BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Jukka Suomela

Jukka Suomela appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingData Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityDiscrete MathematicsLogic in Computer Science

Catalog footprint

What is connected

32works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

32 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Efficient Classification of Locally Checkable Problems in Regular Trees

We give practical, efficient algorithms that automatically determine the asymptotic distributed round complexity of a given locally checkable graph problem in the $[Θ(\log n), Θ(n)]$ region, in two settings. We present one algorithm for unrooted regular trees and another algorithm for rooted regular trees. The algorithms take the description of a locally checkable labeling problem as input, and the running time is polynomial in the size of the problem description. The algorithms decide if the problem is solvable in $O(\log n)$ rounds. If not, it is known that the complexity has to be $Θ(n^{1/k})$ for some $k = 1, 2, \dotsc$, and in this case the algorithms also output the right value of the exponent $k$. In rooted trees in the $O(\log n)$ case we can then further determine the exact complexity class by using algorithms from prior work; for unrooted trees the more fine-grained classification in the $O(\log n)$ region remains an open question.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Locally Checkable Problems in Rooted Trees

Consider any locally checkable labeling problem $Π$ in rooted regular trees: there is a finite set of labels $Σ$, and for each label $x \in Σ$ we specify what are permitted label combinations of the children for an internal node of label $x$ (the leaf nodes are unconstrained). This formalism is expressive enough to capture many classic problems studied in distributed computing, including vertex coloring, edge coloring, and maximal independent set. We show that the distributed computational complexity of any such problem $Π$ falls in one of the following classes: it is $O(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $n^{Θ(1)}$ rounds in trees with $n$ nodes (and all of these classes are nonempty). We show that the complexity of any given problem is the same in all four standard models of distributed graph algorithms: deterministic $\mathsf{LOCAL}$, randomized $\mathsf{LOCAL}$, deterministic $\mathsf{CONGEST}$, and randomized $\mathsf{CONGEST}$ model. In particular, we show that randomness does not help in this setting, and the complexity class $Θ(\log \log n)$ does not exist (while it does exist in the broader setting of general trees). We also show how to systematically determine the complexity class of any such problem $Π$, i.e., whether $Π$ takes $O(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $n^{Θ(1)}$ rounds. While the algorithm may take exponential time in the size of the description of $Π$, it is nevertheless practical: we provide a freely available implementation of the classifier algorithm, and it is fast enough to classify many problems of interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Mending Partial Solutions with Few Changes

In this paper, we study the notion of mending, i.e. given a partial solution to a graph problem, we investigate how much effort is needed to turn it into a proper solution. For example, if we have a partial coloring of a graph, how hard is it to turn it into a proper coloring? In prior work (SIROCCO 2022), this question was formalized and studied from the perspective of mending radius: if there is a hole that we need to patch, how far do we need to modify the solution? In this work, we investigate a complementary notion of mending volume: how many nodes need to be modified to patch a hole? We focus on the case of locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) in trees, and show that already in this setting there are two infinite hierarchies of problems: for infinitely many values $0 < α\le 1$, there is an LCL problem with mending volume $Θ(n^α)$, and for infinitely many values $k \ge 1$, there is an LCL problem with mending volume $Θ(\log^k n)$. Hence the mendability of LCL problems on trees is a much more fine-grained question than what one would expect based on the mending radius alone. We define three variants of the theme: (1) existential mending volume, i.e., how many nodes need to be modified, (2) expected mending volume, i.e., how many nodes we need to explore to find a patch if we use randomness, and (3) deterministic mending volume, i.e., how many nodes we need to explore if we use a deterministic algorithm. We show that all three notions are distinct from each other, and we analyze the landscape of the complexities of LCL problems for the respective models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Sinkless Orientation Made Simple

The sinkless orientation problem plays a key role in understanding the foundations of distributed computing. The problem can be used to separate two fundamental models of distributed graph algorithms, LOCAL and SLOCAL: the locality of sinkless orientation is $Ω(\log n)$ in the deterministic LOCAL model and $O(\log \log n)$ in the deterministic SLOCAL model. Both of these results are known by prior work, but here we give new simple, self-contained proofs for them.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Sparse Matrix Multiplication in the Low-Bandwidth Model

We study matrix multiplication in the low-bandwidth model: There are $n$ computers, and we need to compute the product of two $n \times n$ matrices. Initially computer $i$ knows row $i$ of each input matrix. In one communication round each computer can send and receive one $O(\log n)$-bit message. Eventually computer $i$ has to output row $i$ of the product matrix. We seek to understand the complexity of this problem in the uniformly sparse case: each row and column of each input matrix has at most $d$ non-zeros and in the product matrix we only need to know the values of at most $d$ elements in each row or column. This is exactly the setting that we have, e.g., when we apply matrix multiplication for triangle detection in graphs of maximum degree $d$. We focus on the supported setting: the structure of the matrices is known in advance; only the numerical values of nonzero elements are unknown. There is a trivial algorithm that solves the problem in $O(d^2)$ rounds, but for a large $d$, better algorithms are known to exist; in the moderately dense regime the problem can be solved in $O(dn^{1/3})$ communication rounds, and for very large $d$, the dominant solution is the fast matrix multiplication algorithm using $O(n^{1.158})$ communication rounds (for matrix multiplication over fields and rings supporting fast matrix multiplication). In this work we show that it is possible to overcome quadratic barrier for all values of $d$: we present an algorithm that solves the problem in $O(d^{1.907})$ rounds for fields and rings supporting fast matrix multiplication and $O(d^{1.927})$ rounds for semirings, independent of $n$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Efficient Load-Balancing through Distributed Token Dropping

We introduce a new graph problem, the token dropping game, and we show how to solve it efficiently in a distributed setting. We use the token dropping game as a tool to design an efficient distributed algorithm for stable orientations and more generally for locally optimal semi-matchings. The prior work by Czygrinow et al. (DISC 2012) finds a stable orientation in $O(Δ^5)$ rounds in graphs of maximum degree $Δ$, while we improve it to $O(Δ^4)$ and also prove a lower bound of $Ω(Δ)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Almost Global Problems in the LOCAL Model

The landscape of the distributed time complexity is nowadays well-understood for subpolynomial complexities. When we look at deterministic algorithms in the LOCAL model and locally checkable problems (LCLs) in bounded-degree graphs, the following picture emerges: - There are lots of problems with time complexities of $Θ(\log^* n)$ or $Θ(\log n)$. - It is not possible to have a problem with complexity between $ω(\log^* n)$ and $o(\log n)$. - In general graphs, we can construct LCL problems with infinitely many complexities between $ω(\log n)$ and $n^{o(1)}$. - In trees, problems with such complexities do not exist. However, the high end of the complexity spectrum was left open by prior work. In general graphs there are LCL problems with complexities of the form $Θ(n^α)$ for any rational $0 < α\le 1/2$, while for trees only complexities of the form $Θ(n^{1/k})$ are known. No LCL problem with complexity between $ω(\sqrt{n})$ and $o(n)$ is known, and neither are there results that would show that such problems do not exist. We show that: - In general graphs, we can construct LCL problems with infinitely many complexities between $ω(\sqrt{n})$ and $o(n)$. - In trees, problems with such complexities do not exist. Put otherwise, we show that any LCL with a complexity $o(n)$ can be solved in time $O(\sqrt{n})$ in trees, while the same is not true in general graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Classification of distributed binary labeling problems

We present a complete classification of the deterministic distributed time complexity for a family of graph problems: binary labeling problems in trees. These are locally checkable problems that can be encoded with an alphabet of size two in the edge labeling formalism. Examples of binary labeling problems include sinkless orientation, sinkless and sourceless orientation, 2-vertex coloring, perfect matching, and the task of coloring edges red and blue such that all nodes are incident to at least one red and at least one blue edge. More generally, we can encode e.g. any cardinality constraints on indegrees and outdegrees. We study the deterministic time complexity of solving a given binary labeling problem in trees, in the usual LOCAL model of distributed computing. We show that the complexity of any such problem is in one of the following classes: $O(1)$, $Θ(\log n)$, $Θ(n)$, or unsolvable. In particular, a problem that can be represented in the binary labeling formalism cannot have time complexity $Θ(\log^* n)$, and hence we know that e.g. any encoding of maximal matchings has to use at least three labels (which is tight). Furthermore, given the description of any binary labeling problem, we can easily determine in which of the four classes it is and what is an asymptotically optimal algorithm for solving it. Hence the distributed time complexity of binary labeling problems is decidable, not only in principle, but also in practice: there is a simple and efficient algorithm that takes the description of a binary labeling problem and outputs its distributed time complexity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

How much does randomness help with locally checkable problems?

Locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) are distributed graph problems in which a solution is globally feasible if it is locally feasible in all constant-radius neighborhoods. Vertex colorings, maximal independent sets, and maximal matchings are examples of LCLs. On the one hand, it is known that some LCLs benefit exponentially from randomness---for example, any deterministic distributed algorithm that finds a sinkless orientation requires $Θ(\log n)$ rounds in the LOCAL model, while the randomized complexity of the problem is $Θ(\log \log n)$ rounds. On the other hand, there are also many LCLs in which randomness is useless. Previously, it was not known if there are any LCLs that benefit from randomness, but only subexponentially. We show that such problems exist: for example, there is an LCL with deterministic complexity $Θ(\log^2 n)$ rounds and randomized complexity $Θ(\log n \log \log n)$ rounds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Seeing Far vs. Seeing Wide: Volume Complexity of Local Graph Problems

Consider a graph problem that is locally checkable but not locally solvable: given a solution we can check that it is feasible by verifying all constant-radius neighborhoods, but to find a solution each node needs to explore the input graph at least up to distance $Ω(\log n)$ in order to produce its output. We consider the complexity of such problems from the perspective of volume: how large a subgraph does a node need to see in order to produce its output. We study locally checkable graph problems on bounded-degree graphs. We give a number of constructions that exhibit tradeoffs between deterministic distance, randomized distance, deterministic volume, and randomized volume: - If the deterministic distance is linear, it is also known that randomized distance is near-linear. In contrast, we show that there are problems with linear deterministic volume but only logarithmic randomized volume. - We prove a volume hierarchy theorem for randomized complexity: among problems with linear deterministic volume complexity, there are infinitely many distinct randomized volume complexity classes between $Ω(\log n)$ and $O(n)$. This hierarchy persists even when restricting to problems whose randomized and deterministic distance complexities are $Θ(\log n)$. - Similar hierarchies exist for polynomial distance complexities: for any $k, \ell \in N$ with $k \leq \ell$, there are problems whose randomized and deterministic distance complexities are $Θ(n^{1/\ell})$, randomized volume complexities are $Θ(n^{1/k})$, and whose deterministic volume complexities are $Θ(n)$. Additionally, we consider connections between our volume model and massively parallel computation (MPC). We give a general simulation argument that any volume-efficient algorithm can be transformed into a space-efficient MPC algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Randomized algorithms for finding a majority element

Given $n$ colored balls, we want to detect if more than $\lfloor n/2\rfloor$ of them have the same color, and if so find one ball with such majority color. We are only allowed to choose two balls and compare their colors, and the goal is to minimize the total number of such operations. A well-known exercise is to show how to find such a ball with only $2n$ comparisons while using only a logarithmic number of bits for bookkeeping. The resulting algorithm is called the Boyer--Moore majority vote algorithm. It is known that any deterministic method needs $\lceil 3n/2\rceil-2$ comparisons in the worst case, and this is tight. However, it is not clear what is the required number of comparisons if we allow randomization. We construct a randomized algorithm which always correctly finds a ball of the majority color (or detects that there is none) using, with high probability, only $7n/6+o(n)$ comparisons. We also prove that the expected number of comparisons used by any such randomized method is at least $1.019n$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The Minimum Backlog Problem

We study the minimum backlog problem (MBP). This online problem arises, e.g., in the context of sensor networks. We focus on two main variants of MBP. The discrete MBP is a 2-person game played on a graph $G=(V,E)$. The player is initially located at a vertex of the graph. In each time step, the adversary pours a total of one unit of water into cups that are located on the vertices of the graph, arbitrarily distributing the water among the cups. The player then moves from her current vertex to an adjacent vertex and empties the cup at that vertex. The player's objective is to minimize the backlog, i.e., the maximum amount of water in any cup at any time. The geometric MBP is a continuous-time version of the MBP: the cups are points in the two-dimensional plane, the adversary pours water continuously at a constant rate, and the player moves in the plane with unit speed. Again, the player's objective is to minimize the backlog. We show that the competitive ratio of any algorithm for the MBP has a lower bound of $Ω(D)$, where $D$ is the diameter of the graph (for the discrete MBP) or the diameter of the point set (for the geometric MBP). Therefore we focus on determining a strategy for the player that guarantees a uniform upper bound on the absolute value of the backlog. For the absolute value of the backlog there is a trivial lower bound of $Ω(D)$, and the deamortization analysis of Dietz and Sleator gives an upper bound of $O(D\log N)$ for $N$ cups. Our main result is a tight upper bound for the geometric MBP: we show that there is a strategy for the player that guarantees a backlog of $O(D)$, independently of the number of cups.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Lower Bound for the Distributed Lovász Local Lemma

We show that any randomised Monte Carlo distributed algorithm for the Lovász local lemma requires $Ω(\log \log n)$ communication rounds, assuming that it finds a correct assignment with high probability. Our result holds even in the special case of $d = O(1)$, where $d$ is the maximum degree of the dependency graph. By prior work, there are distributed algorithms for the Lovász local lemma with a running time of $O(\log n)$ rounds in bounded-degree graphs, and the best lower bound before our work was $Ω(\log^* n)$ rounds [Chung et al. 2014].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Algebrisation in Distributed Graph Algorithms: Fast Matrix Multiplication in the Congested Clique

While algebrisation constitutes a powerful technique in the design and analysis of centralised algorithms, to date there have been hardly any applications of algebraic techniques in the context of distributed graph algorithms. This work is a case study that demonstrates the potential of algebrisation in the distributed context. We will focus on distributed graph algorithms in the congested clique model; the graph problems that we will consider include, e.g., the triangle detection problem and the all-pairs shortest path problem (APSP). There is plenty of prior work on combinatorial algorithms in the congested clique model: for example, Dolev et al. (DISC 2012) gave an algorithm for triangle detection with a running time of $\tilde O(n^{1/3})$, and Nanongkai (STOC 2014) gave an approximation algorithm for APSP with a running time of $\tilde O(n^{1/2})$. In this work, we will use algebraic techniques -- in particular, algorithms based on fast matrix multiplication -- to solve both triangle detection and the unweighted APSP in time $O(n^{0.15715})$; for weighted APSP, we give a $(1+o(1))$-approximation with this running time, as well as an exact $\tilde O(n^{1/3})$ solution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Exact bounds for distributed graph colouring

We prove exact bounds on the time complexity of distributed graph colouring. If we are given a directed path that is properly coloured with $n$ colours, by prior work it is known that we can find a proper 3-colouring in $\frac{1}{2} \log^*(n) \pm O(1)$ communication rounds. We close the gap between upper and lower bounds: we show that for infinitely many $n$ the time complexity is precisely $\frac{1}{2} \log^* n$ communication rounds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Improved Approximation Algorithms for Relay Placement

In the relay placement problem the input is a set of sensors and a number $r \ge 1$, the communication range of a relay. In the one-tier version of the problem the objective is to place a minimum number of relays so that between every pair of sensors there is a path through sensors and/or relays such that the consecutive vertices of the path are within distance $r$ if both vertices are relays and within distance 1 otherwise. The two-tier version adds the restrictions that the path must go through relays, and not through sensors. We present a 3.11-approximation algorithm for the one-tier version and a PTAS for the two-tier version. We also show that the one-tier version admits no PTAS, assuming P $\ne$ NP.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Locally Optimal Load Balancing

This work studies distributed algorithms for locally optimal load-balancing: We are given a graph of maximum degree $Δ$, and each node has up to $L$ units of load. The task is to distribute the load more evenly so that the loads of adjacent nodes differ by at most $1$. If the graph is a path ($Δ= 2$), it is easy to solve the fractional version of the problem in $O(L)$ communication rounds, independently of the number of nodes. We show that this is tight, and we show that it is possible to solve also the discrete version of the problem in $O(L)$ rounds in paths. For the general case ($Δ> 2$), we show that fractional load balancing can be solved in $\operatorname{poly}(L,Δ)$ rounds and discrete load balancing in $f(L,Δ)$ rounds for some function $f$, independently of the number of nodes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Non-Local Probes Do Not Help with Graph Problems

This work bridges the gap between distributed and centralised models of computing in the context of sublinear-time graph algorithms. A priori, typical centralised models of computing (e.g., parallel decision trees or centralised local algorithms) seem to be much more powerful than distributed message-passing algorithms: centralised algorithms can directly probe any part of the input, while in distributed algorithms nodes can only communicate with their immediate neighbours. We show that for a large class of graph problems, this extra freedom does not help centralised algorithms at all: for example, efficient stateless deterministic centralised local algorithms can be simulated with efficient distributed message-passing algorithms. In particular, this enables us to transfer existing lower bound results from distributed algorithms to centralised local algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Towards Optimal Synchronous Counting

Consider a complete communication network of $n$ nodes, where the nodes receive a common clock pulse. We study the synchronous $c$-counting problem: given any starting state and up to $f$ faulty nodes with arbitrary behaviour, the task is to eventually have all correct nodes counting modulo $c$ in agreement. Thus, we are considering algorithms that are self-stabilizing despite Byzantine failures. In this work, we give new algorithms for the synchronous counting problem that (1) are deterministic, (2) have linear stabilisation time in $f$, (3) use a small number of states, and (4) achieve almost-optimal resilience. Prior algorithms either resort to randomisation, use a large number of states, or have poor resilience. In particular, we achieve an exponential improvement in the space complexity of deterministic algorithms, while still achieving linear stabilisation time and almost-linear resilience.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Large Cuts with Local Algorithms on Triangle-Free Graphs

We study the problem of finding large cuts in $d$-regular triangle-free graphs. In prior work, Shearer (1992) gives a randomised algorithm that finds a cut of expected size $(1/2 + 0.177/\sqrt{d})m$, where $m$ is the number of edges. We give a simpler algorithm that does much better: it finds a cut of expected size $(1/2 + 0.28125/\sqrt{d})m$. As a corollary, this shows that in any $d$-regular triangle-free graph there exists a cut of at least this size. Our algorithm can be interpreted as a very efficient randomised distributed algorithm: each node needs to produce only one random bit, and the algorithm runs in one synchronous communication round. This work is also a case study of applying computational techniques in the design of distributed algorithms: our algorithm was designed by a computer program that searched for optimal algorithms for small values of $d$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Median Filtering is Equivalent to Sorting

This work shows that the following problems are equivalent, both in theory and in practice: - median filtering: given an $n$-element vector, compute the sliding window median with window size $k$, - piecewise sorting: given an $n$-element vector, divide it in $n/k$ blocks of length $k$ and sort each block. By prior work, median filtering is known to be at least as hard as piecewise sorting: with a single median filter operation we can sort $Θ(n/k)$ blocks of length $Θ(k)$. The present work shows that median filtering is also as easy as piecewise sorting: we can do median filtering with one piecewise sorting operation and linear-time postprocessing. In particular, median filtering can directly benefit from the vast literature on sorting algorithms---for example, adaptive sorting algorithms imply adaptive median filtering algorithms. The reduction is very efficient in practice---for random inputs the performance of the new sorting-based algorithm is on a par with the fastest heap-based algorithms, and for benign data distributions it typically outperforms prior algorithms. The key technical idea is that we can represent the sliding window with a pair of sorted doubly-linked lists: we delete items from one list and add items to the other list. Deletions are easy; additions can be done efficiently if we reverse the time twice: First we construct the full list and delete the items in the reverse order. Then we undo each deletion with Knuth's dancing links technique.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Weak Models of Distributed Computing, with Connections to Modal Logic

This work presents a classification of weak models of distributed computing. We focus on deterministic distributed algorithms, and study models of computing that are weaker versions of the widely-studied port-numbering model. In the port-numbering model, a node of degree d receives messages through d input ports and sends messages through d output ports, both numbered with 1,2,...,d. In this work, VVc is the class of all graph problems that can be solved in the standard port-numbering model. We study the following subclasses of VVc: VV: Input port i and output port i are not necessarily connected to the same neighbour. MV: Input ports are not numbered; algorithms receive a multiset of messages. SV: Input ports are not numbered; algorithms receive a set of messages. VB: Output ports are not numbered; algorithms send the same message to all output ports. MB: Combination of MV and VB. SB: Combination of SV and VB. Now we have many trivial containment relations, such as SB \subseteq MB \subseteq VB \subseteq VV \subseteq VVc, but it is not obvious if, for example, either of VB \subseteq SV or SV \subseteq VB should hold. Nevertheless, it turns out that we can identify a linear order on these classes. We prove that SB \subsetneq MB = VB \subsetneq SV = MV = VV \subsetneq VVc. The same holds for the constant-time versions of these classes. We also show that the constant-time variants of these classes can be characterised by a corresponding modal logic. Hence the linear order identified in this work has direct implications in the study of the expressibility of modal logic. Conversely, one can use tools from modal logic to study these classes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

What can be decided locally without identifiers?

Do unique node identifiers help in deciding whether a network $G$ has a prescribed property $P$? We study this question in the context of distributed local decision, where the objective is to decide whether $G \in P$ by having each node run a constant-time distributed decision algorithm. If $G \in P$, all the nodes should output yes; if $G \notin P$, at least one node should output no. A recent work (Fraigniaud et al., OPODIS 2012) studied the role of identifiers in local decision and gave several conditions under which identifiers are not needed. In this article, we answer their original question. More than that, we do so under all combinations of the following two critical variations on the underlying model of distributed computing: ($B$): the size of the identifiers is bounded by a function of the size of the input network; as opposed to ($\neg B$): the identifiers are unbounded. ($C$): the nodes run a computable algorithm; as opposed to ($\neg C$): the nodes can compute any, possibly uncomputable function. While it is easy to see that under ($\neg B, \neg C$) identifiers are not needed, we show that under all other combinations there are properties that can be decided locally if and only if identifiers are present. Our constructions use ideas from classical computability theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Lower Bounds for Local Approximation

In the study of deterministic distributed algorithms it is commonly assumed that each node has a unique $O(\log n)$-bit identifier. We prove that for a general class of graph problems, local algorithms (constant-time distributed algorithms) do not need such identifiers: a port numbering and orientation is sufficient. Our result holds for so-called simple PO-checkable graph optimisation problems; this includes many classical packing and covering problems such as vertex covers, edge covers, matchings, independent sets, dominating sets, and edge dominating sets. We focus on the case of bounded-degree graphs and show that if a local algorithm finds a constant-factor approximation of a simple PO-checkable graph problem with the help of unique identifiers, then the same approximation ratio can be achieved on anonymous networks. As a corollary of our result and by prior work, we derive a tight lower bound on the local approximability of the minimum edge dominating set problem. Our main technical tool is an algebraic construction of homogeneously ordered graphs: We say that a graph is $(α,r)$-homogeneous if its nodes are linearly ordered so that an $α$ fraction of nodes have pairwise isomorphic radius-$r$ neighbourhoods. We show that there exists a finite $(α,r)$-homogeneous $2k$-regular graph of girth at least $g$ for any $α< 1$ and any $r$, $k$, and $g$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

No Sublogarithmic-time Approximation Scheme for Bipartite Vertex Cover

König's theorem states that on bipartite graphs the size of a maximum matching equals the size of a minimum vertex cover. It is known from prior work that for every ε> 0 there exists a constant-time distributed algorithm that finds a (1+ε)-approximation of a maximum matching on 2-coloured graphs of bounded degree. In this work, we show---somewhat surprisingly---that no sublogarithmic-time approximation scheme exists for the dual problem: there is a constant δ> 0 so that no randomised distributed algorithm with running time o(\log n) can find a (1+δ)-approximation of a minimum vertex cover on 2-coloured graphs of maximum degree 3. In fact, a simple application of the Linial--Saks (1993) decomposition demonstrates that this lower bound is tight. Our lower-bound construction is simple and, to some extent, independent of previous techniques. Along the way we prove that a certain cut minimisation problem, which might be of independent interest, is hard to approximate locally on expander graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Distributed Maximal Matching: Greedy is Optimal

We study distributed algorithms that find a maximal matching in an anonymous, edge-coloured graph. If the edges are properly coloured with $k$ colours, there is a trivial greedy algorithm that finds a maximal matching in $k-1$ synchronous communication rounds. The present work shows that the greedy algorithm is optimal in the general case: any algorithm that finds a maximal matching in anonymous, $k$-edge-coloured graphs requires $k-1$ rounds. If we focus on graphs of maximum degree $Δ$, it is known that a maximal matching can be found in $O(Δ+ \log^* k)$ rounds, and prior work implies a lower bound of $Ω(\polylog(Δ) + \log^* k)$ rounds. Our work closes the gap between upper and lower bounds: the complexity is $Θ(Δ+ \log^* k)$ rounds. To our knowledge, this is the first linear-in-$Δ$ lower bound for the distributed complexity of a classical graph problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Local algorithms in (weakly) coloured graphs

A local algorithm is a distributed algorithm that completes after a constant number of synchronous communication rounds. We present local approximation algorithms for the minimum dominating set problem and the maximum matching problem in 2-coloured and weakly 2-coloured graphs. In a weakly 2-coloured graph, both problems admit a local algorithm with the approximation factor $(Δ+1)/2$, where $Δ$ is the maximum degree of the graph. We also give a matching lower bound proving that there is no local algorithm with a better approximation factor for either of these problems. Furthermore, we show that the stronger assumption of a 2-colouring does not help in the case of the dominating set problem, but there is a local approximation scheme for the maximum matching problem in 2-coloured graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

Almost stable matchings in constant time

We show that the ratio of matched individuals to blocking pairs grows linearly with the number of propose--accept rounds executed by the Gale--Shapley algorithm for the stable marriage problem. Consequently, the participants can arrive at an almost stable matching even without full information about the problem instance; for each participant, knowing only its local neighbourhood is enough. In distributed-systems parlance, this means that if each person has only a constant number of acceptable partners, an almost stable matching emerges after a constant number of synchronous communication rounds. This holds even if ties are present in the preference lists. We apply our results to give a distributed $(2+ε)$-approximation algorithm for maximum-weight matching in bicoloured graphs and a centralised randomised constant-time approximation scheme for estimating the size of a stable matching.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

Tight local approximation results for max-min linear programs

In a bipartite max-min LP, we are given a bipartite graph $\myG = (V \cup I \cup K, E)$, where each agent $v \in V$ is adjacent to exactly one constraint $i \in I$ and exactly one objective $k \in K$. Each agent $v$ controls a variable $x_v$. For each $i \in I$ we have a nonnegative linear constraint on the variables of adjacent agents. For each $k \in K$ we have a nonnegative linear objective function of the variables of adjacent agents. The task is to maximise the minimum of the objective functions. We study local algorithms where each agent $v$ must choose $x_v$ based on input within its constant-radius neighbourhood in $\myG$. We show that for every $ε>0$ there exists a local algorithm achieving the approximation ratio ${Δ_I (1 - 1/Δ_K)} + ε$. We also show that this result is the best possible -- no local algorithm can achieve the approximation ratio ${Δ_I (1 - 1/Δ_K)}$. Here $Δ_I$ is the maximum degree of a vertex $i \in I$, and $Δ_K$ is the maximum degree of a vertex $k \in K$. As a methodological contribution, we introduce the technique of graph unfolding for the design of local approximation algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access