BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

J. Bass

J. Bass contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Superconductivity above 200 K Observed in Superhydrides of Calcium

Searching for superconductivity with Tc near room temperature is of great interest both for fundamental science & many potential applications. Here we report the experimental discovery of superconductivity with maximum critical temperature (Tc) above 210 K in calcium superhydrides, the new alkali earth hydrides experimentally showing superconductivity above 200 K in addition to sulfur hydride & rare-earth hydride system. The materials are synthesized at the synergetic conditions of 160~190 GPa and ~2000 K using diamond anvil cell combined with in-situ laser heating technique. The superconductivity was studied through in-situ high pressure electric conductance measurements in an applied magnetic field for the sample quenched from high temperature while maintained at high pressures. The upper critical field Hc(0) was estimated to be ~268 T while the GL coherent length is ~11 angstrom. The in-situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction measurements suggest that the synthesized calcium hydrides are primarily composed of CaH6 while there may also exist other calcium hydrides with different hydrogen contents.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A Study of Spin-Flipping in Sputtered IrMn using Py-based Exchange-Biased Spin-Valves

To study spin flipping within the antiferromagnet IrMn, we extended prior Current-Perpendicular-to-Plane (CPP) Giant Magnetoresistance (GMR) studies of Py-based exchange-biased-spin-valves containing IrMn inserts to thicker IrMn layers-5 nm less than or equal to t(IrMn) less than or equal to 30 nm. Unexpectedly, AΔR = A[R(AP) - R(P)]--the difference in specific resistance between the anti-parallel (AP) and parallel (P) magnetic states of the two Py layers-did not decrease with increasing t(IrMn), for t(IrMn) greater than 5 nm, but rather became constant to within our measuring uncertainty. This constant looks to be due mostly to a new, small MR in thin Py layers. The constant complicates isolating the spin-diffusion length, lsf(IrMn), in bulk IrMn, but lsf(IrMn) is probably short, less than or equal to 1 nm. Similar results were found with FeMn.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Conduction Electron Scattering and Spin-Flipping at Sputtered Co/Ni Interfaces

Current-perpendicular-to-plane magnetoresistance (CPP-MR) measurements let us quantify conduction electron scattering and spin-flipping at a sputtered ferromagnetic/ferromagnetic (F1/F2 = Co/Ni) interface, with important consequences for CPP-MR and spin-torque experiments with perpendicular anisotropy. We use ferromagnetically coupled ([Ni/Co]xn)Ni multilayers, and Py-based, symmetric double exchange-biased spin-valves (DEBSVs) containing inserts of ferromagnetically coupled ([Co/Ni]xn)Co or ([Ni/Co]xn)Ni multilayers, to derive Co/Ni interface specific resistances AR(Co/Ni)(Up) = 0.03 (+0.02)(-0.03) f-ohm-m^2 and AR(Co/Ni)(down) = 1.00 +/- 0.07 f-ohm-m^2, and interface spin-flipping parameter delta(Co/Ni) = 0.35 +/- 0.05. The specific resistances are consistent with our no-free-parameter calculations for an interface thickness between 2 and 4 monolayers (ML) that is compatible with expectations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Conduction Electron Spin-Flipping at Sputtered Co(90)Fe(10)/Cu Interfaces

From measurements of the current-perpendicular-to-plane (CPP) magnetoresistance of ferromagnetically coupled [Co(90)Fe(10)/Cu]xn multilayers, within sputtered Permalloy-based double exchange biased spin-valves, we determine the parameter delta[(Co(90)Fe(10))/Cu] = 0.19 +/- 0.04 that sets the probability P of spin-flipping at a Co(90)Fe(10)/Cu interface via the equation P = 1 - exp(-delta).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

A way to measure electron spin-flipping at F/N interfaces and application to Co/Cu

We describe a technique, using the current-perpendicular-to-plane (CPP) geometry, to measure the parameter delta(F/N), characterizing flipping of electron spins at a ferromagnetic/non-magnetic (F/N) metallic interface. The technique involves measuring the CPP magnetoresistance of a sample containing a ferromagnetically coupled [F/N]x n multilayer embedded within the 20 nm thick central Cu layer of a symmetric Py-based, double exchange-biased spin-valve. To focus on delta(F/N), the F- and N-layers are made thin compared to their spin-diffusion lengths. We test the technique using F/N = Co/Cu. Analysing with no adjustable parameters, gives inconsistency with delta(Co/Cu) = 0, but consistency with our prior value of delta(Co/Cu) = 0.25 (+/- 0.1). Taking delta(Co/Cu) as adjustable gives delta(Co/Cu) = 0.33 (+0.03/-0.08).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Perpendicular-current Studies of Electron Transport Across Metal/Metal Interfaces

We review what we have learned about the scattering of electrons by the interfaces between two different metals (M1/M2) in the current-perpendicular-to-plane (CPP) geometry. In this geometry, the intrinsic quantity is the specific resistance, AR, the product of the area through which the CPP current flows times the CPP resistance. We describe results for both non-magnetic/non-magnetic (N1/N2) and ferromagnetic/non-magnetic (F/N) pairs. We focus especially upon cases where M1/M2 are lattice matched (i.e., have the same crystal structure and the same lattice parameters to within ~ 1%), because in these cases no-free-parameter calculations of 2AR agree surprisingly well with measured values. But we also list and briefly discuss cases where M1/M2 are not lattice matched, either having different crystal structures, or lattice parameters that differ by several percent. The published calculations of 2AR in these latter cases do not agree so well with measured values.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Sensitivity of Ag/Al Interface Specific Resistances to Interfacial Intermixing

We have measured an Ag/Al interface specific resistance, 2AR(Ag/Al)(111) = 1.4 fOhm-m^2, that is twice that predicted for a perfect interface, 50% larger than for a 2 ML 50%-50% alloy, and even larger than our newly predicted 1.3 fOhmm^2 for a 4 ML 50%-50% alloy. Such a large value of 2ARAg/Al(111) confirms a predicted sensitivity to interfacial disorder and suggests an interface greater than or equal to 4 ML thick. From our calculations, a predicted anisotropy ratio, 2AR(Ag/Al)(001)/2AR(Ag/Al)(111), of more then 4 for a perfect interface, should be reduced to less than 2 for a 4 ML interface, making it harder to detect any such anisotropy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2003arXiv

Controlled normal and inverse magnetoresistance and current-driven magnetization switching in magnetic nanopillars

Combining pairs of ferromagnetic metals with different signs of scattering anisotropies, let us independently invert the magnetoresistance and the direction of current-driven switching in ferromagnetic/non-magnetic/ferromagnetic metal nanopillars. We show all four combinations of normal and inverse behaviors, at both room temperature and 4.2K. In all cases studied, the direction of switching is set by the net scattering anisotropy of the fixed (polarizing) ferromagnet. We provide simple arguments for what we see.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access