BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Enrico Rubiola

Enrico Rubiola contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.ins-detphysics.data-anastro-ph.IMcond-mat.mes-hallMethodologyphysics.atom-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

The Statistics of the Cross-Spectrum and the Spectrum Average: Generalization to Multiple Instruments

This article addresses the measurement of the power spectrum of red noise processes at the lowest frequencies, where the minimum acquisition time is so long that it is impossible to average on a sequence of data record. Therefore, averaging is possible only on simultaneous observation of multiple instruments. This is the case of radio astronomy, which we take as the paradigm, but examples may be found in other fields such as climatology and geodesy. We compare the Bayesian confidence interval of the red-noise parameter using two estimators, the spectrum average and the cross-spectrum. While the spectrum average is widely used, the cross-spectrum using multiple instruments is rather uncommon. With two instruments, the cross-spectrum estimator leads to the Variance-Gamma distribution. A generalization to $q$ devices is provided, with the example of the observation of millisecond pulsars with 5 radio telescopes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Applying clock comparison methods to pulsar timing observations

Frequency metrology outperforms any other branch of metrology in accuracy (parts in $10^{-16}$) and small fluctuations ($<10^{-17}$). In turn, among celestial bodies, the rotation speed of millisecond pulsars (MSP) is by far the most stable ($<10^{-18}$). Therefore, the precise measurement of the time of arrival (TOA) of pulsar signals is expected to disclose information about cosmological phenomena, and to enlarge our astrophysical knowledge. Related to this topic, Pulsar Timing Array (PTA) projects have been developed and operated for the last decades. The TOAs from a pulsar can be affected by local emission and environmental effects, in the direction of the propagation through the interstellar medium or universally by gravitational waves from super massive black hole binaries. These effects (signals) can manifest as a low-frequency fluctuation over time, phenomenologically similar to a red noise. While the remaining pulsar intrinsic and instrumental background (noise) are white. This article focuses on the frequency metrology of pulsars. From our standpoint, the pulsar is an accurate clock, to be measured simultaneously with several telescopes in order to reject the uncorrelated white noise. We apply the modern statistical methods of time-and-frequency metrology to simulated pulsar data, and we show the detection limit of the correlated red noise signal between telescopes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Response and Uncertainty of the Parabolic Variance PVAR to Non-Integer Exponents of the Power Law

Oscillator fluctuations are described as the phase or frequency noise spectrum, or in terms of a wavelet variance as a function of the measurement time. The spectrum is generally approximated by the `power law,&#39; i.e., a Laurent polynomial with integer exponents of the frequency. This article extends the domain of application of PVAR, a wavelet variance which uses the linear regression on phase data to estimate the frequency, and called `parabolic&#39; because such regression is equivalent to a parabolic-shaped weight function applied to frequency fluctuations. In turn, PVAR is relevant in that it improves on the widely-used Modified Allan variance (MVAR) enabling the detection of the same noise processes at the same confidence level in a shorter measurement time. More specifically, we provide (i) the analytical expression of the response of the PVAR to the frequency-noise spectrum in the general case of non-integer exponents of the frequency, and (ii) a useful approximate expression of the statistical uncertainty.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Artifacts and Errors in Cross-Spectrum Phase Noise Measurements

This article deals with the erratic and inconsistent phase-noise spectra often seen in low-noise oscillators, whose floor is of the order of $-180$ dBc/Hz or less. Such oscillators are generally measured with two-channel instruments based on averaging two simultaneous and statistically independent measures. Our new method consists of inserting a dissipative attenuator between the oscillator under test and the phase-noise analyzer. The thermal noise of the attenuator introduces a controlled amount of phase noise. We compare the phase noise floor to the theoretical expectation with different values of the attenuation in small steps. The analysis reveals a negative bias (underestimation of phase noise) due to the thermal energy of the internal power splitter at the instrument input, and an uncertainty due to crosstalk between the two channels. In not-so-rare unfortunate cases, the bias results in a negative phase-noise spectrum, which is an obvious nonsense. Similar results are observed separately in three labs with instruments from the two major brands. We give experimental evidence, full theory, and suggestions to mitigate the problem. Our multiple-attenuators method provides quantitative information about the correlation phenomena inside the instrument.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Cross-Spectrum Measurement Statistics

The cross-spectrum method consists in measuring a signal $c(t)$ simultaneously with two independent instruments. Each of these instruments contributes to the global noise by its intrinsec (white) noise, whereas the signal $c(t)$ that we want to characterize could be a (red) noise. We first define the real part of the cross-spectrum as a relevant estimator. Then, we characterize the probability density function (PDF) of this estimator knowing the noise level (direct problem) as a Variance-Gamma (V$Γ$) distribution. Next, we solve the &#34;inverse problem&#34; thanks to Bayes&#39; theorem to obtain an upper limit of the noise level knowing the estimate. Checked by massive Monte Carlo simulations, V$Γ$ proves to be perfectly reliable to any number of degrees of freedom (dof). Finally we compare this method with an other method using the Karhunen-Loève transfrom (KLT). We find an upper limit of the signal level slightly different as the one of V$Γ$ since KLT better takes into account the available informations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Influence of flicker noise and nonlinearity on the frequency spectrum of spin torque nano-oscillators

The correlation of phase fluctuations in any type of oscillator fundamentally defines its spectral shape. However, in nonlinear oscillators, such as spin torque nano oscillators, the frequency spectrum can become particularly complex. This is specifically true when not only considering thermal but also colored $1/f$ flicker noise processes, which are crucial in the context of the oscillator&#39;s long term stability. In this study, we address the frequency spectrum of spin torque oscillators in the regime of large-amplitude steady oscillations experimentally and as well theoretically. We particularly take both thermal and flicker noise into account. We perform a series of measurements of the phase noise and the spectrum on spin torque vortex oscillators, notably varying the measurement time duration. Furthermore, we develop the modelling of thermal and flicker noise in Thiele equation based simulations. We also derive the complete phase variance in the framework of the nonlinear auto-oscillator theory and deduce the actual frequency spectrum. We investigate its dependence on the measurement time duration and compare with the experimental results. Long term stability is important in several of the recent applicative developments of spin torque oscillators. This study brings some insights on how to better address this issue.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Phase Sensitivity and Phase Noise of Cantilever-Type Magnetoelastic Sensors Based on the $Δ$E Effect

Magnetoelastic sensors for the detection of low-frequency and low-amplitude magnetic fields are in the focus of research since more than 30 years. In order to minimize the limit of detection (LOD) of such sensor systems, it is of high importance to understand and to be able to quantify the relevant noise sources. In this contribution, cantilever-type electromechanic and magnetoelastic resonators, respectively, are comprehensively investigated and mathematically described not only with regard to their phase sensitivity but especially to the extent of the sensor-intrinsic phase noise. Both measurements and calculations reveal that the fundamental LOD is limited by additive phase noise due to thermal-mechanical noise of the resonator, i.e. by thermally induced random vibrations of the cantilever, and by thermal-electrical noise of the piezoelectric material. However, due to losses in the magnetic material parametric flicker phase noise arises, limiting the overall performance. In particular it is shown that the LOD is virtually independent of the magnetic sensitivity but is solely determined by the magnetic losses. Instead of the sensitivity, the magnetic losses, represented by the material&#39;s effective complex permeability, should be considered as the most important parameter for the further improvement of such sensors in the future. This implication is not only valid for magnetoelastic cantilevers but also applies to any type of magnetoelastic resonator.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Noise Analysis of Open-Loop and Closed-Loop SAW Magnetic Field Sensor Systems

Transmission surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors are widely used in various fields of application. In order to maximize the limit of detection (LOD) of such sensor systems, it is of high importance to understand and to be able to quantify the relevant noise sources. In this paper, low noise readout systems for the application with a SAW delay line magnetic field sensor in an open-loop and closed-loop configuration are presented and analyzed with regard to their phase noise contribution. By applying oscillator phase noise theory to closed-loop sensor systems, it is shown that the phase noise of the SAW delay line oscillator can be predicted accurately. This allows the derivation of expressions for the limits of detection for both readout structures. Based on these equations, the equivalence between the LOD of open-loop and closed-loop SAW delay line readout can be shown analytically, assuming that the sensor contributes the dominant phase noise. This equality is verified by measurements. These results are applicable to all kinds of phase sensitive delay line sensors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Phase-Noise and Amplitude-Noise Measurement of DACs and DDSs

This article proposes a method for the measurement of Phase Noise (PN, or PM noise) and Amplitude Noise (AN, or AM noise) of Digital-to-Analog Converters (DAC) and Direct Digital Synthesizers (DDS) based on modulation-index amplification. The carrier is first reduced by a controlled amount (30-40 dB) by adding a reference signal of nearly equal amplitude and opposite in phase. Then, residual carrier and noise sidebands are amplified and sent to a conventional PN analyzer. The main virtues of our method are: (i) the noise specs of the PN analyzer are relaxed by a factor equal to the carrier suppression ratio; and, (ii) the capability to measure the AN using a PN analyzer, with no need for the analyzer to feature AN measurement. An obvious variant enables AN and PN measurements using an AN analyzer with no PN measurement capability. Such instrument is extremely simple and easy to implement with a power-detector diode followed by a FFT analyzer. Unlike the classical bridge (interferometric) method, there is no need for external line stretcher and variable attenuators because phase and amplitude control is implemented in the device under test. In one case (AD9144), we could measure the noise over 10 decades of frequency. The flicker noise matches the exact $1/f$ law with a maximum discrepancy of $\pm1$ dB over 7.5 decades. Thanks to simplicity, reliability, and low background noise, this method has the potential to become the standard method for the AN and PN measurement of DACs and DDSs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access