Source author record

Enrico Miglierina

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

10works
2topics
4close collaborators

Published work

10 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Explicit models of ℓ1\ell_1-preduals and the weak∗^* fixed point property in ℓ1\ell_1

We provide a concrete isometric description of all the preduals of ℓ1\ell_1 for which the standard basis in ℓ1\ell_1 has a finite number of w∗w^*-limit points. Then, we apply this result to give an example of an ℓ1\ell_1-predual XX such that its dual X∗X^* lacks the weak∗^* fixed point property for nonexpansive mappings (briefly, w∗w^*-FPP), but XX does not contain an isometric copy of any hyperplane WαW_α of the space cc of convergent sequences such that WαW_α is a predual of ℓ1\ell_1 and Wα∗W_α^* lacks the w∗w^*-FPP. This answers a question left open in the 2017 paper of the present authors.

preprint2020arXiv

A variational approach to the alternating projections method

The 2-sets convex feasibility problem aims at finding a point in the nonempty intersection of two closed convex sets AA and BB in a Hilbert space XX. The method of alternating projections is the simplest iterative procedure for finding a solution and it goes back to von Neumann. In the present paper, we study some stability properties for this method in the following sense: we consider two sequences of sets, each of them converging, with respect to the Attouch-Wets variational convergence, respectively, to AA and BB. Given a starting point a0a_0, we consider the sequences of points obtained by projecting on the "perturbed" sets, i.e., the sequences {an}\{a_n\} and {bn}\{b_n\} given by bn=PBn(an−1)b_n=P_{B_n}(a_{n-1}) and an=PAn(bn)a_n=P_{A_n}(b_n). Under appropriate geometrical and topological assumptions on the intersection of the limit sets, we ensure that the sequences {an}\{a_n\} and {bn}\{b_n\} converge in norm to a point in the intersection of AA and BB. In particular, we consider both when the intersection A∩BA\cap B reduces to a singleton and when the interior of A∩BA \cap B is nonempty. Finally we consider the case in which the limit sets AA and BB are subspaces.

preprint2020arXiv

Regularity and stability for a convex feasibility problem

Let us consider two sequences of closed convex sets {An}\{A_n\} and {Bn}\{B_n\} converging with respect to the Attouch-Wets convergence to AA and BB, respectively. Given a starting point a0a_0, we consider the sequences of points obtained by projecting on the "perturbed" sets, i.e., the sequences {an}\{a_n\} and {bn}\{b_n\} defined inductively by bn=PBn(an−1)b_n=P_{B_n}(a_{n-1}) and an=PAn(bn)a_n=P_{A_n}(b_n). Suppose that A∩BA\cap B (or a suitable substitute if A∩B=∅A \cap B=\emptyset) is bounded, we prove that if the couple (A,B)(A,B) is (boundedly) regular then the couple (A,B)(A,B) is dd-stable, i.e., for each {an}\{a_n\} and {bn}\{b_n\} as above we have dist(an,A∩B)→0\mathrm{dist}(a_n,A\cap B)\to 0 and dist(bn,A∩B)→0\mathrm{dist}(b_n,A\cap B)\to 0.

preprint2016arXiv

Stability constants of the weak∗^* fixed point property for the space ℓ1\ell_1

The main aim of the paper is to study some quantitative aspects of the stability of the weak∗^* fixed point property for nonexpansive maps in ℓ1\ell_1 (shortly, w∗w^*-fpp). We focus on two complementary approaches to this topic. First, given a predual XX of ℓ1\ell_1 such that the σ(ℓ1,X)σ(\ell_1,X)-fpp holds, we precisely establish how far, with respect to the Banach-Mazur distance, we can move from XX without losing the w∗w^*-fpp. The interesting point to note here is that our estimate depends only on the smallest radius of the ball in ℓ1\ell_1 containing all σ(ℓ1,X)σ(\ell_1,X)-cluster points of the extreme points of the unit ball. Second, we pass to consider the stability of the w∗w^*-fpp in the restricted framework of preduals of ℓ1\ell_1. Namely, we show that every predual XX of ℓ1\ell_1 with a distance from c0c_0 strictly less than 33, induces a weak∗^* topology on ℓ1\ell_1 such that the σ(ℓ1,X)σ(\ell_1,X)-fpp holds.

preprint2016arXiv

Weak∗^* Fixed Point Property in ℓ1\ell_1 and Polyhedrality in Lindenstrauss Spaces

The aim of this paper is to study the w∗w^*-fixed point property for nonexpansive mappings in the duals of separable Lindenstrauss spaces by means of suitable geometrical properties of the dual ball. First we show that a property concerning the behaviour of a class of w∗w^*-closed subsets of the dual sphere is equivalent to the w∗w^*-fixed point property. Then, the main result of our paper shows an equivalence between another, stronger geometrical property of the dual ball and the stable w∗w^*-fixed point property. The last geometrical notion was introduced by Fonf and Veselý as a strengthening of the notion of polyhedrality. In the last section we show that also the first geometrical assumption that we have introduced can be related to a polyhedral concept for the predual space. Indeed, we give a hierarchical structure among various polyhedrality notions in the framework of Lindenstrauss spaces. Finally, as a by-product, we obtain an improvement of an old result about the norm-preserving compact extension of compact operators.

preprint2015arXiv

Rethinking Polyhedrality for Lindenstrauss Spaces

A recent example by the authors (see arXiv:1503.09088 [math.FA]) shows that an old result of Zippin about the existence of an isometric copy of cc in a separable Lindenstrauss space is incorrect. The same example proves that some characterizations of polyhedral Lindenstrauss spaces, based on the result of Zippin, are false. The main result of the present paper provides a new characterization of polyhedrality for the preduals of ℓ1\ell_{1} and gives a correct proof for one of the older. Indeed, we prove that for a space XX such that X∗=ℓ1X^{*}=\ell_{1} the following properties are equivalent: (1) XX is a polyhedral space; (2) XX does not contain an isometric copy of cc; (3) sup⁡{x∗(x) : x∗∈ext(BX∗)∖D(x)}<1\sup\left\{ x^{*}(x)\,:\, x^{*}\in\mathrm{ext}\left(B_{X^{*}}\right)\setminus D(x)\right\} <1 for each x∈SXx\in S_{X}, where D(x)={x∗∈SX∗:x∗(x)=1}D(x)=\left\{ x^{*}\in S_{X^{*}}:x^{*}(x)=1\right\}. By known theory, from our result follows that a generic Lindenstrauss space is polyhedral if and only if it does not contain an isometric copy of cc. Moreover, a correct version of the result of Zippin is derived as a corollary of the main result.

preprint2015arXiv

Separable Lindenstrauss spaces whose duals lack the weak∗^* fixed point property for nonexpansive mappings

In this paper we study the w∗w^*-fixed point property for nonexpansive mappings. First we show that the dual space X∗X^* lacks the w∗w^*-fixed point property whenever XX contains an isometric copy of the space cc. Then, the main result of our paper provides several characterizations of weak-star topologies that fail the fixed point property for nonexpansive mappings in ℓ1\ell_1 space. This result allows us to obtain a characterization of all separable Lindenstrauss spaces XX inducing the failure of w∗w^*-fixed point property in X∗X^*.

preprint2012arXiv

Reflexive Cones

Reflexive cones in Banach spaces are cones with weakly compact intersection with the unit ball. In this paper we study the structure of this class of cones. We investigate the relations between the notion of reflexive cones and the properties of their bases. This allows us to prove a characterization of reflexive cones in term of the absence of a subcone isomorphic to the positive cone of \ell_{1}. Moreover, the properties of some specific classes of reflexive cones are investigated. Namely, we consider the reflexive cones such that the intersection with the unit ball is norm compact, those generated by a Schauder basis and the reflexive cones regarded as ordering cones in a Banach spaces. Finally, it is worth to point out that a characterization of reflexive spaces and also of the Schur spaces by the properties of reflexive cones is given.

preprint2012arXiv

Some results on condition numbers in convex multiobjective optimization

Various notions of condition numbers are used to study some sensitivity aspects of scalar optimization problems. The aim of this paper is to introduce a notion of condition number to study the case of a multiobjective optimization problem defined via m convex C^1,1 objective functions on a given closed ball in R^n. Two approaches are proposed: the first one adopts a local point of view around a given solution point, whereas the second one considers the solution set as a whole. A comparison between the two notions of well-conditioned problem is developed. We underline that both the condition numbers introduced in the present work reduce to the same of condition number proposed by Zolezzi in 2003, in the special case of the scalar optimization problem considered there. A pseudodistance between functions is defined such that the condition number provides an upper bound on how far from a well-conditioned function f a perturbed function g can be chosen in order that g is well-conditioned too. For both the local and the global approach an extension of classical Eckart-Young distance theorem is proved, even if only a special class of perturbations is considered.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.