BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Eiichi Bannai

Eiichi Bannai contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.COmath.NTmath-phmath.GRmath.HOmath.MPquant-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

The complex conjugate invariants of Clifford groups

Nebe, Rains and Sloane studied the polynomial invariants for real and complex Clifford groups and they relate the invariants to the space of complete weight enumerators of certain self-dual codes. The purpose of this paper is to show that very similar results can be obtained for the invariants of the complex Clifford group $\mathcal{X}_m$ acting on the space of conjugate polynomials in $2^m$ variables of degree $N_1$ in $x_f$ and of degree $N_2$ in their complex conjugates $\overline{x_f}$. In particular, we show that the dimension of this space is $2$, for $(N_1,N_2)=(5,5)$. This solves the Conjecture 2 given in Zhu, Kueng, Grassl and Gross affirmatively. In other words if an orbit of the complex Clifford group is a projective $4$-design, then it is automatically a projective $5$-design.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

On the explicit constructions of certain unitary $t$-designs

Unitary $t$-designs are `good' finite subsets of the unitary group $U(d)$ that approximate the whole unitary group $U(d)$ well. Unitary $t$-designs have been applied in randomized benchmarking, tomography, quantum cryptography and many other areas of quantum information science. If a unitary $t$-design itself is a group then it is called a unitary $t$-group. Although it is known that unitary $t$-designs in $U(d)$ exist for any $t$ and $d$, the unitary $t$-groups do not exist for $t\geq 4$ if $d\geq 3$, as it is shown by Guralnick-Tiep (2005) and Bannai-Navarro-Rizo-Tiep (BNRT, 2018). Explicit constructions of exact unitary $t$-designs in $U(d)$ are not easy in general. In particular, explicit constructions of unitary $4$-designs in $U(4)$ have been an open problem in quantum information theory. We prove that some exact unitary $(t+1)$-designs in the unitary group $U(d)$ are constructed from unitary $t$-groups in $U(d)$ that satisfy certain specific conditions. Based on this result, we specifically construct exact unitary $3$-designs in $U(3)$ from the unitary $2$-group $SL(3,2)$ in $U(3),$ and also unitary $4$-designs in $U(4)$ from the unitary $3$-group $Sp(4,3)$ in $U(4)$ numerically. We also discuss some related problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Maximal $m$-distance sets containing the representation of the Johnson graph $J(n, m)$

We classify the maximal $m$-distance sets in $\mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ which contain the representation of the Johnson graph $J(n, m)$ for $m = 2, 3$. Furthermore, we determine the necessary and sufficient condition for $n$ and $m$ such that the representation of the Johnson graph $J(n, m)$ is not maximal as an $m$-distance set. Also, we classify the maximal two-distance sets in $\mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ which contain the representation of $J(n - 1, 2)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Toy models for D. H. Lehmer's conjecture II

In the previous paper, we studied the "Toy models for D. H. Lehmer's conjecture". Namely, we showed that the m-th Fourier coefficient of the weighted theta series of the $\mathbb{Z}^2$-lattice and the $A_{2}$-lattice does not vanish, when the shell of norm $m$ of those lattices is not the empty set. In other words, the spherical 4 (resp. 6)-design does not exist among the nonempty shells in the $\mathbb{Z}^2$-lattice (resp. $A_{2}$-lattice). This paper is the sequel to the previous paper. We take 2-dimensional lattices associated to the algebraic integers of imaginary quadratic fields whose class number is either 1 or 2, except for $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-1})$ and $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-3})$, then, show that the $m$-th Fourier coefficient of the weighted theta series of those lattices does not vanish, when the shell of norm $m$ of those lattices is not the empty set. Equivalently, we show that the corresponding spherical 2-design does not exist among the nonempty shells in those lattices.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Toy models for D. H. Lehmer's conjecture

In 1947, Lehmer conjectured that the Ramanujan $τ$-function $τ(m)$ never vanishes for all positive integers $m$, where the $τ(m)$ are the Fourier coefficients of the cusp form $Δ_{24}$ of weight 12. Lehmer verified the conjecture in 1947 for $m<214928639999$. In 1973, Serre verified up to $m<10^{15}$, and in 1999, Jordan and Kelly for $m<22689242781695999$. The theory of spherical $t$-design, and in particular those which are the shells of Euclidean lattices, is closely related to the theory of modular forms, as first shown by Venkov in 1984. In particular, Ramanujan&#39;s $τ$-function gives the coefficients of a weighted theta series of the $E_{8}$-lattice. It is shown, by Venkov, de la Harpe, and Pache, that $τ(m)=0$ is equivalent to the fact that the shell of norm $2m$ of the $E_{8}$-lattice is an 8-design. So, Lehmer&#39;s conjecture is reformulated in terms of spherical $t$-design. Lehmer&#39;s conjecture is difficult to prove, and still remains open. In this paper, we consider toy models of Lehmer&#39;s conjecture. Namely, we show that the $m$-th Fourier coefficient of the weighted theta series of the $\mathbb{Z}^2$-lattice and the $A_{2}$-lattice does not vanish, when the shell of norm $m$ of those lattices is not the empty set. In other words, the spherical 5 (resp. 7)-design does not exist among the shells in the $\mathbb{Z}^2$-lattice (resp. $A_{2}$-lattice).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access