Source author record

Mohammad Golshani

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

38works
3topics
4close collaborators

Published work

38 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Graphs represented by Ext

This paper opens and discusses the question originally due to Daniel Herden, who asked for which graph (μ,R)(μ,R) we can find a family {Gα:α<μ}\{\mathbb G_α: α< μ\} of abelian groups such that for each α,β∈μα,β\inμ: Ext(Gα,Gβ)=0⟺(α,β)∈R.Ext(\mathbb G_α, \mathbb G_β) = 0 \Longleftrightarrow(α,β) \in R. In this regard, we present four results. First, we give a connection to Quillen's small object argument which helps ExtExt vanishes and uses to present useful criteria to the question. Suppose λ=λℵ0λ= λ^{\aleph_0} and μ=2λμ= 2^λ. We apply Jensen's diamond principle along with the criteria to present λλ-free abelian groups representing bipartite graphs. Third, we use a version of the black box to construct in ZFC, a family of ℵ1\aleph_1-free abelian groups representing bipartite graphs. Finally, applying forcing techniques, we present a consistent positive answer for general graphs.

preprint2022arXiv

Iterated Ramsey bounds for the Hales-Jewett numbers

Consider the Hales-Jewett theorem. The kk-dimensional version of it tells us that the combinatorial space UM,Λ={η∣η:M→Λ}\mathcal{U}_{M, Λ} = \{ η\mid η: M \to Λ\} has, under suitable assumptions, monochromatic kk-dimensional subspaces, where by a kk-dimensional subspace we mean there exist a partition ⟨N0,N1,⋯ ,Nk⟩\langle N_0, N_1, \cdots, N_k \rangle of MM such that N1,⋯ ,Nk≠∅N_1, \cdots, N_k \neq \emptyset (but we allow N0N_0 to be empty) and some ρ0:N0→Λρ_0: N_0 \to Λ, such that the subspace consists of those ρ∈UM,Λρ\in \mathcal{U}_{M, Λ} such that for 0<l<k+1,ρ↾Nl0<l<k+1, ρ\restriction N_l is constant and ρ↾N0=ρ0.ρ\restriction N_0= ρ_0. It seems natural to think it is better to have each Nl,0<l<k+1N_{l}, 0<l<k+1 a singleton. However it is then impossible to always find monochromatic kk-dimensional subspaces (for example color ηη by 00 if ∣η−1{α}∣|η^{-1}\{α\}| is an even number and by 11 otherwise). But modulo restricting the sign of each ∣η−1{α}∣|η^{-1}\{α\}|, we prove the parallel theorem -- whose proof is not related to the Hales-Jewett theorem. We then connect the two numbers by showing that the Hales-Jewett numbers are not too much above the present ones. This gives an alternative proof of the Hales-Jewett theorem.

preprint2022arXiv

NNR Revisited

We show if we use countable support iteration of forcing notions not adding reals that satisfy additional conditions, then the limit forcing does not add reals. As a result we prove that we can amalgamate two earlier methods and prove the consistency with ZFC + GCH of two statements gotten separately earlier: Souslin hypothesis and non-club guessing. We also answer a question of Justin Moore by proving the consistency of one further case of "strong failure of club guessing" with GCH.

preprint2022arXiv

The Keisler-Shelah isomorphism theorem and the continuum hypothesis

We show that if for any two elementary equivalent structures M,N\mathbf{M}, \mathbf{N} of size at most continuum in a countable language, Mω/U≃Nω/U\mathbf{M}^ω/ \mathcal{U} \simeq \mathbf{N}^ω/ \mathcal{U} for some ultrafilter U\mathcal{U} on ω,ω, then CHCH holds. We also provide some consistency results about Keisler and Shelah isomorphism theorems in the absence of CHCH.

preprint2021arXiv

Combinatorial and number-theoretic properties of generic reals

We discuss some properties of Cohen and random reals. We show that they belong to any definable partition regular family, and hence they satisfy most "largeness" properties studied in Ramsey theory. We determine their position in the Mahler's classification of the reals and using it, we get some information about Liouville numbers. We also show that they are wild in the sense of o-minimality, i.e., they define the set of integers.

preprint2021arXiv

Two remarks on Merimovich's model of the total failure of GCH

Let MM denote the Merimovich's model in which for each infinite cardinal λ,2λ=λ+3λ, 2^λ=λ^{+3}. We show that in MM the following hold: (1) Shelah's strong hypothesis fails at all singular cardinals, indeed, ∀λ(λ\forall λ(λ is a singular cardinal ⇒pp(λ)=λ+3).\Rightarrow pp(λ)=λ^{+3}). (2) For each singular cardinal λλ there is an inner model NN of MM such that MM and NN have the same bounded subsets of λ,λ, λλ is a singular cardinal in NN, (λ+i)N=(λ+i)M(λ^{+i})^N=(λ^{+i})^M, for i=1,2,3,i=1,2,3, and N⊨2λ=λ+N \models 2^λ=λ^{+}. Thus it is possible to add many new fresh subsets to λλ without adding any new bounded subsets to λλ.

preprint2020arXiv

Specializing trees and answer to a question of Williams

We show that if cf(2ℵ0)=ℵ1,cf(2^{\aleph_0})=\aleph_1, then any non-trivial ℵ1\aleph_1-closed forcing notion of size ≤2ℵ0\leq 2^{\aleph_0} is forcing equivalent to Add(ℵ1,1),Add(\aleph_1, 1), the Cohen forcing for adding a new Cohen subset of ω1.ω_1. We also produce, relative to the existence of suitable large cardinals, a model of ZFCZFC in which 2ℵ0=ℵ22^{\aleph_0}=\aleph_2 and all ℵ1\aleph_1-closed forcing notion of size ≤2ℵ0\leq 2^{\aleph_0} collapse ℵ2,\aleph_2, and hence are forcing equivalent to Add(ℵ1,1).Add(\aleph_1, 1). These results answer a question of Scott Williams from 1978. We also extend a result of Todorcevic and Foreman-Magidor-Shelah by showing that it is consistent that every partial order which adds a new subset of ℵ2,\aleph_2, collapses ℵ2\aleph_2 or ℵ3.\aleph_3.

preprint2020arXiv

The generalized Kurepa hypothesis at singular cardinals

We discuss the generalized Kurepa hypothesis KHλKH_λ at singular cardinals λλ. In particular, we answer questions of Erdös-Hajnal [1] and Todorcevic [6], [7] by showing that GCHGCH does not imply KHℵωKH_{\aleph_ω} nor the existence of a family F⊆[ℵω]ℵ0 \mathcal{F} \subseteq [\aleph_ω]^{\aleph_0} of size ℵω+1\aleph_{ω+1} such that F↾X\mathcal{F} \restriction X has size ℵ0\aleph_0 for every X⊆S,∣X∣=ℵ0X \subseteq S, |X|=\aleph_0.

preprint2016arXiv

An Easton like theorem in the presence of Shelah Cardinals

We show that Shelah cardinals are preserved under the canonical GCHGCH forcing notion. We also show that if GCHGCH holds and F:REG→CARDF:REG\rightarrow CARD is an Easton function which satisfies some weak properties, then there exists a cofinality preserving generic extension of the universe which preserves Shelah cardinals and satisfies ∀κ∈REG, 2κ=F(κ)\forall κ\in REG,~ 2^κ=F(κ). This gives a partial answer to a question asked by Cody [1] and independently by Honzik [5]. We also prove an indestructibility result for Shelah cardinals.

preprint2016arXiv

Notes on countably generated complete Boolean algebras

We give a necessary and sufficient condition for an atomless Boolean algebra to be countably generated, and use it to give new proofs of some some know facts due to Gaifman-Hales and Solovay and also due to Jech, Kunen and Magidor. We also show that Jensen's coding theorem can be used to provide cardinal preserving countably generated complete Boolean algebras of arbitrary large cardinality. This answers a question of Jech [5] from 1976.

preprint2016arXiv

Tree property at successor of a singular limit of measurable cardinals

Assume λλ is a singular limit of ηη supercompact cardinals, where η≤λη\leq λ is a limit ordinal. We present two forcing methods for making λ+λ^+ the successor of the limit of the first ηη measurable cardinals while the tree property holding at λ+.λ^+. The first method is then used to get, from the same assumptions, tree property at ℵη2+1\aleph_{η^2+1} with the failure of SCHSCH at ℵη2\aleph_{η^2}. This extends results of Neeman and Sinapova. The second method is also used to get tree property at successor of an arbitrary singular cardinal, which extends some results of Magidor-Shelah, Neeman and Sinapova.

preprint2015arXiv

Killing the GCH everywhere with a single real

Shelah-Woodin investigate the possibility of violating instances of GCHGCH through the addition of a single real. In particular they show that it is possible to obtain a failure of CHCH by adding a single real to a model of GCHGCH, preserving cofinalities. In this article we strengthen their result by showing that it is possible to violate GCHGCH at all infinite cardinals by adding a single real to a model of GCH.GCH. Our assumption is the existence of an H(κ+3)H(κ^{+3})-strong cardinal, by work of Gitik and Mitchell it is known that more than an H(κ++)H(κ^{++})-strong cardinal is required.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.