Paper detail

Cosimplicial versus DG-rings: a version of the Dold-Kan correspondence

The (dual) Dold-Kan correspondence says that there is an equivalence of categories $K:\cha\to \Ab^Δ$ between nonnegatively graded cochain complexes and cosimplicial abelian groups, which is inverse to the normalization functor. We show that the restriction of $K$ to $DG$-rings can be equipped with an associative product and that the resulting functor $DGR^*\to\ass^Δ$, although not itself an equivalence, does induce one at the level of homotopy categories. The dual of this result for chain $DG$ and simplicial rings was obtained independently by S. Schwede and B. Shipley through different methods ({\it Equivalences of monoidal model categories}. Algebraic and Geometric Topology 3 (2003), 287-334). Our proof is based on a functor $Q:DGR^*\to \ass^Δ$, naturally homotopy equivalent to $K$, which preserves the closed model structure. It also has other interesting applications. For example, we use $Q$ to prove a noncommutative version of the Hochschild-Konstant-Rosenberg and Loday-Quillen theorems. Our version applies to the cyclic module that arises from a homomorphism $R\to S$ of not necessarily commutative rings when the coproduct $\coprod_R$ of associative $R$-algebras is substituted for $\otimes_R$. As another application of the properties of $Q$, we obtain a simple, braid-free description of a product on the tensor power $S^{\otimes_R^n}$ originally defined by P. Nuss using braids ({\it Noncommutative descent and nonabelian cohomology,} K-theory {\bf 12} (1997) 23-74.).

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.