Researcher profile

Igor Cialenco

Igor Cialenco contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Robo-Advising in Motion: A Model Predictive Control Approach

Robo-advisors (RAs) are automated portfolio management systems that complement traditional financial advisors by offering lower fees and smaller initial investment requirements. While most existing RAs rely on static, one-period allocation methods, we propose a dynamic, multi-period asset-allocation framework that leverages Model Predictive Control (MPC) to generate suboptimal but practically effective strategies. Our approach combines a Hidden Markov Model with Black-Litterman (BL) methodology to forecast asset returns and covariances, and incorporates practically important constraints, including turnover limits, transaction costs, and target portfolio allocations. We study two predominant optimality criteria in wealth management: dynamic mean-variance (MV) and dynamic risk-budgeting (MRB). Numerical experiments demonstrate that MPC-based strategies consistently outperform myopic approaches, with MV providing flexible and diversified portfolios, while MRB delivers smoother allocations less sensitive to key parameters. These findings highlight the trade-offs between adaptability and stability in practical robo-advising design.

preprint2022arXiv

Parameter estimation for semilinear SPDEs from local measurements

This work contributes to the limited literature on estimating the diffusivity or drift coefficient of nonlinear SPDEs driven by additive noise. Assuming that the solution is measured locally in space and over a finite time interval, we show that the augmented maximum likelihood estimator introduced in Altmeyer, Reiss (2020) retains its asymptotic properties when used for semilinear SPDEs that satisfy some abstract, and verifiable, conditions. The proofs of asymptotic results are based on splitting the solution in linear and nonlinear parts and fine regularity properties in $L^p$-spaces. The obtained general results are applied to particular classes of equations, including stochastic reaction-diffusion equations. The stochastic Burgers equation, as an example with first order nonlinearity, is an interesting borderline case of the general results, and is treated by a Wiener chaos expansion. We conclude with numerical examples that validate the theoretical results.

preprint2022arXiv

Risk Filtering and Risk-Averse Control of Markovian Systems Subject to Model Uncertainty

We consider a Markov decision process subject to model uncertainty in a Bayesian framework, where we assume that the state process is observed but its law is unknown to the observer. In addition, while the state process and the controls are observed at time $t$, the actual cost that may depend on the unknown parameter is not known at time $t$. The controller optimizes total cost by using a family of special risk measures, that we call risk filters and that are appropriately defined to take into account the model uncertainty of the controlled system. These key features lead to non-standard and non-trivial risk-averse control problems, for which we derive the Bellman principle of optimality. We illustrate the general theory on two practical examples: optimal investment and clinical trials.

preprint2021arXiv

Statistical analysis of discretely sampled semilinear SPDEs: a power variation approach

Motivated by problems from statistical analysis for discretely sampled SPDEs, first we derive central limit theorems for higher order finite differences applied to stochastic process with arbitrary finitely regular paths. These results are proved by using the notion of $Δ$-power variations, introduced herein, along with the Hölder-Zygmund norms. Consequently, we prove a new central limit theorem for $Δ$-power variations of the iterated integrals of a fractional Brownian motion (fBm). These abstract results, besides being of independent interest, in the second part of the paper are applied to estimation of the drift and volatility coefficients of semilinear stochastic partial differential equations in dimension one, driven by an additive Gaussian noise white in time and possibly colored in space. In particular, we solve the earlier conjecture from Cialenco, Kim, Lototsky (2019) about existence of a nontrivial bias in the estimators derived by naive approximations of derivatives by finite differences. We give an explicit formula for the bias and derive the convergence rates of the corresponding estimators. Theoretical results are illustrated by numerical examples.

preprint2020arXiv

Time-inconsistent Markovian control problems under model uncertainty with application to the mean-variance portfolio selection

In this paper we study a class of time-inconsistent terminal Markovian control problems in discrete time subject to model uncertainty. We combine the concept of the sub-game perfect strategies with the adaptive robust stochastic to tackle the theoretical aspects of the considered stochastic control problem. Consequently, as an important application of the theoretical results, by applying a machine learning algorithm we solve numerically the mean-variance portfolio selection problem under the model uncertainty.