BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Eren Manavoglu

Eren Manavoglu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningComputer Visionmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Representation Learning for Clustering via Building Consensus

In this paper, we focus on unsupervised representation learning for clustering of images. Recent advances in deep clustering and unsupervised representation learning are based on the idea that different views of an input image (generated through data augmentation techniques) must be close in the representation space (exemplar consistency), and/or similar images must have similar cluster assignments (population consistency). We define an additional notion of consistency, consensus consistency, which ensures that representations are learned to induce similar partitions for variations in the representation space, different clustering algorithms or different initializations of a single clustering algorithm. We define a clustering loss by executing variations in the representation space and seamlessly integrate all three consistencies (consensus, exemplar and population) into an end-to-end learning framework. The proposed algorithm, consensus clustering using unsupervised representation learning (ConCURL), improves upon the clustering performance of state-of-the-art methods on four out of five image datasets. Furthermore, we extend the evaluation procedure for clustering to reflect the challenges encountered in real-world clustering tasks, such as maintaining clustering performance in cases with distribution shifts. We also perform a detailed ablation study for a deeper understanding of the proposed algorithm. The code and the trained models are available at https://github.com/JayanthRR/ConCURL_NCE.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Data Transformation Insights in Self-supervision with Clustering Tasks

Self-supervision is key to extending use of deep learning for label scarce domains. For most of self-supervised approaches data transformations play an important role. However, up until now the impact of transformations have not been studied. Furthermore, different transformations may have different impact on the system. We provide novel insights into the use of data transformation in self-supervised tasks, specially pertaining to clustering. We show theoretically and empirically that certain set of transformations are helpful in convergence of self-supervised clustering. We also show the cases when the transformations are not helpful or in some cases even harmful. We show faster convergence rate with valid transformations for convex as well as certain family of non-convex objectives along with the proof of convergence to the original set of optima. We have synthetic as well as real world data experiments. Empirically our results conform with the theoretical insights provided.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Self-Supervised Contextual Bandits in Computer Vision

Contextual bandits are a common problem faced by machine learning practitioners in domains as diverse as hypothesis testing to product recommendations. There have been a lot of approaches in exploiting rich data representations for contextual bandit problems with varying degree of success. Self-supervised learning is a promising approach to find rich data representations without explicit labels. In a typical self-supervised learning scheme, the primary task is defined by the problem objective (e.g. clustering, classification, embedding generation etc.) and the secondary task is defined by the self-supervision objective (e.g. rotation prediction, words in neighborhood, colorization, etc.). In the usual self-supervision, we learn implicit labels from the training data for a secondary task. However, in the contextual bandit setting, we don't have the advantage of getting implicit labels due to lack of data in the initial phase of learning. We provide a novel approach to tackle this issue by combining a contextual bandit objective with a self supervision objective. By augmenting contextual bandit learning with self-supervision we get a better cumulative reward. Our results on eight popular computer vision datasets show substantial gains in cumulative reward. We provide cases where the proposed scheme doesn't perform optimally and give alternative methods for better learning in these cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access