Researcher profile

Francesca Medda

Francesca Medda contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Latent Variable Phillips Curve

This paper re-examines the empirical Phillips curve (PC) model and its usefulness in the context of medium-term inflation forecasting. A latent variable Phillips curve hypothesis is formulated and tested using 3,968 randomly generated factor combinations. Evidence from US core PCE inflation between Q1 1983 and Q1 2025 suggests that latent variable PC models reliably outperform traditional PC models six to eight quarters ahead and stand a greater chance of outperforming a univariate benchmark. Incorporating an MA(1) residual process improves the accuracy of empirical PC models across the board, although the gains relative to univariate models remain small. The findings presented in this paper have two important implications: First, they corroborate a new conceptual view on the Phillips curve theory; second, they offer a novel path towards improving the competitiveness of Phillips curve forecasts in future empirical work.

preprint2022arXiv

How Covid mobility restrictions modified the population of investors in Italian stock markets

This paper investigates how Covid mobility restrictions impacted the population of investors of the Italian stock market. The analysis tracks the trading activity of individual investors in Italian stocks in the period January 2019-September 2021, investigating how their composition and the trading activity changed around the Covid-19 lockdown period (March 9 - May 19, 2020) and more generally in the period of the pandemic. The results pinpoint that the lockdown restriction was accompanied by a surge in interest toward stock market, as testified by the trading volume by households. Given the generically falling prices during the lockdown, the households, which are typically contrarian, were net buyers, even if less than expected from their trading activity in 2019. This can be explained by the arrival, during the lockdown, of a group of about 185k new investors (i.e. which had never traded since January 2019) which were on average ten year younger and with a larger fraction of males than the pre-lockdown investors. By looking at the gross P&L, there is clear evidence that these new investors were more skilled in trading. There are thus indications that the lockdown, and more generally the Covid pandemic, created a sort of regime change in the population of financial investors.

preprint2021arXiv

A Baseline for Shapley Values in MLPs: from Missingness to Neutrality

Deep neural networks have gained momentum based on their accuracy, but their interpretability is often criticised. As a result, they are labelled as black boxes. In response, several methods have been proposed in the literature to explain their predictions. Among the explanatory methods, Shapley values is a feature attribution method favoured for its robust theoretical foundation. However, the analysis of feature attributions using Shapley values requires choosing a baseline that represents the concept of missingness. An arbitrary choice of baseline could negatively impact the explanatory power of the method and possibly lead to incorrect interpretations. In this paper, we present a method for choosing a baseline according to a neutrality value: as a parameter selected by decision-makers, the point at which their choices are determined by the model predictions being either above or below it. Hence, the proposed baseline is set based on a parameter that depends on the actual use of the model. This procedure stands in contrast to how other baselines are set, i.e. without accounting for how the model is used. We empirically validate our choice of baseline in the context of binary classification tasks, using two datasets: a synthetic dataset and a dataset derived from the financial domain.