BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Denis Charles

Denis Charles contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningArtificial IntelligenceComputer VisionInformation Retrievalmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

TEDL: A Two-stage Evidential Deep Learning Method for Classification Uncertainty Quantification

In this paper, we propose TEDL, a two-stage learning approach to quantify uncertainty for deep learning models in classification tasks, inspired by our findings in experimenting with Evidential Deep Learning (EDL) method, a recently proposed uncertainty quantification approach based on the Dempster-Shafer theory. More specifically, we observe that EDL tends to yield inferior AUC compared with models learnt by cross-entropy loss and is highly sensitive in training. Such sensitivity is likely to cause unreliable uncertainty estimation, making it risky for practical applications. To mitigate both limitations, we propose a simple yet effective two-stage learning approach based on our analysis on the likely reasons causing such sensitivity, with the first stage learning from cross-entropy loss, followed by a second stage learning from EDL loss. We also re-formulate the EDL loss by replacing ReLU with ELU to avoid the Dying ReLU issue. Extensive experiments are carried out on varied sized training corpus collected from a large-scale commercial search engine, demonstrating that the proposed two-stage learning framework can increase AUC significantly and greatly improve training robustness.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Causal Transfer Random Forest: Combining Logged Data and Randomized Experiments for Robust Prediction

It is often critical for prediction models to be robust to distributional shifts between training and testing data. From a causal perspective, the challenge is to distinguish the stable causal relationships from the unstable spurious correlations across shifts. We describe a causal transfer random forest (CTRF) that combines existing training data with a small amount of data from a randomized experiment to train a model which is robust to the feature shifts and therefore transfers to a new targeting distribution. Theoretically, we justify the robustness of the approach against feature shifts with the knowledge from causal learning. Empirically, we evaluate the CTRF using both synthetic data experiments and real-world experiments in the Bing Ads platform, including a click prediction task and in the context of an end-to-end counterfactual optimization system. The proposed CTRF produces robust predictions and outperforms most baseline methods compared in the presence of feature shifts.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Causal Inference in the Presence of Interference in Sponsored Search Advertising

In classical causal inference, inferring cause-effect relations from data relies on the assumption that units are independent and identically distributed. This assumption is violated in settings where units are related through a network of dependencies. An example of such a setting is ad placement in sponsored search advertising, where the clickability of a particular ad is potentially influenced by where it is placed and where other ads are placed on the search result page. In such scenarios, confounding arises due to not only the individual ad-level covariates but also the placements and covariates of other ads in the system. In this paper, we leverage the language of causal inference in the presence of interference to model interactions among the ads. Quantification of such interactions allows us to better understand the click behavior of users, which in turn impacts the revenue of the host search engine and enhances user satisfaction. We illustrate the utility of our formalization through experiments carried out on the ad placement system of the Bing search engine.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Data Transformation Insights in Self-supervision with Clustering Tasks

Self-supervision is key to extending use of deep learning for label scarce domains. For most of self-supervised approaches data transformations play an important role. However, up until now the impact of transformations have not been studied. Furthermore, different transformations may have different impact on the system. We provide novel insights into the use of data transformation in self-supervised tasks, specially pertaining to clustering. We show theoretically and empirically that certain set of transformations are helpful in convergence of self-supervised clustering. We also show the cases when the transformations are not helpful or in some cases even harmful. We show faster convergence rate with valid transformations for convex as well as certain family of non-convex objectives along with the proof of convergence to the original set of optima. We have synthetic as well as real world data experiments. Empirically our results conform with the theoretical insights provided.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Self-Supervised Contextual Bandits in Computer Vision

Contextual bandits are a common problem faced by machine learning practitioners in domains as diverse as hypothesis testing to product recommendations. There have been a lot of approaches in exploiting rich data representations for contextual bandit problems with varying degree of success. Self-supervised learning is a promising approach to find rich data representations without explicit labels. In a typical self-supervised learning scheme, the primary task is defined by the problem objective (e.g. clustering, classification, embedding generation etc.) and the secondary task is defined by the self-supervision objective (e.g. rotation prediction, words in neighborhood, colorization, etc.). In the usual self-supervision, we learn implicit labels from the training data for a secondary task. However, in the contextual bandit setting, we don't have the advantage of getting implicit labels due to lack of data in the initial phase of learning. We provide a novel approach to tackle this issue by combining a contextual bandit objective with a self supervision objective. By augmenting contextual bandit learning with self-supervision we get a better cumulative reward. Our results on eight popular computer vision datasets show substantial gains in cumulative reward. We provide cases where the proposed scheme doesn't perform optimally and give alternative methods for better learning in these cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access