Researcher profile

Doug Pickrell

Doug Pickrell contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Loops in SU(2) and Factorization, II

In the prequel to this paper, we proved that for a $SU(2,\mathbb C)$ valued loop having the critical degree of smoothness (one half of a derivative in the $L^2$ Sobolev sense), the following statements are equivalent: (1) the Toeplitz and shifted Toeplitz operators associated to the loop are invertible, (2) the loop has a unique triangular factorization, and (3) the loop has a unique root subgroup factorization. This hinges on some Plancherel-esque formulas for determinants of Toeplitz operators. The main point of this report is is to outline a generalization of this result to loops of vanishing mean oscillation, and to discuss some consequences. This generalization hinges on an operator-theoretic factorization of the Toeplitz operators (not simply their determinants).

preprint2020arXiv

The Exponential of the S^1 Trace of the Free Field and Verblunsky Coefficients

An identity of Szego, and a volume calculation, heuristically suggest a simple expression for the distribution of Verblunsky coefficients with respect to the (normalized) exponential of the $S^1$ trace of the Gaussian free field. This heuristic expression is not quite correct. A proof of the correct formula has been found by Chhaibi and Najnudel. Their proof uses random matrix theory and overcomes many difficult technical issues. In addition to presenting the Szego perspective, we show that the Chhaibi and Najnudel theorem implies a family of combinatorial identities (for moments of measures) which are of intrinsic interest.

preprint2019arXiv

Homeomorphism of S^1 and Factorization

For each $n > 0$ there is a one complex parameter family of homeomorphisms of the circle consisting of linear fractional transformations `conjugated by $z \to z^n$'. We show that these families are free of relations, which determines the structure of `the group of homeomorphisms of finite type'. We also discuss a number of questions regarding factorization for more robust groups of homeomorphisms of the circle in terms of these basic building blocks, and the correspondence between smoothness properties of the homeomorphisms and decay properties of the parameters.

preprint2018arXiv

Sobolev Maps into Compact Lie Groups and Curvature

These are notes on seminal work of Freed, and subsequent developments, on the curvature properties of (Sobolev Lie) groups of maps from a Riemannian manifold into a compact Lie group. We are mainly interested in critical cases which are relevant to quantum field theory. For example Freed showed that, in a necessarily qualified sense, the quotient space $W^{1/2}(S^1,K)/K$ is a (positive constant) Einstein `manifold' with respect to the essentially unique PSU(1,1) invariant metric, where $W^{s}$ denotes maps of $L^2$ Sobolev order s. In a similarly qualified sense, and in addition making use of the Dixmier trace/Wodzicki residue, we show that for a Riemann surface Sigma, $W^1(Σ,K)/K$ is a (positive constant) Einstein `manifold' with respect to the essentially unique conformally invariant metric. As in the one dimensional case, invariance implies Einstein, but the sign of the Ricci curvature has to be computed. Because of the qualifications involved in these statements, in practice it is necessary to consider curvature for $W^s(Σ,K)$ for s above the critical exponent, and limits. The formula we obtain is surprisingly simple.