangle is known to be NP-hard [Yamanaka et al., CCCG 2018]. We prove that this problem remains NP-hard if every pair of wires swaps only a constant number of times. On the positive side, we improve the runtime of a previous exponential-time algorithm. We also show that the problem is in NP and fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the number of wires.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Morphing Rectangular Duals

A rectangular dual of a plane graph $G$ is a contact representations of $G$ by interior-disjoint axis-aligned rectangles such that (i) no four rectangles share a point and (ii) the union of all rectangles is a rectangle. A rectangular dual gives rise to a regular edge labeling (REL), which captures the orientations of the rectangle contacts. We study the problem of morphing between two rectangular duals of the same plane graph. If we require that, at any time throughout the morph, there is a rectangular dual, then a morph exists only if the two rectangular duals realize the same REL. Therefore, we allow intermediate contact representations of non-rectangular polygons of constant complexity. Given an $n$-vertex plane graph, we show how to compute in $O(n^3)$ time a piecewise linear morph that consists of $O(n^2)$ linear morphing steps.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Segment Number: Algorithms and Universal Lower Bounds for Some Classes of Planar Graphs

The segment number of a planar graph $G$ is the smallest number of line segments needed for a planar straight-line drawing of $G$. Dujmović, Eppstein, Suderman, and Wood [CGTA'07] introduced this measure for the visual complexity of graphs. There are optimal algorithms for trees and worst-case optimal algorithms for outerplanar graphs, 2-trees, and planar 3-trees. It is known that every cubic triconnected planar $n$-vertex graph (except $K_4$) has segment number $n/2+3$, which is the only known universal lower bound for a meaningful class of planar graphs. We show that every triconnected planar 4-regular graph can be drawn using at most $n+3$ segments. This bound is tight up to an additive constant, improves a previous upper bound of $7n/4+2$ implied by a more general result of Dujmović et al., and supplements the result for cubic graphs. We also give a simple optimal algorithm for cactus graphs, generalizing the above-mentioned result for trees. We prove the first linear universal lower bounds for outerpaths, maximal outerplanar graphs, 2-trees, and planar 3-trees. This shows that the existing algorithms for these graph classes are constant-factor approximations. For maximal outerpaths, our bound is best possible and can be generalized to circular arcs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Drawing Graphs with Circular Arcs and Right-Angle Crossings

In a RAC drawing of a graph, vertices are represented by points in the plane, adjacent vertices are connected by line segments, and crossings must form right angles. Graphs that admit such drawings are RAC graphs. RAC graphs are beyond-planar graphs and have been studied extensively. In particular, it is known that a RAC graph with n vertices has at most 4n - 10 edges. We introduce a superclass of RAC graphs, which we call arc-RAC graphs. A graph is arc-RAC if it admits a drawing where edges are represented by circular arcs and crossings form right angles. We provide a Turán-type result showing that an arc-RAC graph with n vertices has at most 14n - 12 edges and that there are n-vertex arc-RAC graphs with 4.5n - o(n) edges.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Recognizing Stick Graphs with and without Length Constraints

Stick graphs are intersection graphs of horizontal and vertical line segments that all touch a line of slope -1 and lie above this line. De Luca et al. [GD'18] considered the recognition problem of stick graphs when no order is given (STICK), when the order of either one of the two sets is given (STICK_A), and when the order of both sets is given (STICK_AB). They showed how to solve STICK_AB efficiently. In this paper, we improve the running time of their algorithm, and we solve STICK_A efficiently. Further, we consider variants of these problems where the lengths of the sticks are given as input. We show that these variants of STICK, STICK_A, and STICK_AB are all NP-complete. On the positive side, we give an efficient solution for STICK_AB with fixed stick lengths if there are no isolated vertices.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Representing Graphs and Hypergraphs by Touching Polygons in 3D

Contact representations of graphs have a long history. Most research has focused on problems in 2D, but 3D contact representations have also been investigated, mostly concerning fully-dimensional geometric objects such as spheres or cubes. In this paper we study contact representations with convex polygons in 3D. We show that every graph admits such a representation. Since our representations use super-polynomial coordinates, we also construct representations on grids of polynomial size for specific graph classes (bipartite, subcubic). For hypergraphs, we represent their duals, that is, each vertex is represented by a point and each edge by a polygon. We show that even regular and quite small hypergraphs do not admit such representations. On the other hand, the two smallest Steiner triple systems can be represented.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access