Nielsen equivalence in small cancellation groups
Let G be a group given by the presentation [<a_1,...,a_k,b_1,... b_k\,| a_i=u_i(\bar b), b_i=v_i(\bar a) \hbox{for} 1\le i\le k>,] where k≥2 and where the ui∈F(b1,...,bk) and wi∈F(a1,...,ak) are random words. Generically such a group is a small cancellation group and it is clear that (a1,...,ak) and (b1,...,bk) are generating n-tuples for G. We prove that for generic choices of u1,...,uk and v1,...,vk the "once-stabilized" tuples (a1,...,ak,1) and (b1,...,bk,1) are not Nielsen equivalent in G. This provides a counter-example for a Wiegold-type conjecture in the setting of word-hyperbolic groups. We conjecture that in the above construction at least k stabilizations are needed to make the tuples (a1,...,ak) and (b1,...,bk) Nielsen equivalent.