BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research pathsDiscover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
G. Cortiñas appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
In this companion paper to arXiv:0802.1928 we provide an example of an isolated surface singularity $R$ over a number field such that $K_0(R) = K_0(R[t])$ but $K_0(R) \neq K_0(R[t_1,t_2])$. This answers, negatively, a question of Bass.
The $K$-theory of a polynomial ring $R[t]$ contains the $K$-theory of $R$ as a summand. For $R$ commutative and containing $\Q$, we describe $K_*(R[t])/K_*(R)$ in terms of Hochschild homology and the cohomology of Kähler differentials for the $cdh$ topology. We use this to address Bass' question, on whether $K_n(R)=K_n(R[t])$ implies $K_n(R)=K_n(R[t_1,t_2])$. The answer is positive over fields of infinite transcendence degree; the companion paper arXiv:1004.3829 provides a counterexample over a number field.
There is a Chern character from K-theory to negative cyclic homology. We show that it preserves the decomposition coming from Adams operations, at least in characteristic 0. This is done by using infinitesimal cohomology to reduce to the case of a nilpotent ideal (which had been established by Cathelineau some time ago).
In this paper we prove that for an affine scheme essentially of finite type over a field $F$ and of dimension $d$, $K_{d+1}$-regularity implies regularity, assuming that the characteristic of $F$ is zero. This verifies a conjecture of Vorst.
We prove a blow-up formula for cyclic homology which we use to show that infinitesimal $K$-theory satisfies $cdh$-descent. Combining that result with some computations of the $cdh$-cohomology of the sheaf of regular functions, we verify a conjecture of Weibel predicting the vanishing of algebraic $K$-theory of a scheme in degrees less than minus the dimension of the scheme, for schemes essentially of finite type over a field of characteristic zero.
The (dual) Dold-Kan correspondence says that there is an equivalence of categories $K:\cha\to \Ab^Δ$ between nonnegatively graded cochain complexes and cosimplicial abelian groups, which is inverse to the normalization functor. We show that the restriction of $K$ to $DG$-rings can be equipped with an associative product and that the resulting functor $DGR^*\to\ass^Δ$, although not itself an equivalence, does induce one at the level of homotopy categories. The dual of this result for chain $DG$ and simplicial rings was obtained independently by S. Schwede and B. Shipley through different methods ({\it Equivalences of monoidal model categories}. Algebraic and Geometric Topology 3 (2003), 287-334). Our proof is based on a functor $Q:DGR^*\to \ass^Δ$, naturally homotopy equivalent to $K$, which preserves the closed model structure. It also has other interesting applications. For example, we use $Q$ to prove a noncommutative version of the Hochschild-Konstant-Rosenberg and Loday-Quillen theorems. Our version applies to the cyclic module that arises from a homomorphism $R\to S$ of not necessarily commutative rings when the coproduct $\coprod_R$ of associative $R$-algebras is substituted for $\otimes_R$. As another application of the properties of $Q$, we obtain a simple, braid-free description of a product on the tensor power $S^{\otimes_R^n}$ originally defined by P. Nuss using braids ({\it Noncommutative descent and nonabelian cohomology,} K-theory {\bf 12} (1997) 23-74.).