Abstract
We investigate properties of the formula in the basic modal logic K. We show that K satisfies an infinitary weaker variant of the rule of margins , and as a consequence, we obtain various negative results about admissibility and unification in K. We describe a complete set of unifiers (i.e., substitutions making the formula provable) of , and use it to establish that K has the worst possible unification type: nullary. In well-behaved transitive modal logics, admissibility and unification can be analyzed in terms of projective formulas, introduced by Ghilardi; in particular, projective formulas coincide for these logics with formulas that are admissibly saturated (i.e., derive all their multiple-conclusion admissible consequences) or exact (i.e., axiomatize a theory of a substitution). In contrast, we show that in K, the formula is admissibly saturated, but neither projective nor exact. All our results for K also apply to the basic description logic ALC.
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.