Paper detail

Toy models for D. H. Lehmer's conjecture

In 1947, Lehmer conjectured that the Ramanujan $τ$-function $τ(m)$ never vanishes for all positive integers $m$, where the $τ(m)$ are the Fourier coefficients of the cusp form $Δ_{24}$ of weight 12. Lehmer verified the conjecture in 1947 for $m<214928639999$. In 1973, Serre verified up to $m<10^{15}$, and in 1999, Jordan and Kelly for $m<22689242781695999$. The theory of spherical $t$-design, and in particular those which are the shells of Euclidean lattices, is closely related to the theory of modular forms, as first shown by Venkov in 1984. In particular, Ramanujan&#39;s $τ$-function gives the coefficients of a weighted theta series of the $E_{8}$-lattice. It is shown, by Venkov, de la Harpe, and Pache, that $τ(m)=0$ is equivalent to the fact that the shell of norm $2m$ of the $E_{8}$-lattice is an 8-design. So, Lehmer&#39;s conjecture is reformulated in terms of spherical $t$-design. Lehmer&#39;s conjecture is difficult to prove, and still remains open. In this paper, we consider toy models of Lehmer&#39;s conjecture. Namely, we show that the $m$-th Fourier coefficient of the weighted theta series of the $\mathbb{Z}^2$-lattice and the $A_{2}$-lattice does not vanish, when the shell of norm $m$ of those lattices is not the empty set. In other words, the spherical 5 (resp. 7)-design does not exist among the shells in the $\mathbb{Z}^2$-lattice (resp. $A_{2}$-lattice).

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.