Paper detail

A variational approach to the alternating projections method

The 2-sets convex feasibility problem aims at finding a point in the nonempty intersection of two closed convex sets $A$ and $B$ in a Hilbert space $X$. The method of alternating projections is the simplest iterative procedure for finding a solution and it goes back to von Neumann. In the present paper, we study some stability properties for this method in the following sense: we consider two sequences of sets, each of them converging, with respect to the Attouch-Wets variational convergence, respectively, to $A$ and $B$. Given a starting point $a_0$, we consider the sequences of points obtained by projecting on the "perturbed" sets, i.e., the sequences $\{a_n\}$ and $\{b_n\}$ given by $b_n=P_{B_n}(a_{n-1})$ and $a_n=P_{A_n}(b_n)$. Under appropriate geometrical and topological assumptions on the intersection of the limit sets, we ensure that the sequences $\{a_n\}$ and $\{b_n\}$ converge in norm to a point in the intersection of $A$ and $B$. In particular, we consider both when the intersection $A\cap B$ reduces to a singleton and when the interior of $A \cap B$ is nonempty. Finally we consider the case in which the limit sets $A$ and $B$ are subspaces.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.