Researcher profile

Anita Liebenau

Anita Liebenau contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Asymptotic enumeration of hypergraphs by degree sequence

We prove an asymptotic formula for the number of $k$-uniform hypergraphs with a given degree sequence, for a wide range of parameters. In particular, we find a formula that is asymptotically equal to the number of $d$-regular $k$-uniform hypergraphs on $n$ vertices provided that $dn\le c\binom{n}{k}$ for a constant $c>0$, and $3 \leq k < n^C$ for any $C<1/9.$ Our results relate the degree sequence of a random $k$-uniform hypergraph to a simple model of nearly independent binomial random variables, thus extending the recent results for graphs due to the second and third author.

preprint2020arXiv

Asymptotic enumeration of digraphs and bipartite graphs by degree sequence

We provide asymptotic formulae for the numbers of bipartite graphs with given degree sequence, and of loopless digraphs with given in- and out-degree sequences, for a wide range of parameters. Our results cover medium range densities and close the gaps between the results known for the sparse and dense ranges. In the case of bipartite graphs, these results were proved by Greenhill, McKay and Wang in 2006 and by Canfield, Greenhill and McKay in 2008, respectively. Our method also essentially covers the sparse range, for which much less was known in the case of loopless digraphs. For the range of densities which our results cover, they imply that the degree sequence of a random bipartite graph with m edges is accurately modelled by a sequence of independent binomial random variables, conditional upon the sum of variables in each part being equal to m. A similar model also holds for loopless digraphs.

preprint2020arXiv

Most binary matrices have no small defining set

Consider a matrix $M$ chosen uniformly at random from a class of $m \times n$ matrices of zeros and ones with prescribed row and column sums. A partially filled matrix $D$ is a $\mathit{defining}$ $\mathit{set}$ for $M$ if $M$ is the unique member of its class that contains the entries in $D$. The $\mathit{size}$ of a defining set is the number of filled entries. A $\mathit{critical}$ $\mathit{set}$ is a defining set for which the removal of any entry stops it being a defining set. For some small fixed $ε>0$, we assume that $n\le m=o(n^{1+ε})$, and that $λ\le1/2$, where $λ$ is the proportion of entries of $M$ that equal $1$. We also assume that the row sums of $M$ do not vary by more than $\mathcal{O}(n^{1/2+ε})$, and that the column sums do not vary by more than $\mathcal{O}(m^{1/2+ε})$. Under these assumptions we show that $M$ almost surely has no defining set of size less than $λmn-\mathcal{O}(m^{7/4+ε})$. It follows that $M$ almost surely has no critical set of size more than $(1-λ)mn+\mathcal{O}(m^{7/4+ε})$. Our results generalise a theorem of Cavenagh and Ramadurai, who examined the case when $λ=1/2$ and $n=m=2^k$ for an integer $k$.

preprint2020arXiv

On minimal Ramsey graphs and Ramsey equivalence in multiple colours

For an integer $q\ge 2$, a graph $G$ is called $q$-Ramsey for a graph $H$ if every $q$-colouring of the edges of $G$ contains a monochromatic copy of $H$. If $G$ is $q$-Ramsey for $H$, yet no proper subgraph of $G$ has this property then $G$ is called $q$-Ramsey-minimal for $H$. Generalising a statement by Burr, Nešetřil and Rödl from 1977 we prove that, for $q\ge 3$, if $G$ is a graph that is not $q$-Ramsey for some graph $H$ then $G$ is contained as an induced subgraph in an infinite number of $q$-Ramsey-minimal graphs for $H$, as long as $H$ is $3$-connected or isomorphic to the triangle. For such $H$, the following are some consequences. (1) For $2\le r< q$, every $r$-Ramsey-minimal graph for $H$ is contained as an induced subgraph in an infinite number of $q$-Ramsey-minimal graphs for $H$. (2) For every $q\ge 3$, there are $q$-Ramsey-minimal graphs for $H$ of arbitrarily large maximum degree, genus, and chromatic number. (3) The collection $\{{\cal M}_q(H) : H \text{ is 3-connected or } K_3\}$ forms an antichain with respect to the subset relation, where ${\cal M}_q(H)$ denotes the set of all graphs that are $q$-Ramsey-minimal for $H$. We also address the question which pairs of graphs satisfy ${\cal M}_q(H_1)={\cal M}_q(H_2)$, in which case $H_1$ and $H_2$ are called $q$-equivalent. We show that two graphs $H_1$ and $H_2$ are $q$-equivalent for even $q$ if they are $2$-equivalent, and that in general $q$-equivalence for some $q\ge 3$ does not necessarily imply $2$-equivalence. Finally we indicate that for connected graphs this implication may hold: Results by Nešetřil and Rödl and by Fox, Grinshpun, Liebenau, Person and Szabó imply that the complete graph is not $2$-equivalent to any other connected graph. We prove that this is the case for an arbitrary number of colours.

preprint2020arXiv

The threshold bias of the clique-factor game

Let $r \ge 4$ be an integer and consider the following game on the complete graph $K_n$ for $n \in r \mathbb{Z}$: Two players, Maker and Breaker, alternately claim previously unclaimed edges of $K_n$ such that in each turn Maker claims one and Breaker claims $b \in \mathbb{N}$ edges. Maker wins if her graph contains a $K_r$-factor, that is a collection of $n/r$ vertex-disjoint copies of $K_r$, and Breaker wins otherwise. In other words, we consider a $b$-biased $K_r$-factor Maker-Breaker game. We show that the threshold bias for this game is of order $n^{2/(r+2)}$. This makes a step towards determining the threshold bias for making bounded-degree spanning graphs and extends a result of Allen et al.\ who resolved the case $r \in \{3,4\}$ up to a logarithmic factor.