Paper detail

Node and Edge Averaged Complexities of Local Graph Problems

The node-averaged complexity of a distributed algorithm running on a graph $G=(V,E)$ is the average over the times at which the nodes $V$ of $G$ finish their computation and commit to their outputs. We study the node-averaged complexity for some distributed symmetry breaking problems and provide the following results (among others): - The randomized node-averaged complexity of computing a maximal independent set (MIS) in $n$-node graphs of maximum degree $Δ$ is at least $Ω\big(\min\big\{\frac{\logΔ}{\log\logΔ},\sqrt{\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}}\big\}\big)$. This bound is obtained by a novel adaptation of the well-known KMW lower bound [JACM'16]. As a side result, we obtain the same lower bound for the worst-case randomized round complexity for computing an MIS in trees -- this essentially answers open problem 11.15 in the book of Barenboim and Elkin and resolves the complexity of MIS on trees up to an $O(\sqrt{\log\log n})$ factor. We also show that, $(2,2)$-ruling sets, which are a minimal relaxation of MIS, have $O(1)$ randomized node-averaged complexity. - For maximal matching, we show that while the randomized node-averaged complexity is $Ω\big(\min\big\{\frac{\logΔ}{\log\logΔ},\sqrt{\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}}\big\}\big)$, the randomized edge-averaged complexity is $O(1)$. Further, we show that the deterministic edge-averaged complexity of maximal matching is $O(\log^2Δ+ \log^* n)$ and the deterministic node-averaged complexity of maximal matching is $O(\log^3Δ+ \log^* n)$. - Finally, we consider the problem of computing a sinkless orientation of a graph. The deterministic worst-case complexity of the problem is known to be $Θ(\log n)$, even on bounded-degree graphs. We show that the problem can be solved deterministically with node-averaged complexity $O(\log^* n)$, while keeping the worst-case complexity in $O(\log n)$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.