BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Gregory Valiant

Gregory Valiant appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Machine LearningData Structures and Algorithmsmath.STStatistics TheoryComputational ComplexityCryptography and SecurityInformation Theorymath.ITArtificial IntelligenceComputation and LanguageComputer Science and Game TheoryDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingHuman-Computer Interactionmath.PRNetworking and Internet ArchitecturePopulations and Evolution

Catalog footprint

What is connected

15works
16topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

15 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Attainability of Two-Point Testing Rates for Finite-Sample Location Estimation

Le Cam's two-point testing method yields perhaps the simplest lower bound for estimating the mean of a distribution: roughly, if it is impossible to well-distinguish a distribution centered at $μ$ from the same distribution centered at $μ+Δ$, then it is impossible to estimate the mean by better than $Δ/2$. It is setting-dependent whether or not a nearly matching upper bound is attainable. We study the conditions under which the two-point testing lower bound can be attained for univariate mean estimation; both in the setting of location estimation (where the distribution is known up to translation) and adaptive location estimation (unknown distribution). Roughly, we will say an estimate nearly attains the two-point testing lower bound if it incurs error that is at most polylogarithmically larger than the Hellinger modulus of continuity for $\tildeΩ(n)$ samples. Adaptive location estimation is particularly interesting as some distributions admit much better guarantees than sub-Gaussian rates (e.g. $\operatorname{Unif}(μ-1,μ+1)$ permits error $Θ(\frac{1}{n})$, while the sub-Gaussian rate is $Θ(\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}})$), yet it is not obvious whether these rates may be adaptively attained by one unified approach. Our main result designs an algorithm that nearly attains the two-point testing rate for mixtures of symmetric, log-concave distributions with a common mean. Moreover, this algorithm runs in near-linear time and is parameter-free. In contrast, we show the two-point testing rate is not nearly attainable even for symmetric, unimodal distributions. We complement this with results for location estimation, showing the two-point testing rate is nearly attainable for unimodal distributions, but unattainable for symmetric distributions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

On the Entropy Calibration of Language Models

We study the problem of entropy calibration, which asks whether a language model's entropy over generations matches its log loss on human text. Past work found that models are miscalibrated, with entropy per step increasing as generations grow longer, due to error accumulation. To calibrate the model and improve text quality, it has become standard practice to truncate the distribution, but this approach reduces output diversity, which we would like to avoid. Therefore, in this paper, we ask: does miscalibration improve automatically with scale, and if not, is it theoretically possible to calibrate without tradeoffs? To build intuition, we first study a simplified theoretical setting to characterize the scaling behavior of miscalibration with respect to dataset size. We find that the rate of scaling depends on the power law exponent of the data distribution -- in particular, for a power law exponent close to 1, the scaling exponent is close to 0, meaning that miscalibration improves very slowly with scale. Next, we measure miscalibration empirically in language models ranging from 0.5B to 70B parameters. We find that the observed scaling behavior is similar to what is predicted theoretically: our fitted scaling exponents for text are close to 0, meaning that larger models accumulate error at a similar rate as smaller ones. This scaling (or, lack thereof) provides one explanation for why we sample from larger models with similar amounts of truncation as smaller models, even though the larger models are of higher quality. However, truncation is not a satisfying solution because it comes at the cost of increased log loss. In theory, is it even possible to reduce entropy while preserving log loss? We prove that it is possible, if we assume access to a black box which can fit models to predict the future entropy of text.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

From Sand to Flour: The Next Leap in Granular Computing with NanoSort

The granularity of distributed computing is limited by communication time: there is no point in farming out smaller and smaller tasks if the communication overhead dominates the decrease in processing time due to the added parallelism. In this work, we leverage the low communication latency of a new NIC/CPU hardware design, the nanoPU, to explore a new extreme of granularity in distributed computation, where a problem is partitioned into tens of thousands of nanosecond-scale tasks. To evaluate the feasibility and practicality of extremely fine-grained computing, we built NanoSort, a distributed sorting algorithm running on the nanoPU. Using cycle-accurate FireSim simulations of 65,536 nanoPU cores, we show that NanoSort can sort 1M keys in 68$μ$s, an order of magnitude faster than MilliSort, the current state-of-the-art.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

On Misspecification in Prediction Problems and Robustness via Improper Learning

We study probabilistic prediction games when the underlying model is misspecified, investigating the consequences of predicting using an incorrect parametric model. We show that for a broad class of loss functions and parametric families of distributions, the regret of playing a "proper" predictor -- one from the putative model class -- relative to the best predictor in the same model class has lower bound scaling at least as $\sqrt{γn}$, where $γ$ is a measure of the model misspecification to the true distribution in terms of total variation distance. In contrast, using an aggregation-based (improper) learner, one can obtain regret $d \log n$ for any underlying generating distribution, where $d$ is the dimension of the parameter; we exhibit instances in which this is unimprovable even over the family of all learners that may play distributions in the convex hull of the parametric family. These results suggest that simple strategies for aggregating multiple learners together should be more robust, and several experiments conform to this hypothesis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Implicit regularization for deep neural networks driven by an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck like process

We consider networks, trained via stochastic gradient descent to minimize $\ell_2$ loss, with the training labels perturbed by independent noise at each iteration. We characterize the behavior of the training dynamics near any parameter vector that achieves zero training error, in terms of an implicit regularization term corresponding to the sum over the data points, of the squared $\ell_2$ norm of the gradient of the model with respect to the parameter vector, evaluated at each data point. This holds for networks of any connectivity, width, depth, and choice of activation function. We interpret this implicit regularization term for three simple settings: matrix sensing, two layer ReLU networks trained on one-dimensional data, and two layer networks with sigmoid activations trained on a single datapoint. For these settings, we show why this new and general implicit regularization effect drives the networks towards "simple" models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Avoiding Imposters and Delinquents: Adversarial Crowdsourcing and Peer Prediction

We consider a crowdsourcing model in which $n$ workers are asked to rate the quality of $n$ items previously generated by other workers. An unknown set of $αn$ workers generate reliable ratings, while the remaining workers may behave arbitrarily and possibly adversarially. The manager of the experiment can also manually evaluate the quality of a small number of items, and wishes to curate together almost all of the high-quality items with at most an $ε$ fraction of low-quality items. Perhaps surprisingly, we show that this is possible with an amount of work required of the manager, and each worker, that does not scale with $n$: the dataset can be curated with $\tilde{O}\Big(\frac{1}{βα^3ε^4}\Big)$ ratings per worker, and $\tilde{O}\Big(\frac{1}{βε^2}\Big)$ ratings by the manager, where $β$ is the fraction of high-quality items. Our results extend to the more general setting of peer prediction, including peer grading in online classrooms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Information Theoretically Secure Databases

We introduce the notion of a database system that is information theoretically "Secure In Between Accesses"--a database system with the properties that 1) users can efficiently access their data, and 2) while a user is not accessing their data, the user's information is information theoretically secure to malicious agents, provided that certain requirements on the maintenance of the database are realized. We stress that the security guarantee is information theoretic and everlasting: it relies neither on unproved hardness assumptions, nor on the assumption that the adversary is computationally or storage bounded. We propose a realization of such a database system and prove that a user's stored information, in between times when it is being legitimately accessed, is information theoretically secure both to adversaries who interact with the database in the prescribed manner, as well as to adversaries who have installed a virus that has access to the entire database and communicates with the adversary. The central idea behind our design is the construction of a "re-randomizing database" that periodically changes the internal representation of the information that is being stored. To ensure security, these remappings of the representation of the data must be made sufficiently often in comparison to the amount of information that is being communicated from the database between remappings and the amount of local memory in the database that a virus may preserve during the remappings. The core of the proof of the security guarantee is the following communication/data tradeoff for the problem of learning sparse parities from uniformly random $n$-bit examples: any algorithm that can learn a parity of size $k$ with probability at least $p$ and extracts at most $r$ bits of information from each example, must see at least $p\cdot \left(\frac{n}{r}\right)^{k/2} c_k$ examples.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Instance Optimal Learning

We consider the following basic learning task: given independent draws from an unknown distribution over a discrete support, output an approximation of the distribution that is as accurate as possible in $\ell_1$ distance (i.e. total variation or statistical distance). Perhaps surprisingly, it is often possible to "de-noise" the empirical distribution of the samples to return an approximation of the true distribution that is significantly more accurate than the empirical distribution, without relying on any prior assumptions on the distribution. We present an instance optimal learning algorithm which optimally performs this de-noising for every distribution for which such a de-noising is possible. More formally, given $n$ independent draws from a distribution $p$, our algorithm returns a labelled vector whose expected distance from $p$ is equal to the minimum possible expected error that could be obtained by any algorithm that knows the true unlabeled vector of probabilities of distribution $p$ and simply needs to assign labels, up to an additive subconstant term that is independent of $p$ and goes to zero as $n$ gets large. One conceptual implication of this result is that for large samples, Bayesian assumptions on the "shape" or bounds on the tail probabilities of a distribution over discrete support are not helpful for the task of learning the distribution. As a consequence of our techniques, we also show that given a set of $n$ samples from an arbitrary distribution, one can accurately estimate the expected number of distinct elements that will be observed in a sample of any size up to $n \log n$. This sort of extrapolation is practically relevant, particularly to domains such as genomics where it is important to understand how much more might be discovered given larger sample sizes, and we are optimistic that our approach is practically viable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Testing Closeness With Unequal Sized Samples

We consider the problem of closeness testing for two discrete distributions in the practically relevant setting of \emph{unequal} sized samples drawn from each of them. Specifically, given a target error parameter $\varepsilon > 0$, $m_1$ independent draws from an unknown distribution $p,$ and $m_2$ draws from an unknown distribution $q$, we describe a test for distinguishing the case that $p=q$ from the case that $||p-q||_1 \geq \varepsilon$. If $p$ and $q$ are supported on at most $n$ elements, then our test is successful with high probability provided $m_1\geq n^{2/3}/\varepsilon^{4/3}$ and $m_2 = Ω(\max\{\frac{n}{\sqrt m_1\varepsilon^2}, \frac{\sqrt n}{\varepsilon^2}\});$ we show that this tradeoff is optimal throughout this range, to constant factors. These results extend the recent work of Chan et al. who established the sample complexity when the two samples have equal sizes, and tightens the results of Acharya et al. by polynomials factors in both $n$ and $\varepsilon$. As a consequence, we obtain an algorithm for estimating the mixing time of a Markov chain on $n$ states up to a $\log n$ factor that uses $\tilde{O}(n^{3/2} τ_{mix})$ queries to a "next node" oracle, improving upon the $\tilde{O}(n^{5/3}τ_{mix})$ query algorithm of Batu et al. Finally, we note that the core of our testing algorithm is a relatively simple statistic that seems to perform well in practice, both on synthetic data and on natural language data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Satisfiability and Evolution

We show that, if truth assignments on $n$ variables reproduce through recombination so that satisfaction of a particular Boolean function confers a small evolutionary advantage, then a polynomially large population over polynomially many generations (polynomial in $n$ and the inverse of the initial satisfaction probability) will end up almost certainly consisting exclusively of satisfying truth assignments. We argue that this theorem sheds light on the problem of novelty in Evolution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Computation in anonymous networks

We identify and investigate a computational model arising in molecular computing, social computing and sensor network. The model is made of of multiple agents who are computationally limited and posses no global information. The agents may represent nodes in a social network, sensors, or molecules in a molecular computer. Assuming that each agent is in one of $k$ states, we say that {\em the system computes} $f:[k]^{n} \to [k]$ if all agents eventually converge to the correct value of $f$. We present number of general results characterizing the computational power of the mode. We further present protocols for computing the plurality function with $O(\log k)$ memory and for approximately counting the number of nodes of a given color with $O(\log \log n)$ memory, where $n$ is the number of agents in the networks. These results are tight.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Least Squares Revisited: Scalable Approaches for Multi-class Prediction

This work provides simple algorithms for multi-class (and multi-label) prediction in settings where both the number of examples n and the data dimension d are relatively large. These robust and parameter free algorithms are essentially iterative least-squares updates and very versatile both in theory and in practice. On the theoretical front, we present several variants with convergence guarantees. Owing to their effective use of second-order structure, these algorithms are substantially better than first-order methods in many practical scenarios. On the empirical side, we present a scalable stagewise variant of our approach, which achieves dramatic computational speedups over popular optimization packages such as Liblinear and Vowpal Wabbit on standard datasets (MNIST and CIFAR-10), while attaining state-of-the-art accuracies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Optimal Algorithms for Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions

We study the question of closeness testing for two discrete distributions. More precisely, given samples from two distributions $p$ and $q$ over an $n$-element set, we wish to distinguish whether $p=q$ versus $p$ is at least $\eps$-far from $q$, in either $\ell_1$ or $\ell_2$ distance. Batu et al. gave the first sub-linear time algorithms for these problems, which matched the lower bounds of Valiant up to a logarithmic factor in $n$, and a polynomial factor of $\eps.$ In this work, we present simple (and new) testers for both the $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ settings, with sample complexity that is information-theoretically optimal, to constant factors, both in the dependence on $n$, and the dependence on $\eps$; for the $\ell_1$ testing problem we establish that the sample complexity is $Θ(\max\{n^{2/3}/\eps^{4/3}, n^{1/2}/\eps^2 \}).$

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Testing $k$-Modal Distributions: Optimal Algorithms via Reductions

We give highly efficient algorithms, and almost matching lower bounds, for a range of basic statistical problems that involve testing and estimating the L_1 distance between two k-modal distributions $p$ and $q$ over the discrete domain $\{1,\dots,n\}$. More precisely, we consider the following four problems: given sample access to an unknown k-modal distribution $p$, Testing identity to a known or unknown distribution: 1. Determine whether $p = q$ (for an explicitly given k-modal distribution $q$) versus $p$ is $\eps$-far from $q$; 2. Determine whether $p=q$ (where $q$ is available via sample access) versus $p$ is $\eps$-far from $q$; Estimating $L_1$ distance ("tolerant testing'') against a known or unknown distribution: 3. Approximate $d_{TV}(p,q)$ to within additive $\eps$ where $q$ is an explicitly given k-modal distribution $q$; 4. Approximate $d_{TV}(p,q)$ to within additive $\eps$ where $q$ is available via sample access. For each of these four problems we give sub-logarithmic sample algorithms, that we show are tight up to additive $\poly(k)$ and multiplicative $\polylog\log n+\polylog k$ factors. Thus our bounds significantly improve the previous results of \cite{BKR:04}, which were for testing identity of distributions (items (1) and (2) above) in the special cases k=0 (monotone distributions) and k=1 (unimodal distributions) and required $O((\log n)^3)$ samples. As our main conceptual contribution, we introduce a new reduction-based approach for distribution-testing problems that lets us obtain all the above results in a unified way. Roughly speaking, this approach enables us to transform various distribution testing problems for k-modal distributions over $\{1,\dots,n\}$ to the corresponding distribution testing problems for unrestricted distributions over a much smaller domain $\{1,\dots,\ell\}$ where $\ell = O(k \log n).$

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Settling the Polynomial Learnability of Mixtures of Gaussians

Given data drawn from a mixture of multivariate Gaussians, a basic problem is to accurately estimate the mixture parameters. We give an algorithm for this problem that has a running time, and data requirement polynomial in the dimension and the inverse of the desired accuracy, with provably minimal assumptions on the Gaussians. As simple consequences of our learning algorithm, we can perform near-optimal clustering of the sample points and density estimation for mixtures of k Gaussians, efficiently. The building blocks of our algorithm are based on the work Kalai et al. [STOC 2010] that gives an efficient algorithm for learning mixtures of two Gaussians by considering a series of projections down to one dimension, and applying the method of moments to each univariate projection. A major technical hurdle in Kalai et al. is showing that one can efficiently learn univariate mixtures of two Gaussians. In contrast, because pathological scenarios can arise when considering univariate projections of mixtures of more than two Gaussians, the bulk of the work in this paper concerns how to leverage an algorithm for learning univariate mixtures (of many Gaussians) to yield an efficient algorithm for learning in high dimensions. Our algorithm employs hierarchical clustering and rescaling, together with delicate methods for backtracking and recovering from failures that can occur in our univariate algorithm. Finally, while the running time and data requirements of our algorithm depend exponentially on the number of Gaussians in the mixture, we prove that such a dependence is necessary.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access