Abstract

Let G=(V,E)G=(V,E) be a graph. For a non-empty subset of vertices S⊆VS\subseteq V, and vertex v∈Vv\in V, let δS(v)=∣{u∈S:uv∈E}∣δ_S(v)=|\{u\in S:uv\in E\}| denote the cardinality of the set of neighbors of vv in SS, and let Sˉ=V−S\bar{S}=V-S. Consider the following condition: {equation}\label{alliancecondition} δ_S(v)\ge δ_{\bar{S}}(v)+k, \{equation} which states that a vertex vv has at least kk more neighbors in SS than it has in Sˉ\bar{S}. A set S⊆VS\subseteq V that satisfies Condition (\ref{alliancecondition}) for every vertex v∈Sv \in S is called a \emph{defensive} kk-\emph{alliance}; for every vertex vv in the neighborhood of SS is called an \emph{offensive} kk-\emph{alliance}. A subset of vertices S⊆VS\subseteq V, is a \emph{powerful} kk-\emph{alliance} if it is both a defensive kk-alliance and an offensive (k+2)(k +2)-alliance. Moreover, a subset X⊂VX\subset V is a defensive (an offensive or a powerful) kk-alliance free set if XX does not contain any defensive (offensive or powerful, respectively) kk-alliance. In this article we study the relationships between defensive (offensive, powerful) kk-alliance free sets in Cartesian product graphs and defensive (offensive, powerful) kk-alliance free sets in the factor graphs.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.