BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Emil Jeřábek

Emil Jeřábek appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Logic in Computer Sciencemath.LOComputational ComplexityData Structures and Algorithms

Catalog footprint

What is connected

19works
4topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

19 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On the proof complexity of logics of bounded branching

We investigate the proof complexity of extended Frege (EF) systems for basic transitive modal logics (K4, S4, GL, ...) augmented with the bounded branching axioms $\mathbf{BB}_k$. First, we study feasibility of the disjunction property and more general extension rules in EF systems for these logics: we show that the corresponding decision problems reduce to total coNP search problems (or equivalently, disjoint NP pairs, in the binary case); more precisely, the decision problem for extension rules is equivalent to a certain special case of interpolation for the classical EF system. Next, we use this characterization to prove superpolynomial (or even exponential, with stronger hypotheses) separations between EF and substitution Frege (SF) systems for all transitive logics contained in $\mathbf{S4.2GrzBB_2}$ or $\mathbf{GL.2BB_2}$ under some assumptions weaker than $\mathrm{PSPACE \ne NP}$. We also prove analogous results for superintuitionistic logics: we characterize the decision complexity of multi-conclusion Visser's rules in EF systems for Gabbay--de Jongh logics $\mathbf T_k$, and we show conditional separations between EF and SF for all intermediate logics contained in $\mathbf{T_2 + KC}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Iterated multiplication in $VTC^0$

We show that $VTC^0$, the basic theory of bounded arithmetic corresponding to the complexity class $\mathrm{TC}^0$, proves the $IMUL$ axiom expressing the totality of iterated multiplication satisfying its recursive definition, by formalizing a suitable version of the $\mathrm{TC}^0$ iterated multiplication algorithm by Hesse, Allender, and Barrington. As a consequence, $VTC^0$ can also prove the integer division axiom, and (by our previous results) the RSUV-translation of induction and minimization for sharply bounded formulas. Similar consequences hold for the related theories $Δ^b_1$-$CR$ and $C^0_2$. As a side result, we also prove that there is a well-behaved $Δ_0$ definition of modular powering in $IΔ_0+WPHP(Δ_0)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The theory of hereditarily bounded sets

We show that for any $k\inω$, the structure $(H_k,\in)$ of sets that are hereditarily of size at most $k$ is decidable. We provide a transparent complete axiomatization of its theory, a quantifier elimination result, and tight bounds on its computational complexity. This stands in stark contrast to the structure $V_ω=\bigcup_k H_k$ of hereditarily finite sets, which is well known to be bi-interpretable with the standard model of arithmetic $(\mathbb N,+,\cdot)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Rules with parameters in modal logic II

We analyze the computational complexity of admissibility and unifiability with parameters in transitive modal logics. The class of cluster-extensible (clx) logics was introduced in the first part of this series of papers. We completely classify the complexity of unifiability or inadmissibility in any clx logic as being complete for one of $Σ^{\exp}_2$, NEXP, coNEXP, PSPACE, or $Π^p_2$. In addition to the main case where arbitrary parameters are allowed, we consider restricted problems with the number of parameters bounded by a constant, and the parameter-free case. Our upper bounds are specific to clx logics, but we also include similar results for logics of bounded depth and width. In contrast, our lower bounds are very general: they apply each to a class of all transitive logics whose frames allow occurrence of certain finite subframes. We also discuss the baseline problem of complexity of derivability: it is coNP-complete or PSPACE-complete for each clx logic. In particular, we prove PSPACE-hardness of derivability for a broad class of transitive logics that includes all logics with the disjunction property.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Induction rules in bounded arithmetic

We study variants of Buss's theories of bounded arithmetic axiomatized by induction schemes disallowing the use of parameters, and closely related induction inference rules. We put particular emphasis on $\hatΠ^b_i$ induction schemes, which were so far neglected in the literature. We present inclusions and conservation results between the systems (including a witnessing theorem for $T^i_2$ and $S^i_2$ of a new form), results on numbers of instances of the axioms or rules, connections to reflection principles for quantified propositional calculi, and separations between the systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Recursive functions and existentially closed structures

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the relationship between various conditions implying essential undecidability: our main result is that there exists a theory $T$ in which all partially recursive functions are representable, yet $T$ does not interpret Robinson's theory $R$. To this end, we borrow tools from model theory--specifically, we investigate model-theoretic properties of the model completion of the empty theory in a language with function symbols. We obtain a certain characterization of $\exists\forall$ theories interpretable in existential theories in the process.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Division by zero

For any sufficiently strong theory of arithmetic, the set of Diophantine equations provably unsolvable in the theory is algorithmically undecidable, as a consequence of the MRDP theorem. In contrast, we show decidability of Diophantine equations provably unsolvable in Robinson's arithmetic Q. The argument hinges on an analysis of a particular class of equations, hitherto unexplored in Diophantine literature. We also axiomatize the universal fragment of Q in the process.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Proof complexity of intuitionistic implicational formulas

We study implicational formulas in the context of proof complexity of intuitionistic propositional logic (IPC). On the one hand, we give an efficient transformation of tautologies to implicational tautologies that preserves the lengths of intuitionistic extended Frege (EF) or substitution Frege (SF) proofs up to a polynomial. On the other hand, EF proofs in the implicational fragment of IPC polynomially simulate full intuitionistic logic for implicational tautologies. The results also apply to other fragments of other superintuitionistic logics under certain conditions. In particular, the exponential lower bounds on the length of intuitionistic EF proofs by Hrubeš \cite{hru:lbint}, generalized to exponential separation between EF and SF systems in superintuitionistic logics of unbounded branching by Jeřábek \cite{ej:sfef}, can be realized by implicational tautologies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Integer factoring and modular square roots

Buresh-Oppenheim proved that the NP search problem to find nontrivial factors of integers of a special form belongs to Papadimitriou's class PPA, and is probabilistically reducible to a problem in PPP. In this paper, we use ideas from bounded arithmetic to extend these results to arbitrary integers. We show that general integer factoring is reducible in randomized polynomial time to a PPA problem and to the problem WEAKPIGEON in PPP. Both reductions can be derandomized under the assumption of the generalized Riemann hypothesis. We also show (unconditionally) that PPA contains some related problems, such as square root computation modulo n, and finding quadratic nonresidues modulo n.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Rules with parameters in modal logic I

We study admissibility of inference rules and unification with parameters in transitive modal logics (extensions of K4), in particular we generalize various results on parameter-free admissibility and unification to the setting with parameters. Specifically, we give a characterization of projective formulas generalizing Ghilardi's characterization in the parameter-free case, leading to new proofs of Rybakov's results that admissibility with parameters is decidable and unification is finitary for logics satisfying suitable frame extension properties (called cluster-extensible logics in this paper). We construct explicit bases of admissible rules with parameters for cluster-extensible logics, and give their semantic description. We show that in the case of finitely many parameters, these logics have independent bases of admissible rules, and determine which logics have finite bases. As a sideline, we show that cluster-extensible logics have various nice properties: in particular, they are finitely axiomatizable, and have an exponential-size model property. We also give a rather general characterization of logics with directed (filtering) unification. In the sequel, we will use the same machinery to investigate the computational complexity of admissibility and unification with parameters in cluster-extensible logics, and we will adapt the results to logics with unique top cluster (e.g., S4.2) and superintuitionistic logics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Open induction in a bounded arithmetic for TC^0

The elementary arithmetic operations $+,\cdot,\le$ on integers are well-known to be computable in the weak complexity class $\mathrm{TC}^0$, and it is a basic question what properties of these operations can be proved using only $\mathrm{TC}^0$-computable objects, i.e., in a theory of bounded arithmetic corresponding to $\mathrm{TC}^0$. We will show that the theory $\mathit{VTC}^0$ extended with an axiom postulating the totality of iterated multiplication (which is computable in $\mathrm{TC}^0$) proves induction for quantifier-free formulas in the language $\langle +,\cdot,\le \rangle$ (IOpen), and more generally, minimization for $Σ^b_0$ formulas in the language of Buss's $S_2$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Blending margins: The modal logic K has nullary unification type

We investigate properties of the formula $p \to \Box p$ in the basic modal logic K. We show that K satisfies an infinitary weaker variant of the rule of margins $ϕ\to \Boxϕ/ ϕ, \negϕ$, and as a consequence, we obtain various negative results about admissibility and unification in K. We describe a complete set of unifiers (i.e., substitutions making the formula provable) of $p \to \Box p$, and use it to establish that K has the worst possible unification type: nullary. In well-behaved transitive modal logics, admissibility and unification can be analyzed in terms of projective formulas, introduced by Ghilardi; in particular, projective formulas coincide for these logics with formulas that are admissibly saturated (i.e., derive all their multiple-conclusion admissible consequences) or exact (i.e., axiomatize a theory of a substitution). In contrast, we show that in K, the formula $p \to \Box p$ is admissibly saturated, but neither projective nor exact. All our results for K also apply to the basic description logic ALC.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Cluster expansion and the boxdot conjecture

The boxdot conjecture asserts that every normal modal logic that faithfully interprets T by the well-known boxdot translation is in fact included in T. We confirm that the conjecture is true. More generally, we present a simple semantic condition on modal logics $L_0$ which ensures that the largest logic where $L_0$ embeds faithfully by the boxdot translation is $L_0$ itself. In particular, this natural generalization of the boxdot conjecture holds for S4, S5, and KTB in place of T.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Root finding with threshold circuits

We show that for any constant d, complex roots of degree d univariate rational (or Gaussian rational) polynomials---given by a list of coefficients in binary---can be computed to a given accuracy by a uniform TC^0 algorithm (a uniform family of constant-depth polynomial-size threshold circuits). The basic idea is to compute the inverse function of the polynomial by a power series. We also discuss an application to the theory VTC^0 of bounded arithmetic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The ubiquity of conservative translations

We study the notion of conservative translation between logics introduced by Feitosa and D'Ottaviano. We show that classical propositional logic (CPC) is universal in the sense that every finitary consequence relation over a countable set of formulas can be conservatively translated into CPC. The translation is computable if the consequence relation is decidable. More generally, we show that one can take instead of CPC a broad class of logics (extensions of a certain fragment of full Lambek calculus FL) including most nonclassical logics studied in the literature, hence in a sense, (almost) any two reasonable deductive systems can be conservatively translated into each other. We also provide some counterexamples, in particular the paraconsistent logic LP is not universal.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access