Rethinking Polyhedrality for Lindenstrauss Spaces

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

A recent example by the authors (see arXiv:1503.09088 [math.FA]) shows that an old result of Zippin about the existence of an isometric copy of cc in a separable Lindenstrauss space is incorrect. The same example proves that some characterizations of polyhedral Lindenstrauss spaces, based on the result of Zippin, are false. The main result of the present paper provides a new characterization of polyhedrality for the preduals of ℓ1\ell_{1} and gives a correct proof for one of the older. Indeed, we prove that for a space XX such that X∗=ℓ1X^{*}=\ell_{1} the following properties are equivalent: (1) XX is a polyhedral space; (2) XX does not contain an isometric copy of cc; (3) sup⁡{x∗(x) : x∗∈ext(BX∗)∖D(x)}<1\sup\left\{ x^{*}(x)\,:\, x^{*}\in\mathrm{ext}\left(B_{X^{*}}\right)\setminus D(x)\right\} <1 for each x∈SXx\in S_{X}, where D(x)={x∗∈SX∗:x∗(x)=1}D(x)=\left\{ x^{*}\in S_{X^{*}}:x^{*}(x)=1\right\}. By known theory, from our result follows that a generic Lindenstrauss space is polyhedral if and only if it does not contain an isometric copy of cc. Moreover, a correct version of the result of Zippin is derived as a corollary of the main result.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.