Source author record

Gilles Pisier

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

34works
7topics
4close collaborators

Published work

34 publications

preprint2014arXiv

Quantum Expanders and Geometry of Operator Spaces

We show that there are well separated families of quantum expanders with asymptotically the maximal cardinality allowed by a known upper bound. This has applications to the "growth" of certain operator spaces: It implies asymptotically sharp estimates for the growth of the multiplicity of MNM_N-spaces needed to represent (up to a constant C>1C>1) the MNM_N-version of the nn-dimensional operator Hilbert space OHnOH_n as a direct sum of copies of MNM_N. We show that, when CC is close to 1, this multiplicity grows as exp⁡βnN2\exp{βn N^2} for some constant β>0β>0. The main idea is to relate quantum expanders with "smooth" points on the matricial analogue of the Euclidean unit sphere. This generalizes to operator spaces a classical geometric result on nn-dimensional Hilbert space (corresponding to N=1). In an appendix, we give a quick proof of an inequality (related to Hastings's previous work) on random unitary matrices that is crucial for this paper.

preprint2013arXiv

Martingale inequalities and Operator space structures on LpL_p

We describe a new operator space structure on LpL_p when pp is an even integer and compare it with the one introduced in our previous work using complex interpolation. For the new structure, the Khintchine inequalities and Burkholder's martingale inequalities have a very natural form:\ the span of the Rademacher functions is completely isomorphic to the operator Hilbert space OHOH, and the square function of a martingale difference sequence dnd_n is Σ dn⊗dˉnΣ\ d_n\otimes \bar d_n. Various inequalities from harmonic analysis are also considered in the same operator valued framework. Moreover, the new operator space structure also makes sense for non commutative LpL_p-spaces with analogous results.

preprint2013arXiv

Random Matrices and Subexponential Operator Spaces

We introduce and study a generalization of the notion of exact operator space that we call subexponential. Using Random Matrices we show that the factorization results of Grothendieck type that are known in the exact case all extend to the subexponential case, but we exhibit (a continuum of distinct) examples of non-exact subexponential operator spaces, as well as a C∗C^*-algebra that is subexponential with constant 1 but not exact. We also show that OHOH, R+CR+C and max⁡(ℓ2)\max(\ell_2) (or any other maximal operator space) are not subexponential.

preprint2012arXiv

Examples of non exact 1-subexponential C∗C^*-algebras

This is a complement to our previous paper on the arxiv on quantum expanders and geometry of operator spaces. We show that there is a non-exact C∗C^*-algebra that is 1-subexponential, and we give several other complements to the results of that paper. Our example can be described very simply using random matrices: Let Xj(m)∣j=1,2,...{X_j^{(m)}\mid j=1,2,...} be an i.i.d. sequence of random m×mm\times m-matrices distributed according to the Gaussian Unitary Ensemble (GUE). For each jj let uj(ω)u_j(ω) be the block direct sum defined by uj(ω)=⊕m≥1Xj(m)(ω)∈⊕m≥1Mm.u_j(ω)= \oplus_{m\ge 1} X_j^{(m)}(ω)\in \oplus_{m\ge 1} M_m. Then for almost every ωω the C∗C^*-algebra generated by uj(ω)∣j=1,2,...{u_j(ω) \mid j=1,2,...} is 1-subexponential but is not exact. The GUE is a matrix model for the semi-circular distribution. We can also use instead the analogous circular model.

preprint2012arXiv

Quantum Expanders and Geometry of Operator Spaces II

In this appendix to our paper with the same title posted on arxiv we give a quick proof of an inequality that can be substituted to Hastings's result, quoted as Lemma 1.9 in our previous paper. Our inequality is less sharp but also appears to apply with more general (and even matricial) coefficients. It shows that up to a universal constant all moments of the norm of a linear combination of the form S=∑jajUj⊗Uˉj(1−P)S=\sum\nolimits_j a_j U_j \otimes \bar U_j (1-P) are dominated by those of the corresponding Gaussian sum S′=∑jajYj⊗Yˉj′.S'=\sum\nolimits_j a_j Y_j \otimes \bar Y'_j . The advantage is that S′S' is now simply separately a Gaussian random variable with respect to the independent Gaussian random matrices (Yj)(Y_j) and (Yj′)(Y'_j), and hence is much easier to majorize. Note we plan to incorporate this appendix into our future publication.

preprint2012arXiv

Tripartite Bell inequality, random matrices and trilinear forms

In this seminar report, we present in detail the proof of a recent result due to J. Briët and T. Vidick, improving an estimate in a 2008 paper by D. Pérez-Garc\'ıa, M. Wolf, C. Palazuelos, I. Villanueva, and M. Junge, estimating the growth of the deviation in the tripartite Bell inequality. The proof requires a delicate estimate of the norms of certain trilinear (or dd-linear) forms on Hilbert space with coefficients in the second Gaussian Wiener chaos. Let E∨nE^n_{\vee} (resp. Emin⁡nE^n_{\min}) denote ℓ1n⊗ℓ1n⊗ℓ1n \ell_1^n \otimes \ell_1^n\otimes \ell_1^n equipped with the injective (resp. minimal) tensor norm. Here ℓ1n \ell_1^n is equipped with its maximal operator space structure. The Briët-Vidick method yields that the identity map InI_n satisfies (for some c>0c>0) ∥In: E∨n→Emin⁡n∥≥cn1/4(log⁡n)−3/2.\|I_n:\ E^n_{\vee}\to E^n_{\min}\|\ge c n^{1/4} (\log n)^{-3/2}. Let S2nS^n_2 denote the (Hilbert) space of n×nn\times n-matrices equipped with the Hilbert-Schmidt norm. While a lower bound closer to n1/2n^{1/2} is still open, their method produces an interesting, asymptotically almost sharp, related estimate for the map Jn: S2n⊗∨S2n⊗∨S2n→ℓ2n3⊗∨ℓ2n3J_n:\ S^n_2\stackrel{\vee}{\otimes} S^n_2\stackrel{\vee}{\otimes}S^n_2 \to \ell_2^{n^3} \stackrel{\vee}{\otimes} \ell_2^{n^3} taking ei,j⊗ek,l⊗em,ne_{i,j}\otimes e_{k,l}\otimes e_{m,n} to e[i,k,m],[j,l,n]e_{[i,k,m],[j,l,n]}.

preprint2011arXiv

Grothendieck's Theorem, past and present

Probably the most famous of Grothendieck's contributions to Banach space theory is the result that he himself described as "the fundamental theorem in the metric theory of tensor products". That is now commonly referred to as "Grothendieck's theorem" (GT in short), or sometimes as "Grothendieck's inequality". This had a major impact first in Banach space theory (roughly after 1968), then, later on, in C∗C^*-algebra theory, (roughly after 1978). More recently, in this millennium, a new version of GT has been successfully developed in the framework of "operator spaces" or non-commutative Banach spaces. In addition, GT independently surfaced in several quite unrelated fields:\ in connection with Bell's inequality in quantum mechanics, in graph theory where the Grothendieck constant of a graph has been introduced and in computer science where the Grothendieck inequality is invoked to replace certain NP hard problems by others that can be treated by "semidefinite programming" and hence solved in polynomial time. In this expository paper, we present a review of all these topics, starting from the original GT. We concentrate on the more recent developments and merely outline those of the first Banach space period since detailed accounts of that are already available, for instance the author's 1986 CBMS notes.

preprint2011arXiv

On the Dixmier problem (Seminar report after Monod-Ozawa, JFA 2010)

This seminar report contains a detailed account of the proof of the main results in Monod and Ozawa's recent JFA paper on the Dixmier unitarizability problem. The proof is exactly identical to their proof, but our more pedestrian presentation is hopefully more accessible to nonexperts. This text is not intended for publication (but it might end up as part of an updated version of our Springer Lecture Notes 1618).

preprint2011arXiv

Random Series of Trace Class Operators

In this lecture, we present some results on Gaussian (or Rademacher) random series of trace class operators, mainly due jointly with F. Lust-Piquard. We will emphasize the probabilistic reformulation of these results, as well as the open problems suggested by them. We start by a brief survey of what is known about the problem of characterizing a.s. convergent (Gaussian or Rademacher) series of random vectors in a Banach space. The main result presented here is that for certain pairs of Banach spaces E,FE,F that include Hilbert spaces (and type 2 spaces with the analytic UMD property), we have R(E⊗^F)=R(E)⊗^F+E⊗^R(F) R(E\hat\otimes F) =R(E)\hat\otimes F + E\hat\otimes R(F) where R(E)R(E) denotes the space of convergent Rademacher series with coefficients in EE and E⊗^FE\hat\otimes F denotes the projective tensor product.

preprint2011arXiv

Real interpolation and transposition of certain function spaces

Our starting point is a lemma due to Varopoulos. We give a different proof of a generalized form this lemma, that yields an equivalent description of the KK-functional for the interpolation couple (X0,X1)(X_0,X_1) where X0=Lp0,∞(μ1;Lq(μ2))X_0=L_{p_0,\infty}(μ_1; L_q(μ_2)) and X1=Lp1,∞(μ2;Lq(μ1))X_1=L_{p_1,\infty}(μ_2; L_q(μ_1)) where 0<q<p0,p1≤∞0<q<p_0,p_1\le \infty and (Ω1,μ1),(Ω2,μ2)(Ω_1,μ_1), (Ω_2,μ_2) are arbitrary measure spaces. When q=1q=1, this implies that the space (X0,X1)θ,∞(X_0,X_1)_{θ,\infty} (0<θ<10<θ<1) can be identified with a certain space of operators. We also give an extension of the Varopoulos Lemma to pairs (or finite families) of conditional expectations that seems of independent interest. The present paper is motivated by non-commutative applications that we choose to publish separately.

preprint2011arXiv

Real interpolation between row and column spaces

We give an equivalent expression for the KK-functional associated to the pair of operator spaces (R,C)(R,C) formed by the rows and columns respectively. This yields a description of the real interpolation spaces for the pair (Mn(R),Mn(C))(M_n(R), M_n(C)) (uniformly over nn). More generally, the same result is valid when MnM_n (or B(ℓ2)B(\ell_2)) is replaced by any semi-finite von Neumann algebra. We prove a version of the non-commutative Khintchine inequalities (originally due to Lust--Piquard) that is valid for the Lorentz spaces Lp,q(τ)L_{p,q}(τ) associated to a non-commutative measure ττ, simultaneously for the whole range 1≤p,q<∞1\le p,q< \infty, regardless whether p<2p<2 or p>2p>2. Actually, the main novelty is the case p=2,q≠2p=2,q\not=2. We also prove a certain simultaneous decomposition property for the operator norm and the Hilbert-Schmidt one.

preprint2008arXiv

Complex Interpolation between Hilbert, Banach and Operator spaces

Motivated by a question of Vincent Lafforgue, we study the Banach spaces XX satisfying the following property: there is a function $\vp\to Δ_X(\vp)$ tending to zero with $\vp>0$ such that every operator T ⁣:L2→L2T\colon L_2\to L_2 with $\|T\|\le \vp$ that is simultaneously contractive (i.e. of norm ≤1\le 1) on L1L_1 and on L∞L_\infty must be of norm $\le Δ_X(\vp)$ on L2(X)L_2(X). We show that $Δ_X(\vp)\in O(\vp^α)$ for some α>0α>0 iff XX is isomorphic to a quotient of a subspace of an ultraproduct of θθ-Hilbertian spaces for some θ>0 θ>0 (see Corollary \ref{comcor4.3}), where θθ-Hilbertian is meant in a slightly more general sense than in our previous paper \cite{P1}. Let Br(L2(μ))B_{r}(L_2(μ)) be the space of all regular operators on L2(μ)L_2(μ). We are able to describe the complex interpolation space (Br(L2(μ),B(L2(μ))θ. (B_{r}(L_2(μ), B(L_2(μ))^θ. We show that T ⁣:L2(μ)→L2(μ)T\colon L_2(μ)\to L_2(μ) belongs to this space iff T⊗idXT\otimes id_X is bounded on L2(X)L_2(X) for any θθ-Hilbertian space XX. More generally, we are able to describe the spaces (B(ℓp0),B(ℓp1))θor(B(Lp0),B(Lp1))θ (B(\ell_{p_0}), B(\ell_{p_1}))^θ{\rm or} (B(L_{p_0}), B(L_{p_1}))^θ for any pair 1≤p0,p1≤∞1\le p_0,p_1\le \infty and 0<θ<10<θ<1. In the same vein, given a locally compact Abelian group GG, let M(G)M(G) (resp. PM(G)PM(G)) be the space of complex measures (resp. pseudo-measures) on GG equipped with the usual norm ∥μ∥M(G)=∣μ∣(G)\|μ\|_{M(G)} = |μ|(G) (resp. ∥μ∥PM(G)=sup⁡{∣μ^(γ)∣∣γ∈G^}). \|μ\|_{PM(G)} = \sup\{|\hatμ(γ)| \big| γ\in\hat G\}). We describe similarly the interpolation space (M(G),PM(G))θ(M(G), PM(G))^θ. Various extensions and variants of this result will be given, e.g. to Schur multipliers on B(ℓ2)B(\ell_2) and to operator spaces.

preprint2008arXiv

Remarks on the non-commutative Khintchine inequalities for 0<p<20<p<2

We show that the validity of the non-commutative Khintchine inequality for some qq with 1<q<21<q<2 implies its validity (with another constant) for all 1≤p<q1\le p<q. We prove this for the inequality involving the Rademacher functions, but also for more general "lacunary" sequences, or even non-commutative analogues of the Rademacher functions. For instance, we may apply it to the "Z(2)-sequences" previously considered by Harcharras. The result appears to be new in that case. It implies that the space ℓ1n\ell^n_1 contains (as an operator space) a large subspace uniformly isomorphic (as an operator space) to Rk+CkR_k+C_k with k∼n12k\sim n^{\frac12}. This naturally raises several interesting questions concerning the best possible such kk. Unfortunately we cannot settle the validity of the non-commutative Khintchine inequality for 0<p<10<p<1 but we can prove several would be corollaries. For instance, given an infinite scalar matrix [xij][x_{ij}], we give a necessary and sufficient condition for [±xij][\pm x_{ij}] to be in the Schatten class SpS_p for almost all (independent) choices of signs ±1\pm 1. We also characterize the bounded Schur multipliers from S2S_2 to SpS_p. The latter two characterizations extend to 0<p<10<p<1 results already known for 1≤p≤21\le p\le2. In addition, we observe that the hypercontractive inequalities, proved by Carlen and Lieb for the Fermionic case, remain valid for operator space valued functions, and hence the Kahane inequalities are valid in this setting.

preprint2007arXiv

A Remark on Hypercontractive Semigroups and Operator Ideals

In this note, we answer a question raised by Johnson and Schechtman \cite{JS}, about the hypercontractive semigroup on $\{-1,1\}^{\NN}$. More generally, we prove the folllowing theorem. Let 1<p<21<p<2. Let (T(t))t>0(T(t))_{t>0} be a holomorphic semigroup on LpL_p (relative to a probability space). Assume the following mild form of hypercontractivity: for some large enough number s>0s>0, T(s)T(s) is bounded from LpL_p to L2L_2. Then for any t>0t>0, T(t)T(t) is in the norm closure in B(Lp)B(L_p) (denoted by Γ2ˉ\bar{Γ_2}) of the subset (denoted by Γ2{Γ_2}) formed by the operators mapping LpL_p to L2L_2 (a fortiori these operators factor through a Hilbert space).

preprint2005arXiv

Simultaneous similarity, bounded generation and amenability

We prove that a discrete group GG is amenable iff it is strongly unitarizable in the following sense: every unitarizable representation ππ on GG can be unitarized by an invertible chosen in the von Neumann algebra generated by the range of ππ. Analogously a C∗C^*-algebra AA is nuclear iff any bounded homomorphism u:A→B(H)u: A\to B(H) is strongly similar to a ∗*-homomorphism in the sense that there is an invertible operator ξξ in the von Neumann algebra generated by the range of uu such that a→ξu(a)ξ−1a\to ξu(a) ξ^{-1} is a ∗*-homomorphism. An analogous characterization holds in terms of derivations. We apply this to answer several questions left open in our previous work concerning the length ℓ(A,B)\ell(A,B) of the maximal tensor product A⊗max⁡BA\otimes_{\max} B of two unital C∗C^*-algebras, when we consider its generation by the subalgebras A⊗1A\otimes 1 and 1⊗B1\otimes B. We show that if ℓ(A,B)<∞\ell(A,B)<\infty either for B=B(ℓ2)B=B(\ell_2) or when BB is the C∗C^*-algebra (either full or reduced) of a non Abelian free group, then AA must be nuclear. We also show that ℓ(A,B)≤d\ell(A,B)\le d iff the canonical quotient map from the unital free product A∗BA\ast B onto A⊗max⁡BA\otimes_{\max} B remains a complete quotient map when restricted to the closed span of the words of length ≤d\le d.

preprint2002arXiv

Grothendieck's Theorem for Operator Spaces

We prove several versions of Grothendieck's Theorem for completely bounded linear maps T ⁣:E→F∗T\colon E \to F^*, when E and F are operator spaces. We prove that if E,F are C∗C^*-algebras, of which at least one is exact, then every completely bounded T ⁣:E→F∗T\colon E \to F^* can be factorized through the direct sum of the row and column Hilbert operator spaces. Equivalently T can be decomposed as T=Tr+TcT=T_r+T_c where TrT_r (resp. TcT_c) factors completely boundedly through a row (resp. column) Hilbert operator space. This settles positively (at least partially) some earlier conjectures of Effros-Ruan and Blecher on the factorization of completely bounded bilinear forms on C∗C^*-algebras. Moreover, our result holds more generally for any pair E,F of "exact" operator spaces. This yields a characterization of the completely bounded maps from a C∗C^*-algebra (or from an exact operator space) to the operator Hilbert space OH. As a corollary we prove that, up to a complete isomorphism, the row and column Hilbert operator spaces and their direct sums are the only operator spaces E such that both E and its dual E∗E^* are exact. We also characterize the Schur multipliers which are completely bounded from the space of compact operators to the trace class.

preprint1997arXiv

The ``maximal" tensor product of operator spaces

In analogy with the maximal tensor product of C∗C^*-algebras, we define the ``maximal" tensor product E1⊗μE2E_1\otimes_μE_2 of two operator spaces E1E_1 and E2E_2 and we show that it can be identified completely isometrically with the sum of the two Haagerup tensor products: \ E1⊗hE2+E2⊗hE1E_1\otimes_h E_2 + E_2\otimes_h E_1. Let EE be an nn-dimensional operator space. As an application, we show that the equality E∗⊗μE=E∗⊗minEE^* \otimes_μE=E^* \otimes_{\rm min} E holds isometrically iff E=RnE = R_n or E=CnE=C_n (the row or column nn-dimensional Hilbert spaces). Moreover, we show that if an operator space EE is such that, for any operator space FF, we have F⊗min⁡E=F⊗μEF\otimes_{\min} E=F\otimes_μ E isomorphically, then EE is completely isomorphic to either a row or a column Hilbert space.

preprint1997arXiv

The similarity degree of an operator algebra

Let AA be a unital operator algebra. Let us assume that every {\it bounded\/} unital homomorphism u ⁣: A→B(H)u\colon \ A\to B(H) is similar to a {\it contractive\/} one. Let Sim(u)=inf⁡{∥S∥ ∥S−1∥}\text{\rm Sim}(u) = \inf\{\|S\|\, \|S^{-1}\|\} where the infimum runs over all invertible operators S ⁣: H→HS\colon \ H\to H such that the ``conjugate'' homomorphism a→S−1u(a)Sa\to S^{-1}u(a)S is contractive. Now for all c>1c>1, let Φ(c)=sup⁡Sim(u)Φ(c) = \sup\text{\rm Sim}(u) where the supremum runs over all unital homomorphism u ⁣: A→B(H)u\colon\ A\to B(H) with ∥u∥≤c\|u\|\le c. Then, there is α≥0α\ge 0 such that for some constant KK we have: $$Φ(c) \le Kc^α.\leqno (*)\qquad \forall c>1$$ Moreover, the smallest αα for which this holds is an integer, denoted by d(A)d(A) (called the similarity degree of AA) and (∗)(*) still holds for some KK when α=d(A)α=d(A). Among the applications of these results, we give new characterizations of proper uniform algebras on one hand, and of nuclear C∗C^*-algebras on the other. Moreover, we obtain a characterization of amenable groups which answers (at least partially) a question on group representations going back to a 1950 paper of Dixmier.

preprint1996arXiv

A polynomially bounded operator on Hilbert space which is not similar to a contraction

Let $\eps >0$. We prove that there exists an operator $T_\eps:\ell_2\to\ell_2$, such that for any polynomial PP we have $\|{P(T)}\| \leq(1+\eps)\|{P}\|_\infty$, but which is not similar to a contraction, {\it i.e.} there does not exist an invertible operator S: ℓ2→ℓ2S:\ \ell_2\to\ell_2 such that $\|{S^{-1}T_\eps S}\|\leq 1$. This answers negatively a question attributed to Halmos after his well known 1970 paper (``Ten problems in Hilbert space").

preprint1995arXiv

A simple proof of a theorem of Kirchberg and related results on C∗C^*-norms

Recently, E.\ Kirchberg [K1--2] revived the study of pairs of C∗C^*-algebras A,BA,B such that there is only one C∗C^*-norm on the algebraic tensor product A⊗BA\otimes B, or equivalently such that A⊗minB=A⊗maxBA \otimes_{\rm min}B = A\otimes_{\rm max}B. Recall that a C∗C^*-algebra is called nuclear cf.\ [L, EL] if this happens for any C∗C^*-algebra BB. Kirchberg [K1] constructed the first example of a non-nuclear C∗C^*-algebra such that A⊗minAop=A⊗maxAopA\otimes_{\rm min} A^{op} = A \otimes_{\rm max} A^{op}. He also proved the following striking result [K2] for which we give a very simple proof and which we extend. \proclaim Theorem 0.1. {\bf (Kirchberg [K2]).} Let FF be any free group and let C∗(F)C^*(F) be the (full) C∗C^*-algebra of FF, then C∗(F)⊗minB(H)=C∗(F)⊗maxB(H).C^*(F) \otimes_{\rm min} B(H) = C^*(F) \otimes_{\rm max} B(H).

preprint1993arXiv

Bilinear forms on exact operator spaces and B(H)\otimes B(H)

Let E,FE,F be exact operators (For example subspaces of the C∗C^*-algebra K(H)K(H) of all the compact operators on an infinite dimensional Hilbert space HH). We study a class of bounded linear maps u ⁣:E→F∗u\colon E\to F^* which we call tracially bounded. In particular, we prove that every completely bounded (in short c.b.c.b.) map u ⁣:E→F∗u\colon E\to F^* factors boundedly through a Hilbert space. This is used to show that the set OSnOS_n of all nn-dimensional operator spaces equipped with the c.b.c.b. version of the Banach Mazur distance is not separable if n>2n>2. As an application we show that there is more than one C∗C^*-norm on B(H)⊗B(H)B(H)\otimes B(H), or equivalently that B(H)⊗min⁡B(H)≠B(H)⊗max⁡B(H),B(H)\otimes_{\min}B(H)\not=B(H)\otimes_{\max}B(H), which answers a long standing open question. Finally we show that every ``maximal" operator space (in the sense of Paulsen) is not exact in the infinite dimensional case, and in the finite dimensional case, we give a lower bound for the ``exactness constant".

preprint1993arXiv

Bounded linear operators between C^*-algebras

Let u:A→Bu:A\to B be a bounded linear operator between two C∗C^*-algebras A,BA,B. The following result was proved by the second author. Theorem 0.1. There is a numerical constant K1K_1 such that for all finite sequences x1,…,xnx_1,\ldots, x_n in AA we have $$\leqalignno{&\max\left\{\left\|\left(\sum u(x_i)^* u(x_i)\right)^{1/2}\right\|_B, \left\|\left(\sum u(x_i) u(x_i)^*\right)^{1/2}\right\|_B\right\}&(0.1)_1\cr \le &K_1\|u\| \max\left\{\left\|\left(\sum x^*_ix_i\right)^{1/2}\right\|_A, \left\|\left(\sum x_ix^*_i\right)^{1/2}\right\|_A\right\}.}$$ A simpler proof was given in [H1]. More recently an other alternate proof appeared in [LPP]. In this paper we give a sequence of generalizations of this inequality.

preprint1993arXiv

Complex Interpolation and Regular Operators Between Banach

We study certain interpolation and extension properties of the space of regular operators between two Banach lattices. Let RpR_p be the space of all the regular (or equivalently order bounded) operators on LpL_p equipped with the regular norm. We prove the isometric identity Rp=(R∞,R1)θR_p = (R_\infty,R_1)^θ if θ=1/pθ= 1/p, which shows that the spaces (Rp)(R_p) form an interpolation scale relative to Calderón's interpolation method. We also prove that if S⊂LpS\subset L_p is a subspace, every regular operator u:S→Lpu : S \to L_p admits a regular extension u~:Lp→Lp\tilde u : L_p \to L_p with the same regular norm. This extends a result due to Mireille Lévy in the case p=1p = 1. Finally, we apply these ideas to the Hardy space HpH^p viewed as a subspace of LpL_p on the circle. We show that the space of regular operators from HpH^p to LpL_p possesses a similar interpolation property as the spaces RpR_p defined above.

preprint1993arXiv

Exact operator spaces

In this paper, we study {\it operator spaces\/} in the sense of the theory developed recently by Blecher-Paulsen [BP] and Effros-Ruan [ER1]. By an operator space, we mean a closed subspace E⊂B(H)E\subset B(H), with HH Hilbert. We will be mainly concerned here with the ``geometry'' of {\it finite dimensional\/} operator spaces. In the Banach space category, it is well known that every separable space embeds isometrically into ℓ∞\ell_\infty. Moreover, if EE is a finite dimensional normed space then for each $\vp>0$, there is an integer nn and a subspace F⊂ℓ∞nF\subset \ell^n_\infty which is $(1+\vp)$-isomorphic to EE, i.e. there is an isomorphism u ⁣: E→Fu\colon \ E\to F such that $\|u\|\ \|u^{-1}\|\le 1+\vp$. Here of course, nn depends on $\vp$, say $n=n(\vp)$ and usually (for instance if E=ℓ2kE = \ell^k_2) we have $n(\vp)\to \infty$ when $\vp\to 0$. Quite interestingly, it turns out that this fact is not valid in the category of operator spaces:\ although every operator space embeds completely isometrically into B(H)B(H) (the non-commutative analogue of ℓ∞\ell_\infty) it is not true that a finite dimensional operator space must be close to a subspace of MnM_n (the non-commutative analogue of ℓ∞n\ell^n_\infty) for some nn. The main object of this paper is to study this phenomenon.

preprint1993arXiv

Noncommutative vector valued LpL_p-spaces and completely pp-summing maps

Let EE be an operator space in the sense of the theory recently developed by Blecher-Paulsen and Effros-Ruan. We introduce a notion of EE-valued non commutative LpL_p-space for 1≤p<∞1 \leq p < \infty and we prove that the resulting operator space satisfies the natural properties to be expected with respect to e.g. duality and interpolation. This notion leads to the definition of a ``completely p-summing" map which is the operator space analogue of the pp-absolutely summing maps in the sense of Pietsch-Kwapień. These notions extend the particular case p=1p=1 which was previously studied by Effros-Ruan.

preprint1993arXiv

Regular operators between non-commutative LpL_p-spaces

We introduce the notion of a regular mapping on a non-commutative LpL_p-space associated to a hyperfinite von Neumann algebra for 1≤p≤∞1\le p\le \infty. This is a non-commutative generalization of the notion of regular or order bounded map on a Banach lattice. This extension is based on our recent paper [P3], where we introduce and study a non-commutative version of vector valued LpL_p-spaces. In the extreme cases p=1p=1 and p=∞p=\infty, our regular operators reduce to the completely bounded ones and the regular norm coincides with the cbcb-norm. We prove that a mapping is regular iff it is a linear combination of bounded, completely positive mappings. We prove an extension theorem for regular mappings defined on a subspace of a non-commutative LpL_p-space. Finally, let RpR_p be the space of all regular mappings on a given non-commutative LpL_p-space equipped with the regular norm. We prove the isometric identity Rp=(R∞,R1)θR_p=(R_\infty,R_1)^θ where θ=1/pθ=1/p and where ( . , . )θ(\ .\ ,\ .\ )^θ is the dual variant of Calderón's complex interpolation method.

preprint1993arXiv

The k_t--functional for the interpolation couple L^\infty(dμ;L^1(dν)), L^\infty(dν;L^1(dμ))

Let (M,μ)(M,μ) and (N,ν)(N,ν) be measure spaces. In this paper, we study the KtK_t--\,functional for the couple A0=L∞(dμ ;L1(dν)) ,  A1=L∞(dν ;L1(dμ)) .A_0=L^\infty(dμ\,; L^1(dν))\,,~~A_1=L^\infty(dν\,; L^1(dμ))\,. Here, and in what follows the vector valued LpL^p--\,spaces Lp(dμ ;Lq(dν))L^p(dμ\,; L^q(dν)) are meant in Bochner's sense. One of our main results is the following, which can be viewed as a refinement of a lemma due to Varopoulos [V]. \proclaim Theorem 0.1. Let (A0,A1)(A_0,A_1) be as above. Then for all ff in A0+A1A_0+A_1 we have 12 Kt(f; A0 ,A1)≤sup⁡ {(μ(E)∨t−1ν(F))−1∫E×F∣f∣ dμ dν }≤Kt(f; A0 ,A1) ,{1\over 2}\,K_t(f;\,A_0\,,A_1)\leq \sup\,\bigg\{ \Big(μ(E)\vee t^{-1}ν(F)\Big)^{-1} \int_{E\times F} \vert f\vert\,dμ\,dν\,\bigg\} \leq K_t(f;\,A_0\,,A_1)\,, where the supremum runs over all measurable subsets E⊂M , F⊂NE\subset M\,,~ F\subset N with positive and finite measure and u ⁣∨ ⁣vu\!\vee\!v denotes the maximum of the reals uu and vv.

preprint1992arXiv

Espace de Hilbert d'opérateurs et Interpolation complexe

Let HH be an infinite dimensional Hilbert space. We show that there exists a subspace of B(H)B(H) which is isometric to ℓ2\ell_2 and completely isometric to its antidual in the sense of the theory of operator spaces recently developed by Blecher-Paulsen and Effros-Ruan. Moreover this space is unique up to a complete isometry. We denote it by OHOH. This space has several remarkable properties in particular with respect to the complex interpolation method.

preprint1992arXiv

Interpolation Between HpH^p Spaces and Non-Commutative Generalizations II

We continue an investigation started in a preceding paper. We discuss the classical results of Carleson connecting Carleson measures with the $\d$-equation in a slightly more abstract framework than usual. We also consider a more recent result of Peter Jones which shows the existence of a solution of the $\d$-equation, which satisfies simultaneously a good LıL_ı estimate and a good L1L_1 estimate. This appears as a special case of our main result which can be stated as follows: Let (Ω,A,μ)(Ω,\cal{A},μ) be any measure space. Consider a bounded operator $u:H^1\ra L_1(μ)$. Assume that on one hand uu admits an extension $u_1:L^1\ra L_1(μ)$ bounded with norm C1C_1, and on the other hand that uu admits an extension $u_ı:L^ı\ra L_ı(μ)$ bounded with norm CıC_ı. Then uu admits an extension $\w{u}$ which is bounded simultaneously from L1L^1 into L1(μ) L_1(μ) and from LıL^ı into Lı(μ) L_ı(μ) and satisfies $$\eqalign{&\|\tilde u\colon \ L_\infty \to L_\infty(μ)\|\le CC_\infty\cr &\|\tilde u\colon \ L_1\to L_1(μ)\|\le CC_1}$$ where CC is a numerical constant.

preprint1992arXiv

Multipliers and lacunary sets in non-amenable groups

Let GG be a discrete group. Let λ:G→B(ℓ2(G),ℓ2(G))λ: G \to B(\ell_2(G),\ell_2(G)) be the left regular representation. A function $\ph : G \to \comp$ is called a completely bounded multiplier (= Herz-Schur multiplier) if the transformation defined on the linear span K(G)K(G) of {λ(x),x∈G}\{λ(x),x \in G\} by $$\sum_{x \in G} f(x) λ(x) \to \sum_{x \in G} f(x) \ph(x) λ(x)$$ is completely bounded (in short c.b.) on the C∗C^*-algebra Cλ∗(G)C_λ^*(G) which is generated by λλ (Cλ∗(G)C_λ^*(G) is the closure of K(G)K(G) in B(ℓ2(G),ℓ2(G))B(\ell_2(G),\ell_2(G)).) One of our main results gives a simple characterization of the functions $\ph$ such that $\eps \ph$ is a c.b. multiplier on Cλ∗(G)C_λ^*(G) for any bounded function $\eps$, or equivalently for any choice of signs $\eps(x) = \pm 1$. We also consider the case when this holds for ``almost all" choices of signs.

preprint1992arXiv

Sur les opérateurs factorisables par OHOH

Let H,KH,K be Hilbert spaces. Let E⊂B(H)E \subset B(H) and F⊂B(K)F \subset B(K) be operator spaces in the sense of [1,2]. We study the operators u:E→Fu : E \to F which admit a factorization E→OH→FE \to OH \to F with completely bounded maps through the operator Hilbert space OHOH which we have introduced and studied in a recent note. We give a characterization of these operators which allows to develop a theory entirely analogous to that of operators between Banach spaces which can be factored through a Hilbert space.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.