BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Dennis Olivetti

Dennis Olivetti contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingComputational ComplexityData Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
13works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

13 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Distributed $Δ$-Coloring Plays Hide-and-Seek

We prove several new tight distributed lower bounds for classic symmetry breaking graph problems. As a basic tool, we first provide a new insightful proof that any deterministic distributed algorithm that computes a $Δ$-coloring on $Δ$-regular trees requires $Ω(\log_Δn)$ rounds and any randomized algorithm requires $Ω(\log_Δ\log n)$ rounds. We prove this result by showing that a natural relaxation of the $Δ$-coloring problem is a fixed point in the round elimination framework. As a first application, we show that our $Δ$-coloring lower bound proof directly extends to arbdefective colorings. We exactly characterize which variants of the arbdefective coloring problem are "easy", and which of them instead are "hard". As a second application, which we see as our main contribution, we use the structure of the fixed point as a building block to prove lower bounds as a function of $Δ$ for a large class of distributed symmetry breaking problems. For example, we obtain a tight lower bound for the fundamental problem of computing a $(2,β)$-ruling set. This is an exponential improvement over the best existing lower bound for the problem, which was proven in [FOCS '20]. Our lower bound even applies to a much more general family of problems that allows for almost arbitrary combinations of natural constraints from coloring problems, orientation problems, and independent set problems, and provides a single unified proof for known and new lower bound results for these types of problems. Our lower bounds as a function of $Δ$ also imply lower bounds as a function of $n$. We obtain, for example, that maximal independent set, on trees, requires $Ω(\log n / \log \log n)$ rounds for deterministic algorithms, which is tight.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Distributed Edge Coloring in Time Polylogarithmic in $Δ$

We provide new deterministic algorithms for the edge coloring problem, which is one of the classic and highly studied distributed local symmetry breaking problems. As our main result, we show that a $(2Δ-1)$-edge coloring can be computed in time $\mathrm{poly}\logΔ+ O(\log^* n)$ in the LOCAL model. This improves a result of Balliu, Kuhn, and Olivetti [PODC '20], who gave an algorithm with a quasi-polylogarithmic dependency on $Δ$. We further show that in the CONGEST model, an $(8+\varepsilon)Δ$-edge coloring can be computed in $\mathrm{poly}\logΔ+ O(\log^* n)$ rounds. The best previous $O(Δ)$-edge coloring algorithm that can be implemented in the CONGEST model is by Barenboim and Elkin [PODC '11] and it computes a $2^{O(1/\varepsilon)}Δ$-edge coloring in time $O(Δ^\varepsilon + \log^* n)$ for any $\varepsilon\in(0,1]$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Distributed Lower Bounds for Ruling Sets

Given a graph $G = (V,E)$, an $(α, β)$-ruling set is a subset $S \subseteq V$ such that the distance between any two vertices in $S$ is at least $α$, and the distance between any vertex in $V$ and the closest vertex in $S$ is at most $β$. We present lower bounds for distributedly computing ruling sets. More precisely, for the problem of computing a $(2, β)$-ruling set in the LOCAL model, we show the following, where $n$ denotes the number of vertices, $Δ$ the maximum degree, and $c$ is some universal constant independent of $n$ and $Δ$. $\bullet$ Any deterministic algorithm requires $Ω\left(\min \left\{ \frac{\log Δ}{β\log \log Δ} , \log_Δn \right\} \right)$ rounds, for all $β\le c \cdot \min\left\{ \sqrt{\frac{\log Δ}{\log \log Δ}} , \log_Δn \right\}$. By optimizing $Δ$, this implies a deterministic lower bound of $Ω\left(\sqrt{\frac{\log n}{β\log \log n}}\right)$ for all $β\le c \sqrt[3]{\frac{\log n}{\log \log n}}$. $\bullet$ Any randomized algorithm requires $Ω\left(\min \left\{ \frac{\log Δ}{β\log \log Δ} , \log_Δ\log n \right\} \right)$ rounds, for all $β\le c \cdot \min\left\{ \sqrt{\frac{\log Δ}{\log \log Δ}} , \log_Δ\log n \right\}$. By optimizing $Δ$, this implies a randomized lower bound of $Ω\left(\sqrt{\frac{\log \log n}{β\log \log \log n}}\right)$ for all $β\le c \sqrt[3]{\frac{\log \log n}{\log \log \log n}}$. For $β> 1$, this improves on the previously best lower bound of $Ω(\log^* n)$ rounds that follows from the 30-year-old bounds of Linial [FOCS'87] and Naor [J.Disc.Math.'91]. For $β= 1$, i.e., for the problem of computing a maximal independent set, our results improve on the previously best lower bound of $Ω(\log^* n)$ on trees, as our bounds already hold on trees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Efficient Classification of Locally Checkable Problems in Regular Trees

We give practical, efficient algorithms that automatically determine the asymptotic distributed round complexity of a given locally checkable graph problem in the $[Θ(\log n), Θ(n)]$ region, in two settings. We present one algorithm for unrooted regular trees and another algorithm for rooted regular trees. The algorithms take the description of a locally checkable labeling problem as input, and the running time is polynomial in the size of the problem description. The algorithms decide if the problem is solvable in $O(\log n)$ rounds. If not, it is known that the complexity has to be $Θ(n^{1/k})$ for some $k = 1, 2, \dotsc$, and in this case the algorithms also output the right value of the exponent $k$. In rooted trees in the $O(\log n)$ case we can then further determine the exact complexity class by using algorithms from prior work; for unrooted trees the more fine-grained classification in the $O(\log n)$ region remains an open question.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Exponential Speedup Over Locality in MPC with Optimal Memory

Locally Checkable Labeling (LCL) problems are graph problems in which a solution is correct if it satisfies some given constraints in the local neighborhood of each node. Example problems in this class include maximal matching, maximal independent set, and coloring problems. A successful line of research has been studying the complexities of LCL problems on paths/cycles, trees, and general graphs, providing many interesting results for the LOCAL model of distributed computing. In this work, we initiate the study of LCL problems in the low-space Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) model. In particular, on forests, we provide a method that, given the complexity of an LCL problem in the LOCAL model, automatically provides an exponentially faster algorithm for the low-space MPC setting that uses optimal global memory, that is, truly linear. While restricting to forests may seem to weaken the result, we emphasize that all known (conditional) lower bounds for the MPC setting are obtained by lifting lower bounds obtained in the distributed setting in tree-like networks (either forests or high girth graphs), and hence the problems that we study are challenging already on forests. Moreover, the most important technical feature of our algorithms is that they use optimal global memory, that is, memory linear in the number of edges of the graph. In contrast, most of the state-of-the-art algorithms use more than linear global memory. Further, they typically start with a dense graph, sparsify it, and then solve the problem on the residual graph, exploiting the relative increase in global memory. On forests, this is not possible, because the given graph is already as sparse as it can be, and using optimal memory requires new solutions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Locally Checkable Problems in Rooted Trees

Consider any locally checkable labeling problem $Π$ in rooted regular trees: there is a finite set of labels $Σ$, and for each label $x \in Σ$ we specify what are permitted label combinations of the children for an internal node of label $x$ (the leaf nodes are unconstrained). This formalism is expressive enough to capture many classic problems studied in distributed computing, including vertex coloring, edge coloring, and maximal independent set. We show that the distributed computational complexity of any such problem $Π$ falls in one of the following classes: it is $O(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $n^{Θ(1)}$ rounds in trees with $n$ nodes (and all of these classes are nonempty). We show that the complexity of any given problem is the same in all four standard models of distributed graph algorithms: deterministic $\mathsf{LOCAL}$, randomized $\mathsf{LOCAL}$, deterministic $\mathsf{CONGEST}$, and randomized $\mathsf{CONGEST}$ model. In particular, we show that randomness does not help in this setting, and the complexity class $Θ(\log \log n)$ does not exist (while it does exist in the broader setting of general trees). We also show how to systematically determine the complexity class of any such problem $Π$, i.e., whether $Π$ takes $O(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $n^{Θ(1)}$ rounds. While the algorithm may take exponential time in the size of the description of $Π$, it is nevertheless practical: we provide a freely available implementation of the classifier algorithm, and it is fast enough to classify many problems of interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Node and Edge Averaged Complexities of Local Graph Problems

The node-averaged complexity of a distributed algorithm running on a graph $G=(V,E)$ is the average over the times at which the nodes $V$ of $G$ finish their computation and commit to their outputs. We study the node-averaged complexity for some distributed symmetry breaking problems and provide the following results (among others): - The randomized node-averaged complexity of computing a maximal independent set (MIS) in $n$-node graphs of maximum degree $Δ$ is at least $Ω\big(\min\big\{\frac{\logΔ}{\log\logΔ},\sqrt{\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}}\big\}\big)$. This bound is obtained by a novel adaptation of the well-known KMW lower bound [JACM'16]. As a side result, we obtain the same lower bound for the worst-case randomized round complexity for computing an MIS in trees -- this essentially answers open problem 11.15 in the book of Barenboim and Elkin and resolves the complexity of MIS on trees up to an $O(\sqrt{\log\log n})$ factor. We also show that, $(2,2)$-ruling sets, which are a minimal relaxation of MIS, have $O(1)$ randomized node-averaged complexity. - For maximal matching, we show that while the randomized node-averaged complexity is $Ω\big(\min\big\{\frac{\logΔ}{\log\logΔ},\sqrt{\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}}\big\}\big)$, the randomized edge-averaged complexity is $O(1)$. Further, we show that the deterministic edge-averaged complexity of maximal matching is $O(\log^2Δ+ \log^* n)$ and the deterministic node-averaged complexity of maximal matching is $O(\log^3Δ+ \log^* n)$. - Finally, we consider the problem of computing a sinkless orientation of a graph. The deterministic worst-case complexity of the problem is known to be $Θ(\log n)$, even on bounded-degree graphs. We show that the problem can be solved deterministically with node-averaged complexity $O(\log^* n)$, while keeping the worst-case complexity in $O(\log n)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Sinkless Orientation Made Simple

The sinkless orientation problem plays a key role in understanding the foundations of distributed computing. The problem can be used to separate two fundamental models of distributed graph algorithms, LOCAL and SLOCAL: the locality of sinkless orientation is $Ω(\log n)$ in the deterministic LOCAL model and $O(\log \log n)$ in the deterministic SLOCAL model. Both of these results are known by prior work, but here we give new simple, self-contained proofs for them.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Almost Global Problems in the LOCAL Model

The landscape of the distributed time complexity is nowadays well-understood for subpolynomial complexities. When we look at deterministic algorithms in the LOCAL model and locally checkable problems (LCLs) in bounded-degree graphs, the following picture emerges: - There are lots of problems with time complexities of $Θ(\log^* n)$ or $Θ(\log n)$. - It is not possible to have a problem with complexity between $ω(\log^* n)$ and $o(\log n)$. - In general graphs, we can construct LCL problems with infinitely many complexities between $ω(\log n)$ and $n^{o(1)}$. - In trees, problems with such complexities do not exist. However, the high end of the complexity spectrum was left open by prior work. In general graphs there are LCL problems with complexities of the form $Θ(n^α)$ for any rational $0 < α\le 1/2$, while for trees only complexities of the form $Θ(n^{1/k})$ are known. No LCL problem with complexity between $ω(\sqrt{n})$ and $o(n)$ is known, and neither are there results that would show that such problems do not exist. We show that: - In general graphs, we can construct LCL problems with infinitely many complexities between $ω(\sqrt{n})$ and $o(n)$. - In trees, problems with such complexities do not exist. Put otherwise, we show that any LCL with a complexity $o(n)$ can be solved in time $O(\sqrt{n})$ in trees, while the same is not true in general graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Classification of distributed binary labeling problems

We present a complete classification of the deterministic distributed time complexity for a family of graph problems: binary labeling problems in trees. These are locally checkable problems that can be encoded with an alphabet of size two in the edge labeling formalism. Examples of binary labeling problems include sinkless orientation, sinkless and sourceless orientation, 2-vertex coloring, perfect matching, and the task of coloring edges red and blue such that all nodes are incident to at least one red and at least one blue edge. More generally, we can encode e.g. any cardinality constraints on indegrees and outdegrees. We study the deterministic time complexity of solving a given binary labeling problem in trees, in the usual LOCAL model of distributed computing. We show that the complexity of any such problem is in one of the following classes: $O(1)$, $Θ(\log n)$, $Θ(n)$, or unsolvable. In particular, a problem that can be represented in the binary labeling formalism cannot have time complexity $Θ(\log^* n)$, and hence we know that e.g. any encoding of maximal matchings has to use at least three labels (which is tight). Furthermore, given the description of any binary labeling problem, we can easily determine in which of the four classes it is and what is an asymptotically optimal algorithm for solving it. Hence the distributed time complexity of binary labeling problems is decidable, not only in principle, but also in practice: there is a simple and efficient algorithm that takes the description of a binary labeling problem and outputs its distributed time complexity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Distributed Edge Coloring in Time Quasi-Polylogarithmic in Delta

The problem of coloring the edges of an $n$-node graph of maximum degree $Δ$ with $2Δ- 1$ colors is one of the key symmetry breaking problems in the area of distributed graph algorithms. While there has been a lot of progress towards the understanding of this problem, the dependency of the running time on $Δ$ has been a long-standing open question. Very recently, Kuhn [SODA &#39;20] showed that the problem can be solved in time $2^{O(\sqrt{\logΔ})}+O(\log^* n)$. In this paper, we study the edge coloring problem in the distributed LOCAL model. We show that the $(\mathit{degree}+1)$-list edge coloring problem, and thus also the $(2Δ-1)$-edge coloring problem, can be solved deterministically in time $\log^{O(\log\logΔ)}Δ+ O(\log^* n)$. This is a significant improvement over the result of Kuhn [SODA &#39;20].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

How much does randomness help with locally checkable problems?

Locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) are distributed graph problems in which a solution is globally feasible if it is locally feasible in all constant-radius neighborhoods. Vertex colorings, maximal independent sets, and maximal matchings are examples of LCLs. On the one hand, it is known that some LCLs benefit exponentially from randomness---for example, any deterministic distributed algorithm that finds a sinkless orientation requires $Θ(\log n)$ rounds in the LOCAL model, while the randomized complexity of the problem is $Θ(\log \log n)$ rounds. On the other hand, there are also many LCLs in which randomness is useless. Previously, it was not known if there are any LCLs that benefit from randomness, but only subexponentially. We show that such problems exist: for example, there is an LCL with deterministic complexity $Θ(\log^2 n)$ rounds and randomized complexity $Θ(\log n \log \log n)$ rounds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Truly Tight-in-$Δ$ Bounds for Bipartite Maximal Matching and Variants

In a recent breakthrough result, Balliu et al. [FOCS&#39;19] proved a deterministic $Ω(\min(Δ,\log n /\log \log n))$-round and a randomized $Ω(\min(Δ,\log \log n/\log \log \log n))$-round lower bound for the complexity of the bipartite maximal matching problem on $n$-node graphs in the LOCAL model of distributed computing. Both lower bounds are asymptotically tight as a function of the maximum degree $Δ$. We provide truly tight bounds in $Δ$ for the complexity of bipartite maximal matching and many natural variants, up to and including the additive constant. As a by-product, our results yield a considerably simplified version of the proof by Balliu et al. We show that our results can be obtained via bounded automatic round elimination, a version of the recent automatic round elimination technique by Brandt [PODC&#39;19] that is particularly suited for automatization from a practical perspective. In this context, our work can be seen as another step towards the automatization of lower bounds in the LOCAL model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access