Researcher profile

H. Y. T. Nguyen

H. Y. T. Nguyen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2010arXiv

A Study of Spin-Flipping in Sputtered IrMn using Py-based Exchange-Biased Spin-Valves

To study spin flipping within the antiferromagnet IrMn, we extended prior Current-Perpendicular-to-Plane (CPP) Giant Magnetoresistance (GMR) studies of Py-based exchange-biased-spin-valves containing IrMn inserts to thicker IrMn layers-5 nm less than or equal to t(IrMn) less than or equal to 30 nm. Unexpectedly, AΔR = A[R(AP) - R(P)]--the difference in specific resistance between the anti-parallel (AP) and parallel (P) magnetic states of the two Py layers-did not decrease with increasing t(IrMn), for t(IrMn) greater than 5 nm, but rather became constant to within our measuring uncertainty. This constant looks to be due mostly to a new, small MR in thin Py layers. The constant complicates isolating the spin-diffusion length, lsf(IrMn), in bulk IrMn, but lsf(IrMn) is probably short, less than or equal to 1 nm. Similar results were found with FeMn.

preprint2010arXiv

Conduction Electron Scattering and Spin-Flipping at Sputtered Co/Ni Interfaces

Current-perpendicular-to-plane magnetoresistance (CPP-MR) measurements let us quantify conduction electron scattering and spin-flipping at a sputtered ferromagnetic/ferromagnetic (F1/F2 = Co/Ni) interface, with important consequences for CPP-MR and spin-torque experiments with perpendicular anisotropy. We use ferromagnetically coupled ([Ni/Co]xn)Ni multilayers, and Py-based, symmetric double exchange-biased spin-valves (DEBSVs) containing inserts of ferromagnetically coupled ([Co/Ni]xn)Co or ([Ni/Co]xn)Ni multilayers, to derive Co/Ni interface specific resistances AR(Co/Ni)(Up) = 0.03 (+0.02)(-0.03) f-ohm-m^2 and AR(Co/Ni)(down) = 1.00 +/- 0.07 f-ohm-m^2, and interface spin-flipping parameter delta(Co/Ni) = 0.35 +/- 0.05. The specific resistances are consistent with our no-free-parameter calculations for an interface thickness between 2 and 4 monolayers (ML) that is compatible with expectations.

preprint2010arXiv

Conduction Electron Spin-Flipping at Sputtered Co(90)Fe(10)/Cu Interfaces

From measurements of the current-perpendicular-to-plane (CPP) magnetoresistance of ferromagnetically coupled [Co(90)Fe(10)/Cu]xn multilayers, within sputtered Permalloy-based double exchange biased spin-valves, we determine the parameter delta[(Co(90)Fe(10))/Cu] = 0.19 +/- 0.04 that sets the probability P of spin-flipping at a Co(90)Fe(10)/Cu interface via the equation P = 1 - exp(-delta).

preprint2009arXiv

A way to measure electron spin-flipping at F/N interfaces and application to Co/Cu

We describe a technique, using the current-perpendicular-to-plane (CPP) geometry, to measure the parameter delta(F/N), characterizing flipping of electron spins at a ferromagnetic/non-magnetic (F/N) metallic interface. The technique involves measuring the CPP magnetoresistance of a sample containing a ferromagnetically coupled [F/N]x n multilayer embedded within the 20 nm thick central Cu layer of a symmetric Py-based, double exchange-biased spin-valve. To focus on delta(F/N), the F- and N-layers are made thin compared to their spin-diffusion lengths. We test the technique using F/N = Co/Cu. Analysing with no adjustable parameters, gives inconsistency with delta(Co/Cu) = 0, but consistency with our prior value of delta(Co/Cu) = 0.25 (+/- 0.1). Taking delta(Co/Cu) as adjustable gives delta(Co/Cu) = 0.33 (+0.03/-0.08).