Paper detail

k-Metric Antidimension: a Privacy Measure for Social Graphs

Let $G = (V, E)$ be a simple connected graph and $S = \{w_1, \cdots, w_t\} \subseteq V$ an ordered subset of vertices. The metric representation of a vertex $u\in V$ with respect to $S$ is the $t$-vector $r(u|S) = (d_G(u, w_1), \cdots, d_G(u, w_t))$, where $d_G(u, v)$ represents the length of a shortest $u-v$ path in $G$. The set $S$ is called a resolving set for $G$ if $r(u|S) = r(v|S)$ implies $u = v$ for every $u, v \in V$. The smallest cardinality of a resolving set is the metric dimension of $G$. In this article we propose, to the best of our knowledge, a new problem in Graph Theory that resembles to the aforementioned metric dimension problem. We call $S$ a $k$-antiresolving set if $k$ is the largest positive integer such that for every vertex $v \in V-S$ there exist other $k-1$ different vertices $v_1, \cdots, v_{k-1} \in V-S$ with $r(v|S) = r(v_1|S) = \cdots = r(v_{k-1}|S)$, \emph{i.e.}, $v$ and $v_1, \cdots, v_{k-1}$ have the same metric representation with respect to $S$. The $k$-metric antidimension of $G$ is the minimum cardinality among all the $k$-antiresolving sets for $G$. In this article, we introduce a novel privacy measure, named $(k, \ell)$-anonymity and based on the $k$-metric antidimension problem, aimed at evaluating the resistance of social graphs to active attacks. We, therefore, propose a true-biased algorithm for computing the $k$-metric antidimension of random graphs. The success rate of our algorithm, according to empirical results, is above $80 \%$ and $90 \%$ when looking for a $k$-antiresolving basis and a $k$-antiresolving set respectively. We also investigate theoretical properties of the $k$-antiresolving sets and the $k$-metric antidimension of graphs. In particular, we focus on paths, cycles, complete bipartite graphs and trees.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.