Paper detail

Maximum Betweenness Centrality: Approximability and Tractable Cases

The Maximum Betweenness Centrality problem (MBC) can be defined as follows. Given a graph find a $k$-element node set $C$ that maximizes the probability of detecting communication between a pair of nodes $s$ and $t$ chosen uniformly at random. It is assumed that the communication between $s$ and $t$ is realized along a shortest $s$--$t$ path which is, again, selected uniformly at random. The communication is detected if the communication path contains a node of $C$. Recently, Dolev et al. (2009) showed that MBC is NP-hard and gave a $(1-1/e)$-approximation using a greedy approach. We provide a reduction of MBC to Maximum Coverage that simplifies the analysis of the algorithm of Dolev et al. considerably. Our reduction allows us to obtain a new algorithm with the same approximation ratio for a (generalized) budgeted version of MBC. We provide tight examples showing that the analyses of both algorithms are best possible. Moreover, we prove that MBC is APX-complete and provide an exact polynomial-time algorithm for MBC on tree graphs.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.