Researcher profile

Guoyu Hu

Guoyu Hu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

FAVOR: Efficient Filter-Agnostic Vector ANNS Based on Selectivity-Aware Exclusion Distances

Modern retrieval systems increasingly require integrating approximate nearest neighbor search (ANNS) with complex attribute filtering to handle hybrid queries in applications such as recommendation systems and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). While HNSW-based inline-filtering methods show promise, existing approaches struggle to deliver high throughput under low-selectivity scenarios while balancing search efficiency, filtering generality, and index connectivity. To address these challenges, we propose FAVOR, an efficient filter-agnostic vector ANNS that supports arbitrary filtering conditions while maintaining stable performance across varying selectivity levels. FAVOR introduces three novel features: (1) an integrated architecture that unifies selectivity estimation and filtered ANNS execution, providing a cohesive solution for hybrid vector-attribute queries; (2) a HNSW-based inline-filtering algorithm that introduces an exclusion distance mechanism to dynamically reshape the vector distance distribution, pushing non-target vectors away from the query while promoting valid candidates toward the query, thus improving search efficiency without compromising generality or graph connectivity; and (3) a selectivity-driven search selector that estimates query selectivity and dynamically routes queries between a pre-filtering brute-force algorithm for low-selectivity cases and an optimized HNSW-based search algorithm for other scenarios, ensuring consistent performance. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that FAVOR achieves a 1.3-5$\times$ higher QPS at $Recall@10 = 95\%$ compared to state-of-the-art methods for arbitrary filtering conditions, while maintaining competitive performance even against tailored solutions in some filtering conditions.

preprint2022arXiv

Serverless Data Science -- Are We There Yet? A Case Study of Model Serving

Machine learning (ML) is an important part of modern data science applications. Data scientists today have to manage the end-to-end ML life cycle that includes both model training and model serving, the latter of which is essential, as it makes their works available to end-users. Systems of model serving require high performance, low cost, and ease of management. Cloud providers are already offering model serving choices, including managed services and self-rented servers. Recently, serverless computing, whose advantages include high elasticity and a fine-grained cost model, brings another option for model serving. Our goal in this paper is to examine the viability of serverless as a mainstream model serving platform. To this end, we first conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the performance and cost of serverless against other model serving systems on Amazon Web Service and Google Cloud Platform. We find that serverless outperforms many cloud-based alternatives. Further, there are settings under which it even achieves better performance than GPU-based systems. Next, we present the design space of serverless model serving, which comprises multiple dimensions, including cloud platforms, serving runtimes, and other function-specific parameters. For each dimension, we analyze the impact of different choices and provide suggestions for data scientists to better utilize serverless model serving. Finally, we discuss challenges and opportunities in building a more practical serverless model serving system.