Source author record

Ismael G. Yero

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

38works
5topics
4close collaborators

Published work

38 publications

preprint2024arXiv

Mutual-visibility problems on graphs of diameter two

The mutual-visibility problem in a graph GG asks for the cardinality of a largest set of vertices S⊆V(G)S\subseteq V(G) so that for any two vertices x,y∈Sx,y\in S there is a shortest x,yx,y-path PP so that all internal vertices of PP are not in SS. This is also said as x,yx,y are visible with respect to SS, or SS-visible for short. Variations of this problem are known, based on the extension of the visibility property of vertices that are in and/or outside SS. Such variations are called total, outer and dual mutual-visibility problems. This work is focused on studying the corresponding four visibility parameters in graphs of diameter two, throughout showing bounds and/or closed formulae for these parameters. The mutual-visibility problem in the Cartesian product of two complete graphs is equivalent to (an instance of) the celebrated Zarankievicz's problem. Here we study the dual and outer mutual-visibility problem for the Cartesian product of two complete graphs and all the mutual-visibility problems for the direct product of such graphs as well. We also study all the mutual-visibility problems for the line graphs of complete and complete bipartite graphs. As a consequence of this study, we present several relationships between the mentioned problems and some instances of the classical Turán problem. Moreover, we study the visibility problems for cographs and several non-trivial diameter-two graphs of minimum size.

preprint2022arXiv

Further contributions on the outer multiset dimension of graphs

The outer multiset dimension dimms(G){\rm dim}_{\rm ms}(G) of a graph GG is the cardinality of a smallest set of vertices that uniquely recognize all the vertices outside this set by using multisets of distances to the set. It is proved that dimms(G)=n(G)−1{\rm dim}_{\rm ms}(G) = n(G) - 1 if and only if GG is a regular graph with diameter at most 22. Graphs GG with dimms(G)=2{\rm dim}_{\rm ms}(G)=2 are described and recognized in polynomial time. A lower bound on the lexicographic product of GG and HH is proved when HH is complete or edgeless, and the extremal graphs are determined. It is proved that dimms(Ps □ Pt)=3{\rm dim}_{\rm ms}(P_s\,\square\, P_t) = 3 for s≥t≥2s\ge t\ge 2.

preprint2021arXiv

A note on the metric and edge metric dimensions of 2-connected graphs

For a given graph GG, the metric and edge metric dimensions of GG, dim⁡(G)\dim(G) and edim(G){\rm edim}(G), are the cardinalities of the smallest possible subsets of vertices in V(G)V(G) such that they uniquely identify the vertices and the edges of GG, respectively, by means of distances. It is already known that metric and edge metric dimensions are not in general comparable. Infinite families of graphs with pendant vertices in which the edge metric dimension is smaller than the metric dimension are already known. In this article, we construct a 2-connected graph GG such that dim⁡(G)=a\dim(G)=a and edim(G)=b{\rm edim}(G)=b for every pair of integers a,ba,b, where 4≤b<a4\le b<a. For this we use subdivisions of complete graphs, whose metric dimension is in some cases smaller than the edge metric dimension. Along the way, we present an upper bound for the metric and edge metric dimensions of subdivision graphs under some special conditions.

preprint2021arXiv

On Metric Dimensions of Hypercubes

The metric (resp. edge metric or mixed metric) dimension of a graph GG, is the cardinality of the smallest ordered set of vertices that uniquely recognizes all the pairs of distinct vertices (resp. edges, or vertices and edges) of GG by using a vector of distances to this set. In this note we show two unexpected results on hypercube graphs. First, we show that the metric and edge metric dimension of QdQ_d differ by only one for every integer dd. In particular, if dd is odd, then the metric and edge metric dimensions of QdQ_d are equal. Second, we prove that the metric and mixed metric dimensions of the hypercube QdQ_d are equal for every d≥3d \ge 3. We conclude the paper by conjecturing that all these three types of metric dimensions of QdQ_d are equal when dd is large enough.

preprint2021arXiv

Total Roman 2-domination in graphs

Given a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), a function f:V→{0,1,2}f:V\rightarrow \{0,1,2\} is a total Roman {2}\{2\}-dominating function if: (1) every vertex v∈Vv\in V for which f(v)=0f(v)=0 satisfies that ∑u∈N(v)f(u)≥2\sum_{u\in N(v)}f(u)\geq 2, where N(v)N(v) represents the open neighborhood of vv, and (2) every vertex x∈Vx\in V for which f(x)≥1f(x)\geq 1 is adjacent to at least one vertex y∈Vy\in V such that f(y)≥1f(y)\geq 1. The weight of the function ff is defined as ω(f)=∑v∈Vf(v)ω(f)=\sum_{v\in V}f(v). The total Roman {2}\{2\}-domination number, denoted by γt{R2}(G)γ_{t\{R2\}}(G), is the minimum weight among all total Roman {2}\{2\}-dominating functions on GG. In this article we introduce the concepts above and begin the study of its combinatorial and computational properties. For instance, we give several closed relationships between this parameter and other domination related parameters in graphs. In addition, we prove that the complexity of computing the value γt{R2}(G)γ_{t\{R2\}}(G) is NP-hard, even when restricted to bipartite or chordal graphs.

preprint2020arXiv

A note on total co-independent domination in trees

A set DD of vertices of a graph GG is a total dominating set if every vertex of GG is adjacent to at least one vertex of DD. The total domination number of GG is the minimum cardinality of any total dominating set of GG and is denoted by γt(G)γ_t(G). The total dominating set DD is called a total co-independent dominating set if V(G)∖DV(G)\setminus D is an independent set and has at least one vertex. The minimum cardinality of any total co-independent dominating set is denoted by γt,coi(G)γ_{t,coi}(G). In this paper, we show that, for any tree TT of order nn and diameter at least three, n−β(T)≤γt,coi(T)≤n−∣L(T)∣n-β(T)\leq γ_{t,coi}(T)\leq n-|L(T)| where β(T)β(T) is the maximum cardinality of any independent set and L(T)L(T) is the set of leaves of TT. We also characterize the families of trees attaining the extremal bounds above and show that the differences between the value of γt,coi(T)γ_{t,coi}(T) and these bounds can be arbitrarily large for some classes of trees.

preprint2020arXiv

Dominating the direct product of two graphs through total Roman strategies

Given a graph GG without isolated vertices, a total Roman dominating function for GG is a function f:V(G)→{0,1,2}f : V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\} such that every vertex with label 0 is adjacent to a vertex with label 2, and the set of vertices with positive labels induces a graph of minimum degree at least one. The total Roman domination number γtR(G)γ_{tR}(G) of GG is the smallest possible value of ∑v∈V(G)f(v)\sum_{v\in V(G)}f(v) among all total Roman dominating functions ff. The total Roman domination number of the direct product G×HG\times H of the graphs GG and HH is studied in this work. Specifically, several relationships, in the shape of upper and lower bounds, between γtR(G×H)γ_{tR}(G\times H) and some classical domination parameters for the factors are given. Characterizations of the direct product graphs G×HG\times H achieving small values (≤7\le 7) for γtR(G×H)γ_{tR}(G\times H) are presented, and exact values for γtR(G×H)γ_{tR}(G\times H) are deduced, while considering various specific direct product classes.

preprint2020arXiv

General dd-position sets

The general dd-position number gpd(G){\rm gp}_d(G) of a graph GG is the cardinality of a largest set SS for which no three distinct vertices from SS lie on a common geodesic of length at most dd. This new graph parameter generalizes the well studied general position number. We first give some results concerning the monotonic behavior of gpd(G){\rm gp}_d(G) with respect to the suitable values of dd. We show that the decision problem concerning finding gpd(G){\rm gp}_d(G) is NP-complete for any value of dd. The value of gpd(G){\rm gp}_d(G) when GG is a path or a cycle is computed and a structural characterization of general dd-position sets is shown. Moreover, we present some relationships with other topics including strong resolving graphs and dissociation sets. We finish our exposition by proving that gpd(G){\rm gp}_d(G) is infinite whenever GG is an infinite graph and dd is a finite integer.

preprint2020arXiv

Graphs with the edge metric dimension smaller than the metric dimension

Given a connected graph GG, the metric (resp. edge metric) dimension of GG is the cardinality of the smallest ordered set of vertices that uniquely identifies every pair of distinct vertices (resp. edges) of GG by means of distance vectors to such a set. In this work, we settle three open problems on (edge) metric dimension of graphs. Specifically, we show that for every r,t≥2r,t\ge 2 with r≠tr\ne t, there is n0n_0, such that for every n≥n0n\ge n_0 there exists a graph GG of order nn with metric dimension rr and edge metric dimension tt, which among other consequences, shows the existence of infinitely many graph whose edge metric dimension is strictly smaller than its metric dimension. In addition, we also prove that it is not possible to bound the edge metric dimension of a graph GG by some constant factor of the metric dimension of GG.

preprint2020arXiv

Maker-Breaker resolving game

A set of vertices WW of a graph GG is a resolving set if every vertex of GG is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to WW. In this paper, the Maker-Breaker resolving game is introduced. The game is played on a graph GG by Resolver and Spoiler who alternately select a vertex of GG not yet chosen. Resolver wins if at some point the vertices chosen by him form a resolving set of GG, whereas Spoiler wins if the Resolver cannot form a resolving set of GG. The outcome of the game is denoted by o(G)o(G) and RMB(G)R_{\rm MB}(G) (resp. SMB(G)S_{\rm MB}(G)) denotes the minimum number of moves of Resolver (resp. Spoiler) to win when Resolver has the first move. The corresponding invariants for the game when Spoiler has the first move are denoted by RMB′(G)R'_{\rm MB}(G) and SMB′(G)S'_{\rm MB}(G). Invariants RMB(G)R_{\rm MB}(G), RMB′(G)R'_{\rm MB}(G), SMB(G)S_{\rm MB}(G), and SMB′(G)S'_{\rm MB}(G) are compared among themselves and with the metric dimension dim(G){\rm dim}(G). A large class of graphs GG is constructed for which RMB(G)>dim(G)R_{\rm MB}(G) > {\rm dim}(G) holds. The effect of twin equivalence classes and pairing resolving sets on the Maker-Breaker resolving game is described. As an application o(G)o(G), as well as RMB(G)R_{\rm MB}(G) and RMB′(G)R'_{\rm MB}(G) (or SMB(G)S_{\rm MB}(G) and SMB′(G)S'_{\rm MB}(G)), are determined for several graph classes, including trees, complete multi-partite graphs, grid graphs, and torus grid graphs.

preprint2018arXiv

The fractional kk-metric dimension of graphs

Let GG be a graph with vertex set V(G)V(G). For any two distinct vertices xx and yy of GG, let R{x,y}R\{x, y\} denote the set of vertices zz such that the distance from xx to zz is not equal to the distance from yy to zz in GG. For a function gg defined on V(G)V(G) and for U⊆V(G)U \subseteq V(G), let g(U)=∑s∈Ug(s)g(U)=\sum_{s \in U}g(s). Let $κ(G)=\min\{|R\{x,y\}|: x\neq y \mbox{ and } x,y \in V(G)\}$. For any real number k∈[1,κ(G)]k \in [1, κ(G)], a real-valued function g:V(G)→[0,1]g: V(G) \rightarrow [0,1] is a \emph{kk-resolving function} of GG if g(R{x,y})≥kg(R\{x,y\}) \ge k for any two distinct vertices x,y∈V(G)x,y \in V(G). The \emph{fractional kk-metric dimension}, dim⁡fk(G)\dim^k_f(G), of GG is $\min\{g(V(G)): g \mbox{ is a $k$-resolving function of } G\}$. In this paper, we initiate the study of the fractional kk-metric dimension of graphs. For a connected graph GG and k∈[1,κ(G)]k \in [1, κ(G)], it's easy to see that k≤dim⁡fk(G)≤k∣V(G)∣κ(G)k \le \dim_f^k(G) \le \frac{k|V(G)|}{κ(G)}; we characterize graphs GG satisfying dim⁡fk(G)=k\dim_f^k(G)=k and dim⁡fk(G)=∣V(G)∣\dim_f^k(G)=|V(G)|, respectively. We show that dim⁡fk(G)≥kdim⁡f(G)\dim_f^k(G) \ge k \dim_f(G) for any k∈[1,κ(G)]k \in [1, κ(G)], and we give an example showing that dim⁡fk(G)−kdim⁡f(G)\dim_f^k(G)-k\dim_f(G) can be arbitrarily large for some k∈(1,κ(G)]k \in (1, κ(G)]; we also describe a condition for which dim⁡fk(G)=kdim⁡f(G)\dim_f^k(G)=k\dim_f(G) holds. We determine the fractional kk-metric dimension for some classes of graphs, and conclude with two open problems, including whether ϕ(k)=dim⁡fk(G)ϕ(k)=\dim_f^k(G) is a continuous function of kk on every connected graph GG.

preprint2016arXiv

Mixed metric dimension of graphs

Let G=(V,E)G=(V,E) be a connected graph. A vertex w∈Vw\in V distinguishes two elements (vertices or edges) x,y∈E∪Vx,y\in E\cup V if dG(w,x)≠dG(w,y)d_G(w,x)\ne d_G(w,y). A set SS of vertices in a connected graph GG is a mixed metric generator for GG if every two elements (vertices or edges) of GG are distinguished by some vertex of SS. The smallest cardinality of a mixed metric generator for GG is called the mixed metric dimension and is denoted by mdim(G)\mathrm{mdim}(G). In this paper we consider the structure of mixed metric generators and characterize graphs for which the mixed metric dimension equals the trivial lower and upper bounds. We also give results about the mixed metric dimension of some families of graphs and present an upper bound with respect to the girth of a graph. Finally, we prove that the problem of determining the mixed metric dimension of a graph is NP-hard in the general case.

preprint2016arXiv

On the Computational Complexities of Three Privacy Measures for Large Networks Under Active Attack

With the arrival of modern internet era, large public networks of various types have come to existence to benefit the society as a whole and several research areas such as sociology, economics and geography in particular. However, the societal and research benefits of these networks have also given rise to potentially significant privacy issues in the sense that malicious entities may violate the privacy of the users of such a network by analyzing the network and deliberately using such privacy violations for deleterious purposes. Such considerations have given rise to a new active research area that deals with the quantification of privacy of users in large networks and the corresponding investigation of computational complexity issues of computing such quantified privacy measures. In this paper, we formalize three such privacy measures for large networks and provide non-trivial theoretical computational complexity results for computing these measures. Our results show the first two measures can be computed efficiently, whereas the third measure is provably hard to compute within a logarithmic approximation factor. Furthermore, we also provide computational complexity results for the case when the privacy requirement of the network is severely restricted, including an efficient logarithmic approximation.

preprint2016arXiv

The fractional strong metric dimension in three graph products

For any two distinct vertices xx and yy of a graph GG, let S{x,y}S\{x, y\} denote the set of vertices zz such that either xx lies on a y−zy-z geodesic or yy lies on an x−zx-z geodesic. Let g:V(G)→[0,1]g: V(G) \rightarrow [0,1] be a real valued function and, for any U⊆V(G)U \subseteq V(G), let g(U)=∑v∈Ug(v)g(U)=\sum_{v \in U}g(v). The function gg is a strong resolving function of GG if g(S{x,y})≥1g(S\{x, y\}) \ge 1 for every pair of distinct vertices x,yx, y of GG. The fractional strong metric dimension, sdimf(G)sdim_f(G), of a graph GG is $\min\{g(V(G)): g \mbox{ is a strong resolving function of }G\}$. In this paper, after obtaining some new results for all connected graphs, we focus on the study of the fractional strong metric dimension of the corona product, the lexicographic product, and the Cartesian product of graphs.

preprint2016arXiv

Uniquely identifying the edges of a graph: the edge metric dimension

Let G=(V,E)G=(V,E) be a connected graph, let v∈Vv\in V be a vertex and let e=uw∈Ee=uw\in E be an edge. The distance between the vertex vv and the edge ee is given by dG(e,v)=min⁡{dG(u,v),dG(w,v)}d_G(e,v)=\min\{d_G(u,v),d_G(w,v)\}. A vertex w∈Vw\in V distinguishes two edges e1,e2∈Ee_1,e_2\in E if dG(w,e1)≠dG(w,e2)d_G(w,e_1)\ne d_G(w,e_2). A set SS of vertices in a connected graph GG is an edge metric generator for GG if every two edges of GG are distinguished by some vertex of SS. The smallest cardinality of an edge metric generator for GG is called the edge metric dimension and is denoted by edim(G)edim(G). In this article we introduce the concept of edge metric dimension and initiate the study of its mathematical properties. We make a comparison between the edge metric dimension and the standard metric dimension of graphs while presenting some realization results concerning the edge metric dimension and the standard metric dimension of graphs. We prove that computing the edge metric dimension of connected graphs is NP-hard and give some approximation results. Moreover, we present some bounds and closed formulae for the edge metric dimension of several classes of graphs.

preprint2015arXiv

Graphs that are simultaneously efficient open domination and efficient closed domination graphs

A graph is an efficient open (resp.\ closed) domination graph if there exists a subset of vertices whose open (resp.\ closed) neighborhoods partition its vertex set. Graphs that are efficient open as well as efficient closed (shortly EOCD graphs) are investigated. The structure of EOCD graphs with respect to their efficient open and efficient closed dominating sets is explained. It is shown that the decision problem regarding whether a graph is an EOCD graph is an NP-complete problem. A recursive description that constructs all EOCD trees is given and EOCD graphs are characterized among the Sierpiński graphs.

preprint2015arXiv

k-Metric Antidimension: a Privacy Measure for Social Graphs

Let G=(V,E)G = (V, E) be a simple connected graph and S={w1,⋯ ,wt}⊆VS = \{w_1, \cdots, w_t\} \subseteq V an ordered subset of vertices. The metric representation of a vertex u∈Vu\in V with respect to SS is the tt-vector r(u∣S)=(dG(u,w1),⋯ ,dG(u,wt))r(u|S) = (d_G(u, w_1), \cdots, d_G(u, w_t)), where dG(u,v)d_G(u, v) represents the length of a shortest u−vu-v path in GG. The set SS is called a resolving set for GG if r(u∣S)=r(v∣S)r(u|S) = r(v|S) implies u=vu = v for every u,v∈Vu, v \in V. The smallest cardinality of a resolving set is the metric dimension of GG. In this article we propose, to the best of our knowledge, a new problem in Graph Theory that resembles to the aforementioned metric dimension problem. We call SS a kk-antiresolving set if kk is the largest positive integer such that for every vertex v∈V−Sv \in V-S there exist other k−1k-1 different vertices v1,⋯ ,vk−1∈V−Sv_1, \cdots, v_{k-1} \in V-S with r(v∣S)=r(v1∣S)=⋯=r(vk−1∣S)r(v|S) = r(v_1|S) = \cdots = r(v_{k-1}|S), \emph{i.e.}, vv and v1,⋯ ,vk−1v_1, \cdots, v_{k-1} have the same metric representation with respect to SS. The kk-metric antidimension of GG is the minimum cardinality among all the kk-antiresolving sets for GG. In this article, we introduce a novel privacy measure, named (k,ℓ)(k, \ell)-anonymity and based on the kk-metric antidimension problem, aimed at evaluating the resistance of social graphs to active attacks. We, therefore, propose a true-biased algorithm for computing the kk-metric antidimension of random graphs. The success rate of our algorithm, according to empirical results, is above 80%80 \% and 90%90 \% when looking for a kk-antiresolving basis and a kk-antiresolving set respectively. We also investigate theoretical properties of the kk-antiresolving sets and the kk-metric antidimension of graphs. In particular, we focus on paths, cycles, complete bipartite graphs and trees.

preprint2015arXiv

On the complexity of computing the kk-metric dimension of graphs

Given a connected graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), a set S⊆VS\subseteq V is a kk-metric generator for GG if for any two different vertices u,v∈Vu,v\in V, there exist at least kk vertices w1,...,wk∈Sw_1,...,w_k\in S such that dG(u,wi)≠dG(v,wi)d_G(u,w_i)\ne d_G(v,w_i) for every i∈{1,...,k}i\in \{1,...,k\}. A metric generator of minimum cardinality is called a kk-metric basis and its cardinality the kk-metric dimension of GG. We study some problems regarding the complexity of some kk-metric dimension problems. For instance, we show that the problem of computing the kk-metric dimension of graphs is NPNP-Complete. However, the problem is solved in linear time for the particular case of trees.

preprint2015arXiv

On the strong metric dimension of Cartesian sum graphs

A vertex ww of a connected graph GG strongly resolves two vertices u,v∈V(G)u,v\in V(G), if there exists some shortest u−wu-w path containing vv or some shortest v−wv-w path containing uu. A set SS of vertices is a strong metric generator for GG if every pair of vertices of GG is strongly resolved by some vertex of SS. The smallest cardinality of a strong metric generator for GG is called the strong metric dimension of GG. In this paper we obtain several tight bounds or closed formulae for the strong metric dimension of the Cartesian sum of graphs in terms of the strong metric dimension, clique number or twins-free clique number of its factor graphs.

preprint2015arXiv

Resolvability and Strong Resolvability in the Direct Product of Graphs

Given a connected graph GG, a vertex w∈V(G)w\in V(G) distinguishes two different vertices u,vu,v of GG if the distances between ww and uu and between ww and vv are different. Moreover, ww strongly resolves the pair u,vu,v if there exists some shortest u−wu-w path containing vv or some shortest v−wv-w path containing uu. A set WW of vertices is a (strong) metric generator for GG if every pair of vertices of GG is (strongly resolved) distinguished by some vertex of WW. The smallest cardinality of a (strong) metric generator for GG is called the (strong) metric dimension of GG. In this article we study the (strong) metric dimension of some families of direct product graphs.

preprint2015arXiv

The k-metric dimension of a graph

As a generalization of the concept of a metric basis, this article introduces the notion of kk-metric basis in graphs. Given a connected graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), a set S⊆VS\subseteq V is said to be a kk-metric generator for GG if the elements of any pair of different vertices of GG are distinguished by at least kk elements of SS, i.e., for any two different vertices u,v∈Vu,v\in V, there exist at least kk vertices w1,w2,...,wk∈Sw_1,w_2,...,w_k\in S such that dG(u,wi)≠dG(v,wi)d_G(u,w_i)\ne d_G(v,w_i) for every i∈{1,...,k}i\in \{1,...,k\}. A metric generator of minimum cardinality is called a kk-metric basis and its cardinality the kk-metric dimension of GG. A connected graph GG is kk-metric dimensional if kk is the largest integer such that there exists a kk-metric basis for GG. We give a necessary and sufficient condition for a graph to be kk-metric dimensional and we obtain several results on the kk-metric dimension.

preprint2014arXiv

Closed formulae for the strong metric dimension of lexicographic product graphs

Given a connected graph GG, a vertex w∈V(G)w\in V(G) strongly resolves two vertices u,v∈V(G)u,v\in V(G) if there exists some shortest u−wu-w path containing vv or some shortest v−wv-w path containing uu. A set SS of vertices is a strong metric generator for GG if every pair of vertices of GG is strongly resolved by some vertex of SS. The smallest cardinality of a strong metric generator for GG is called the strong metric dimension of GG. In this paper we obtain several relationships between the strong metric dimension of the lexicographic product of graphs and the strong metric dimension of its factor graphs.

preprint2013arXiv

On the partition dimension of unicyclic graphs

Given an ordered partition Π={P1,P2,...,Pt}Π=\{P_1,P_2, ...,P_t\} of the vertex set VV of a connected graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), the \emph{partition representation} of a vertex v∈Vv\in V with respect to the partition ΠΠ is the vector r(v∣Π)=(d(v,P1),d(v,P2),...,d(v,Pt))r(v|Π)=(d(v,P_1),d(v,P_2),...,d(v,P_t)), where d(v,Pi)d(v,P_i) represents the distance between the vertex vv and the set PiP_i. A partition ΠΠ of VV is a \emph{resolving partition} if different vertices of GG have different partition representations, i.e., for every pair of vertices u,v∈Vu,v\in V, r(u∣Π)≠r(v∣Π)r(u|Π)\ne r(v|Π). The \emph{partition dimension} of GG is the minimum number of sets in any resolving partition for GG. In this paper we obtain several tight bounds on the partition dimension of unicyclic graphs.

preprint2013arXiv

On the strong metric dimension of Cartesian and direct products of graphs

Let GG be a connected graph. A vertex ww {\em strongly resolves} a pair u,vu, v of vertices of GG if there exists some shortest u−wu-w path containing vv or some shortest v−wv-w path containing uu. A set WW of vertices is a {\em strong resolving set} for GG if every pair of vertices of GG is strongly resolved by some vertex of WW. The smallest cardinality of a strong resolving set for GG is called the {\em strong metric dimension} of GG. It is known that the problem of computing the strong metric dimension of a graph is NP-hard. In this paper we obtain closed formulae for the strong metric dimension of several families of Cartesian product graphs and direct product graphs.

preprint2013arXiv

On the strong metric generators of strong product graphs

Let GG be a connected graph. A vertex w∈V(G)w\in V(G) strongly resolves two vertices u,v∈V(G)u,v\in V(G) if there exists some shortest u−wu-w path containing vv or some shortest v−wv-w path containing uu. A set SS of vertices is a strong metric generator for GG if every pair of vertices of GG is strongly resolved by some vertex of SS. The smallest cardinality of a strong metric generator for GG is called the strong metric dimension of GG. It is well known that the problem of computing this invariant is NP-hard. In this paper we study the problem of finding exact values or sharp bounds for the strong metric dimension of strong product graphs and express these in terms of invariants of the factor graphs.

preprint2013arXiv

Strong metric dimension of rooted product graphs

Let GG be a connected graph. A vertex ww strongly resolves a pair uu, vv of vertices of GG if there exists some shortest u−wu-w path containing vv or some shortest v−wv-w path containing uu. A set WW of vertices is a strong resolving set for GG if every pair of vertices of GG is strongly resolved by some vertex of WW. The smallest cardinality of a strong resolving set for GG is called the strong metric dimension of GG. It is known that the problem of computing this invariant is NP-hard. This suggests finding the strong metric dimension for special classes of graphs or obtaining good bounds on this invariant. In this paper we study the problem of finding exact values or sharp bounds for the strong metric dimension of rooted product of graphs and express these in terms of invariants of the factor graphs.

preprint2013arXiv

The metric dimension of strong product graphs

For an ordered subset S={s1,s2,…sk}S = \{s_1, s_2,\dots s_k\} of vertices and a vertex uu in a connected graph GG, the metric representation of uu with respect to SS is the ordered kk-tuple r(u∣S)=(dG(v,s1),dG(v,s2),…, r(u|S)=(d_G(v,s_1), d_G(v,s_2),\dots, dG(v,sk))d_G(v,s_k)), where dG(x,y)d_G(x,y) represents the distance between the vertices xx and yy. The set SS is a metric generator for GG if every two different vertices of GG have distinct metric representations. A minimum metric generator is called a metric basis for GG and its cardinality, dim(G)dim(G), the metric dimension of GG. It is well known that the problem of finding the metric dimension of a graph is NP-Hard. In this paper we obtain closed formulae and tight bounds for the metric dimension of strong product graphs.

preprint2012arXiv

Analogies between the geodetic number and the Steiner number of some classes of graphs

A set of vertices SS of a graph GG is a geodetic set of GG if every vertex v∉Sv\not\in S lies on a shortest path between two vertices of SS. The minimum cardinality of a geodetic set of GG is the geodetic number of GG and it is denoted by g(G)g(G). A Steiner set of GG is a set of vertices WW of GG such that every vertex of GG belongs to the set of vertices of a connected subgraph of minimum size containing the vertices of WW. The minimum cardinality of a Steiner set of GG is the Steiner number of GG and it is denoted by s(G)s(G). Let GG and HH be two graphs and let nn be the order of GG. The corona product G⊙HG\odot H is defined as the graph obtained from GG and HH by taking one copy of GG and nn copies of HH and joining by an edge each vertex from the ithi^{th}-copy of HH with the ithi^{th}-vertex of GG. We study the geodetic number and the Steiner number of corona product graphs. We show that if GG is a connected graph of order n≥2n\ge 2 and HH is a non complete graph, then g(G⊙H)≤s(G⊙H)g(G\odot H)\le s(G\odot H), which partially solve the open problem presented in [\emph{Discrete Mathematics} \textbf{280} (2004) 259--263] related to characterize families of graphs GG satisfying that g(G)≤s(G)g(G)\le s(G).

preprint2012arXiv

Computing global offensive alliances in Cartesian product graphs

A global offensive alliance in a graph GG is a set SS of vertices with the property that every vertex not belonging to SS has at least one more neighbor in SS than it has outside of SS. The global offensive alliance number of GG, γo(G)γ_o(G), is the minimum cardinality of a global offensive alliance in GG. A set SS of vertices of a graph GG is a dominating set for GG if every vertex not belonging to SS has at least one neighbor in SS. The domination number of GG, γ(G)γ(G), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of GG. In this work we obtain closed formulas for the global offensive alliance number of several families of Cartesian product graphs, we also prove that γo(G□H)≥γ(G)γo(H)2γ_o(G\square H)\ge \frac{γ(G)γ_o(H)}{2} for any graphs GG and HH and we show that if GG has an efficient dominating set, then γo(G□H)≥γ(G)γo(H).γ_o(G\square H)\ge γ(G)γ_o(H). Moreover, we present a Vizing-like conjecture for the global offensive alliance number and we prove it for several families of graphs.

preprint2012arXiv

On the strong metric dimension of corona product graphs and join graphs

Let GG be a connected graph. A vertex ww strongly resolves a pair uu, vv of vertices of GG if there exists some shortest u−wu-w path containing vv or some shortest v−wv-w path containing uu. A set WW of vertices is a strong resolving set for GG if every pair of vertices of GG is strongly resolved by some vertex of WW. The smallest cardinality of a strong resolving set for GG is called the strong metric dimension of GG. It is known that the problem of computing this invariant is NP-hard. It is therefore desirable to reduce the problem of computing the strong metric dimension of product graphs, to the problem of computing some parameter of the factor graphs. We show that the problem of finding the strong metric dimension of the corona product G⊙HG\odot H, of two graphs GG and HH, can be transformed to the problem of finding certain clique number of HH. As a consequence of the study we show that if HH has diameter two, then the strong metric dimension of G⊙HG\odot H is obtained from the strong metric dimension of HH and, if HH is not connected or its diameter is greater than two, then the strong metric dimension of G⊙HG\odot H is obtained from the strong metric dimension of K1⊙HK_1\odot H, where K1K_1 denotes the trivial graph. The strong metric dimension of join graphs is also studied.

preprint2011arXiv

Alliance free sets in Cartesian product graphs

Let G=(V,E)G=(V,E) be a graph. For a non-empty subset of vertices S⊆VS\subseteq V, and vertex v∈Vv\in V, let δS(v)=∣{u∈S:uv∈E}∣δ_S(v)=|\{u\in S:uv\in E\}| denote the cardinality of the set of neighbors of vv in SS, and let Sˉ=V−S\bar{S}=V-S. Consider the following condition: {equation}\label{alliancecondition} δ_S(v)\ge δ_{\bar{S}}(v)+k, \{equation} which states that a vertex vv has at least kk more neighbors in SS than it has in Sˉ\bar{S}. A set S⊆VS\subseteq V that satisfies Condition (\ref{alliancecondition}) for every vertex v∈Sv \in S is called a \emph{defensive} kk-\emph{alliance}; for every vertex vv in the neighborhood of SS is called an \emph{offensive} kk-\emph{alliance}. A subset of vertices S⊆VS\subseteq V, is a \emph{powerful} kk-\emph{alliance} if it is both a defensive kk-alliance and an offensive (k+2)(k +2)-alliance. Moreover, a subset X⊂VX\subset V is a defensive (an offensive or a powerful) kk-alliance free set if XX does not contain any defensive (offensive or powerful, respectively) kk-alliance. In this article we study the relationships between defensive (offensive, powerful) kk-alliance free sets in Cartesian product graphs and defensive (offensive, powerful) kk-alliance free sets in the factor graphs.

preprint2011arXiv

On the partition dimension of trees

Given an ordered partition Π={P1,P2,...,Pt}Π=\{P_1,P_2, ...,P_t\} of the vertex set VV of a connected graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), the \emph{partition representation} of a vertex v∈Vv\in V with respect to the partition ΠΠ is the vector r(v∣Π)=(d(v,P1),d(v,P2),...,d(v,Pt))r(v|Π)=(d(v,P_1),d(v,P_2),...,d(v,P_t)), where d(v,Pi)d(v,P_i) represents the distance between the vertex vv and the set PiP_i. A partition ΠΠ of VV is a \emph{resolving partition} of GG if different vertices of GG have different partition representations, i.e., for every pair of vertices u,v∈Vu,v\in V, r(u∣Π)≠r(v∣Π)r(u|Π)\ne r(v|Π). The \emph{partition dimension} of GG is the minimum number of sets in any resolving partition of GG. In this paper we obtain several tight bounds on the partition dimension of trees.

preprint2011arXiv

Roman domination in Cartesian product graphs and strong product graphs

A set SS of vertices of a graph GG is a dominating set for GG if every vertex outside of SS is adjacent to at least one vertex belonging to SS. The minimum cardinality of a dominating set for GG is called the domination number of GG. A map f:V→{0,1,2}f : V \rightarrow \{0, 1, 2\} is a Roman dominating function on a graph GG if for every vertex vv with f(v)=0f(v) = 0, there exists a vertex uu, adjacent to vv, such that f(u)=2f(u) = 2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is given by f(V)=∑u∈Vf(u)f(V) =\sum_{u\in V}f(u). The minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on GG is called the Roman domination number of GG. In this article we study the Roman domination number of Cartesian product graphs and strong product graphs. More precisely, we study the relationships between the Roman domination number of product graphs and the (Roman) domination number of the factors.

preprint2010arXiv

A note on the partition dimension of Cartesian product graphs

Let G=(V,E)G=(V,E) be a connected graph. The distance between two vertices u,v∈Vu,v\in V, denoted by d(u,v)d(u, v), is the length of a shortest u−vu-v path in GG. The distance between a vertex v∈Vv\in V and a subset P⊂VP\subset V is defined as min{d(v,x):x∈P}min\{d(v, x): x \in P\}, and it is denoted by d(v,P)d(v, P). An ordered partition {P1,P2,...,Pt}\{P_1,P_2, ...,P_t\} of vertices of a graph GG, is a \emph{resolving partition}of GG, if all the distance vectors (d(v,P1),d(v,P2),...,d(v,Pt))(d(v,P_1),d(v,P_2),...,d(v,P_t)) are different. The \emph{partition dimension} of GG, denoted by pd(G)pd(G), is the minimum number of sets in any resolving partition of GG. In this article we study the partition dimension of Cartesian product graphs. More precisely, we show that for all pairs of connected graphs G,HG, H, pd(G×H)≤pd(G)+pd(H)pd(G\times H)\le pd(G)+pd(H) and pd(G×H)≤pd(G)+dim(H).pd(G\times H)\le pd(G)+dim(H). Consequently, we show that pd(G×H)≤dim(G)+dim(H)+1.pd(G\times H)\le dim(G)+dim(H)+1.

preprint2010arXiv

Partitioning a graph into defensive k-alliances

A defensive kk-alliance in a graph is a set SS of vertices with the property that every vertex in SS has at least kk more neighbors in SS than it has outside of SS. A defensive kk-alliance SS is called global if it forms a dominating set. In this paper we study the problem of partitioning the vertex set of a graph into (global) defensive kk-alliances. The (global) defensive kk-alliance partition number of a graph Γ=(V,E)Γ=(V,E), (ψkgd(Γ)ψ_{k}^{gd}(Γ)) ψkd(Γ)ψ_k^{d}(Γ), is defined to be the maximum number of sets in a partition of VV such that each set is a (global) defensive kk-alliance. We obtain tight bounds on ψkd(Γ)ψ_k^{d}(Γ) and ψkgd(Γ)ψ_{k}^{gd}(Γ) in terms of several parameters of the graph including the order, size, maximum and minimum degree, the algebraic connectivity and the isoperimetric number. Moreover, we study the close relationships that exist among partitions of Γ1×Γ2Γ_1\times Γ_2 into (global) defensive (k1+k2)(k_1+k_2)-alliances and partitions of ΓiΓ_i into (global) defensive kik_i-alliances, i∈{1,2}i\in \{1,2\}.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.