Paper detail

Dynamic Conic Finance via Backward Stochastic Difference Equations

We present an arbitrage free theoretical framework for modeling bid and ask prices of dividend paying securities in a discrete time setup using theory of dynamic acceptability indices. In the first part of the paper we develop the theory of dynamic subscale invariant performance measures, on a general probability space, and discrete time setup. We prove a representation theorem of such measures in terms of a family of dynamic convex risk measures, and provide a representation of dynamic risk measures in terms of g-expectations, and solutions of BS$Δ$Es with convex drivers. We study the existence and uniqueness of the solutions, and derive a comparison theorem for corresponding BS$Δ$Es. In the second part of the paper we discuss a market model for dividend paying securities by introducing the pricing operators that are defined in terms of dynamic acceptability indices, and find various properties of these operators. Using these pricing operators, we define the bid and ask prices for the underlying securities and then for derivatives in this market. We show that the obtained market model is arbitrage free, and we also prove a series of properties of these prices.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.