Schur-finiteness in $λ$-rings
We introduce the notion of a Schur-finite element in a $λ$-ring.
Researcher profile
C. Weibel
C. Weibel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Trust snapshot
Quick read
Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators
Actions
Decide how to stay connected
Identity and collaboration
How to connect with this researcher
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Open a focused conversation when the fit is right
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
See the researcher in context
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
Building this graph slice
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
3 published item(s)
preprint2010arXiv
A negative answer to a question of Bass
In this companion paper to arXiv:0802.1928 we provide an example of an isolated surface singularity $R$ over a number field such that $K_0(R) = K_0(R[t])$ but $K_0(R) \neq K_0(R[t_1,t_2])$. This answers, negatively, a question of Bass.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv
Bass' $NK$ groups and $cdh$-fibrant Hochschild homology
The $K$-theory of a polynomial ring $R[t]$ contains the $K$-theory of $R$ as a summand. For $R$ commutative and containing $\Q$, we describe $K_*(R[t])/K_*(R)$ in terms of Hochschild homology and the cohomology of Kähler differentials for the $cdh$ topology. We use this to address Bass' question, on whether $K_n(R)=K_n(R[t])$ implies $K_n(R)=K_n(R[t_1,t_2])$. The answer is positive over fields of infinite transcendence degree; the companion paper arXiv:1004.3829 provides a counterexample over a number field.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access