Source author record

Deepak Rajendraprasad

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

27works
5topics
4close collaborators

Published work

27 publications

preprint2023arXiv

New bounds on the anti-Ramsey numbers of star graphs

The anti-Ramsey number ar(G,H)ar(G,H) with input graph GG and pattern graph HH, is the maximum positive integer kk such that there exists an edge coloring of GG using kk colors, in which there are no rainbow subgraphs isomorphic to HH in GG. (HH is rainbow if all its edges get distinct colors). The concept of anti-Ramsey number was introduced by Erdös, Simanovitz, and Sós in 1973. Thereafter several researchers investigated this concept in the combinatorial setting. Recently, Feng et al. revisited the anti-Ramsey problem for the pattern graph K1,tK_{1,t} (for t≥3t \geq 3) purely from an algorithmic point of view due to its applications in interference modeling of wireless networks. They posed it as an optimization problem, the maximum edge qq-coloring problem. For a graph GG and an integer q≥2q\geq 2, an edge qq-coloring of GG is an assignment of colors to edges of GG, such that edges incident on a vertex span at most qq distinct colors. The maximum edge qq-coloring problem seeks to maximize the number of colors in an edge qq-coloring of the graph GG. Note that the optimum value of the edge qq-coloring problem of GG equals ar(G,K1,q+1)ar(G,K_{1,q+1}). In this paper, we study ar(G,K1,t)ar(G,K_{1,t}), the anti-Ramsey number of stars, for each fixed integer t≥3t\geq 3, both from combinatorial and algorithmic point of view. The first of our main results presents an upper bound for ar(G,K1,q+1)ar(G,K_{1,q+1}), in terms of number of vertices and the minimum degree of GG. The second one improves this result for the case of triangle-free input graphs. For a positive integer tt, let HtH_t denote a subgraph of GG with maximum number of possible edges and maximum degree tt. Our third main result presents an upper bound for ar(G,K1,q+1)ar(G,K_{1,q+1}) in terms of ∣E(Hq−1)∣|E(H_{q-1})|. All our results have algorithmic consequences.

preprint2020arXiv

An Improvement to Chvátal and Thomassen's Upper Bound for Oriented Diameter

An orientation of an undirected graph GG is an assignment of exactly one direction to each edge of GG. The oriented diameter of a graph GG is the smallest diameter among all the orientations of GG. The maximum oriented diameter of a family of graphs F\mathscr{F} is the maximum oriented diameter among all the graphs in F\mathscr{F}. Chvátal and Thomassen [JCTB, 1978] gave a lower bound of 12d2+d\frac{1}{2}d^2+d and an upper bound of 2d2+2d2d^2+2d for the maximum oriented diameter of the family of 22-edge connected graphs of diameter dd. We improve this upper bound to 1.373d2+6.971d−1 1.373 d^2 + 6.971d-1 , which outperforms the former upper bound for all values of dd greater than or equal to 88. For the family of 22-edge connected graphs of diameter 33, Kwok, Liu and West [JCTB, 2010] obtained improved lower and upper bounds of 99 and 1111 respectively. For the family of 22-edge connected graphs of diameter 44, the bounds provided by Chvátal and Thomassen are 1212 and 4040 and no better bounds were known. By extending the method we used for diameter dd graphs, along with an asymmetric extension of a technique used by Chvátal and Thomassen, we have improved this upper bound to 2121.

preprint2020arXiv

Characterization and a 2D Visualization of B0_0-VPG Cocomparability Graphs

B0_0-VPG graphs are intersection graphs of vertical and horizontal line segments on a plane. Cohen, Golumbic, Trotter, and Wang [Order, 2016] pose the question of characterizing B0_0-VPG permutation graphs. We respond here by characterizing B0_0-VPG cocomparability graphs. This characterization also leads to a polynomial time recognition and B0_0-VPG drawing algorithm for the class. Our B0_0-VPG drawing algorithm starts by fixing any one of the many posets PP whose cocomparability graph is the input graph GG. The drawing we obtain not only visualizes GG in that one can distinguish comparable pairs from incomparable ones, but one can also identify which among a comparable pair is larger in PP from this visualization.

preprint2020arXiv

Dimension of CPT posets

A collection of linear orders on XX, say L\mathcal{L}, is said to \emph{realize} a partially ordered set (or poset) P=(X,⪯)\mathcal{P} = (X, \preceq) if, for any two distinct x,y∈Xx,y \in X, x⪯yx \preceq y if and only if x≺Lyx \prec_L y, ∀L∈L\forall L \in \mathcal{L}. We call L\mathcal{L} a \emph{realizer} of P\mathcal{P}. The \emph{dimension} of P\mathcal{P}, denoted by dim(P)dim(\mathcal{P}), is the minimum cardinality of a realizer of P\mathcal{P}. A \emph{containment model} MPM_{\mathcal{P}} of a poset P=(X,⪯)\mathcal{P}=(X,\preceq) maps every x∈Xx \in X to a set MxM_x such that, for every distinct x,y∈X, x⪯yx,y \in X,\ x \preceq y if and only if Mx⊊MyM_x \varsubsetneq M_y. We shall be using the collection (Mx)x∈X(M_x)_{x \in X} to identify the containment model MPM_{\mathcal{P}}. A poset P=(X,⪯)\mathcal{P}=(X,\preceq) is a Containment order of Paths in a Tree (CPT poset), if it admits a containment model MP=(Px)x∈XM_{\mathcal{P}}=(P_x)_{x \in X} where every PxP_x is a path of a tree TT, which is called the host tree of the model. We show that if a poset P\mathcal{P} admits a CPT model in a host tree TT of maximum degree ΔΔ and radius rr, then \rogers{dim(P)≤lg⁡lg⁡Δ+(12+o(1))lg⁡lg⁡lg⁡Δ+lg⁡r+12lg⁡lg⁡r+12lg⁡π+3dim(\mathcal{P}) \leq \lg\lg Δ+ (\frac{1}{2} + o(1))\lg\lg\lg Δ+ \lg r + \frac{1}{2} \lg\lg r + \frac{1}{2}\lg π+ 3. This bound is asymptotically tight up to an additive factor of min⁡(12lg⁡lg⁡lg⁡Δ,12lg⁡lg⁡r)\min(\frac{1}{2}\lg\lg\lg Δ, \frac{1}{2}\lg\lg r). Further, let P(1,2;n)\mathcal{P}(1,2;n) be the poset consisting of all the 11-element and 22-element subsets of [n][n] under `containment' relation and let dim(1,2;n)dim(1,2;n) denote its dimension. The proof of our main theorem gives a simple algorithm to construct a realizer for P(1,2;n)\mathcal{P}(1,2;n) whose cardinality is only an additive factor of at most 32\frac{3}{2} away from the optimum.

preprint2020arXiv

New bounds on the Ramsey number r(Im,Ln)r(I_m, L_n)

We investigate the Ramsey numbers r(Im,Ln)r(I_m, L_n) which is the minimal natural number kk such that every oriented graph on kk vertices contains either an independent set of size mm or a transitive tournament on nn vertices. Apart from the finitary combinatorial interest, these Ramsey numbers are of interest to set theorists since it is known that r(ωm,n)=ωr(Im,Ln)r(ωm, n) = ωr(I_m, L_n), where ωω is the lowest transfinite ordinal number, and r(κm,n)=κr(Im,Ln)r(κm, n) = κr(I_m, L_n) for all initial ordinals κκ. Continuing the research by Bermond from 1974 who did show r(I3,L3)=9r(I_3, L_3) = 9, we prove r(I4,L3)=15r(I_4, L_3) = 15 and r(I5,L3)=23r(I_5, L_3) = 23. The upper bounds for both the estimates above are obtained by improving the upper bound of m2m^2 on r(Im,L3)r(I_m, L_3) due to Larson and Mitchell (1997) to m2−m+3m^2 - m + 3. Additionally, we provide asymptotic upper bounds on r(Im,Ln)r(I_m, L_n) for all n≥3n \geq 3. In particular, we show that r(Im,L3)∈Θ(m2/log⁡m)r(I_m, L_3) \in Θ(m^2 / \log m).

preprint2016arXiv

Track number of line graphs

The track number τ(G)τ(G) of a graph GG is the minimum number of interval graphs whose union is GG. We show that the track number of the line graph L(G)L(G) of a triangle-free graph GG is at least lg⁡lg⁡χ(G)+1\lg \lg χ(G) + 1, where χ(G)χ(G) is the chromatic number of GG. Using this lower bound and two classical Ramsey-theoretic results from literature, we answer two questions posed by Milans, Stolee, and West [J. Combinatorics, 2015] (MSW15). First we show that the track number τ(L(Kn))τ(L(K_n)) of the line graph of the complete graphs KnK_n is at least lg⁡lg⁡n−o(1)\lg\lg n - o(1). This is asymptotically tight and it improves the bound of Ω(lg⁡lg⁡n/lg⁡lg⁡lg⁡n)Ω(\lg\lg n/ \lg\lg\lg n) in MSW15. Next we show that for a family of graphs G\mathcal{G}, {τ(L(G)):G∈G}\{τ(L(G)):G \in \mathcal{G}\} is bounded if and only if {χ(G):G∈G}\{χ(G):G \in \mathcal{G}\} is bounded. This affirms a conjecture in MSW15. All our lower bounds apply even if one enlarges the covering family from the family of interval graphs to the family of chordal graphs.

preprint2015arXiv

Boundaries of Hypertrees, and Hamiltonian Cycles in Simplicial Complexes

A dd-hypertree on [n][n] is a maximal acyclic dd-dimensional simplicial complex with full (d−1)(d-1)-skeleton on the vertex set [n][n]. Alternatively, in the language of algebraic topology, it is a minimal dd-dimensional simplicial complex TT (assuming full (d−1)(d-1)-skeleton) such that H~d−1(T;F)=0\tilde{H}_{d-1}(T;\mathbb{F})=0. The dd-hypertrees are a basic object in combinatorial theory of simplicial complexes. They have been studied; and yet, many of their structural aspects remain poorly understood. In this paper we study the boundaries ∂dT\partial_d T of dd-hypertrees, and the fundamental dd-cycles defined by them. Our findings include: 1. A full characterization of ∂dT\partial_d T over F2\mathbb{F}_2 for d≤2d \leq 2, and some partial results for d≥3d \geq 3. 2. Lower bounds on the maximum size of a largest simple dd-cycle on [n][n]. In particular, for d=2d=2, we construct a {\em Hamiltonian dd-cycle} HH on [n][n], i.e., a simple dd-cycle of size (n−1d)+1{{n-1} \choose d} + 1. For d≥3d\geq 3, we construct a simple dd-cycle of size (n−1d)−O(nd−2){{n-1} \choose d} - O(n^{d-2}). 3. Observing that the maximum of the expected distance between two vertices chosen uniformly at random in a tree (11-hypertree) on [n][n] is at most ∼n/3\thicksim n/3, attained on Hamiltonian paths, we ask a similar question about dd-hypertrees. "How large can be the {\em average} size of a fundamental cycle of a dd-hypertree TT (i.e., the expected size of the dependency created by adding a dd-simplex on [n][n], chosen uniformly at random, to TT)?" For every d∈Nd \in \mathbb{N}, we construct an infinite family of dd-hypertrees {T}\{T\} with the average size of a fundamental cycle at least cd ∣T∣ = cd (n−1d)c_d\, |T| \,=\, c_d\,{n-1 \choose d}, where cdc_d is a constant depending on the dimension dd alone.

preprint2014arXiv

2-connecting Outerplanar Graphs without Blowing Up the Pathwidth

Given a connected outerplanar graph G of pathwidth p, we give an algorithm to add edges to G to get a supergraph of G, which is 2-vertex-connected, outerplanar and of pathwidth O(p). This settles an open problem raised by Biedl, in the context of computing minimum height planar straight line drawings of outerplanar graphs, with their vertices placed on a two dimensional grid. In conjunction with the result of this paper, the constant factor approximation algorithm for this problem obtained by Biedl for 2-vertex-connected outerplanar graphs will work for all outer planar graphs.

preprint2014arXiv

Approximating the Cubicity of Trees

Cubicity of a graph GG is the smallest dimension dd, for which GG is a unit disc graph in Rd{\mathbb{R}}^d, under the l∞l^\infty metric, i.e. GG can be represented as an intersection graph of dd-dimensional (axis-parallel) unit hypercubes. We call such an intersection representation a dd-dimensional cube representation of GG. Computing cubicity is known to be inapproximable in polynomial time, within an O(n1−ε)O(n^{1-ε}) factor for any ε>0ε>0, unless NP=ZPP. In this paper, we present a randomized algorithm that runs in polynomial time and computes cube representations of trees, of dimension within a constant factor of the optimum. It is also shown that the cubicity of trees can be approximated within a constant factor in deterministic polynomial time, if the cube representation is not required to be computed. As far as we know, this is the first constant factor approximation algorithm for computing the cubicity of trees. It is not yet clear whether computing the cubicity of trees is NP-hard or not.

preprint2014arXiv

Boxicity and separation dimension

A family F\mathcal{F} of permutations of the vertices of a hypergraph HH is called 'pairwise suitable' for HH if, for every pair of disjoint edges in HH, there exists a permutation in F\mathcal{F} in which all the vertices in one edge precede those in the other. The cardinality of a smallest such family of permutations for HH is called the 'separation dimension' of HH and is denoted by π(H)π(H). Equivalently, π(H)π(H) is the smallest natural number kk so that the vertices of HH can be embedded in Rk\mathbb{R}^k such that any two disjoint edges of HH can be separated by a hyperplane normal to one of the axes. We show that the separation dimension of a hypergraph HH is equal to the 'boxicity' of the line graph of HH. This connection helps us in borrowing results and techniques from the extensive literature on boxicity to study the concept of separation dimension.

preprint2014arXiv

Domination in designs

We commence the study of domination in the incidence graphs of combinatorial designs. Let DD be a combinatorial design and denote by γ(D)γ(D) the domination number of the incidence (Levy) graph of DD. We obtain a number of results about the domination numbers of various kinds of designs. For instance, a finite projective plane of order nn, which is a symmetric (n2+n+1,n+1,1)(n^{2}+n+1,n+1,1)-design, has γ=2nγ=2n. %We also show that for any symmetric (v,k,λ)(v,k,λ)-design it holds that γ≤2kγ\leq 2k. We study at depth the domination numbers of Steiner systems and in particular of Steiner triple systems. We show that a STS(v)STS(v) has γ≥23v−1γ\geq \frac{2}{3}v-1 and also obtain a number of upper bounds. The tantalizing conjecture that all Steiner triple systems on vv vertices have the same domination number is proposed and is verified up to v≤15v \leq 15. The structure of minimal dominating sets is also investigated, both for its own sake and as a tool in deriving lower bounds on γγ. Finally, a number of open questions are proposed.

preprint2014arXiv

On Additive Combinatorics of Permutations of \mathbb{Z}_n

Let Zn\mathbb{Z}_n denote the ring of integers modulo nn. In this paper we consider two extremal problems on permutations of Zn\mathbb{Z}_n, namely, the maximum size of a collection of permutations such that the sum of any two distinct permutations in the collection is again a permutation, and the maximum size of a collection of permutations such that the sum of any two distinct permutations in the collection is not a permutation. Let the sizes be denoted by s(n)s(n) and t(n)t(n) respectively. The case when nn is even is trivial in both the cases, with s(n)=1s(n)=1 and t(n)=n!t(n)=n!. For nn odd, we prove s(n)≥(nϕ(n))/2ks(n)\geq (nϕ(n))/2^k where kk is the number of distinct prime divisors of nn. When nn is an odd prime we prove s(n)≤e2πn((n−1)/e)n−12s(n)\leq \frac{e^2}π n ((n-1)/e)^\frac{n-1}{2}. For the second problem, we prove 2(n−1)/2.(n−12)!≤t(n)≤2k.(n−1)!/ϕ(n)2^{(n-1)/2}.(\frac{n-1}{2})!\leq t(n)\leq 2^k.(n-1)!/ϕ(n) when nn is odd.

preprint2014arXiv

Partial list colouring of certain graphs

Let GG be a graph on nn vertices and let Lk\mathcal{L}_k be an arbitrary function that assigns each vertex in GG a list of kk colours. Then GG is Lk\mathcal{L}_k-list colourable if there exists a proper colouring of the vertices of GG such that every vertex is coloured with a colour from its own list. We say GG is kk-choosable if for every such function Lk\mathcal{L}_k, GG is Lk\mathcal{L}_k-list colourable. The minimum kk such that GG is kk-choosable is called the list chromatic number of GG and is denoted by χL(G)χ_L(G). Let χL(G)=sχ_L(G) = s and let tt be a positive integer less than ss. The partial list colouring conjecture due to Albertson et al. \cite{albertson2000partial} states that for every Lt\mathcal{L}_t that maps the vertices of GG to tt-sized lists, there always exists an induced subgraph of GG of size at least tns\frac{tn}{s} that is Lt\mathcal{L}_t-list colourable. In this paper we show that the partial list colouring conjecture holds true for certain classes of graphs like claw-free graphs, graphs with large chromatic number, chordless graphs, and series-parallel graphs. In the second part of the paper, we put forth a question which is a variant of the partial list colouring conjecture: does GG always contain an induced subgraph of size at least tns\frac{tn}{s} that is tt-choosable? We show that the answer to this question is not always `yes' by explicitly constructing an infinite family of 33-choosable graphs where a largest induced 22-choosable subgraph of each graph in the family is of size at most 5n8\frac{5n}{8}.

preprint2014arXiv

Rainbow Colouring of Split Graphs

A rainbow path in an edge coloured graph is a path in which no two edges are coloured the same. A rainbow colouring of a connected graph G is a colouring of the edges of G such that every pair of vertices in G is connected by at least one rainbow path. The minimum number of colours required to rainbow colour G is called its rainbow connection number. Between them, Chakraborty et al. [J. Comb. Optim., 2011] and Ananth et al. [FSTTCS, 2012] have shown that for every integer k, k \geq 2, it is NP-complete to decide whether a given graph can be rainbow coloured using k colours. A split graph is a graph whose vertex set can be partitioned into a clique and an independent set. Chandran and Rajendraprasad have shown that the problem of deciding whether a given split graph G can be rainbow coloured using 3 colours is NP-complete and further have described a linear time algorithm to rainbow colour any split graph using at most one colour more than the optimum [COCOON, 2012]. In this article, we settle the computational complexity of the problem on split graphs and thereby discover an interesting dichotomy. Specifically, we show that the problem of deciding whether a given split graph can be rainbow coloured using k colours is NP-complete for k \in {2,3}, but can be solved in polynomial time for all other values of k.

preprint2014arXiv

Separation dimension of bounded degree graphs

The 'separation dimension' of a graph GG is the smallest natural number kk for which the vertices of GG can be embedded in Rk\mathbb{R}^k such that any pair of disjoint edges in GG can be separated by a hyperplane normal to one of the axes. Equivalently, it is the smallest possible cardinality of a family F\mathcal{F} of total orders of the vertices of GG such that for any two disjoint edges of GG, there exists at least one total order in F\mathcal{F} in which all the vertices in one edge precede those in the other. In general, the maximum separation dimension of a graph on nn vertices is Θ(log⁡n)Θ(\log n). In this article, we focus on bounded degree graphs and show that the separation dimension of a graph with maximum degree dd is at most 29log⋆dd2^{9log^{\star} d} d. We also demonstrate that the above bound is nearly tight by showing that, for every dd, almost all dd-regular graphs have separation dimension at least ⌈d/2⌉\lceil d/2\rceil.

preprint2014arXiv

Separation dimension of sparse graphs

The separation dimension of a graph GG is the smallest natural number kk for which the vertices of GG can be embedded in Rk\mathbb{R}^k such that any pair of disjoint edges in GG can be separated by a hyperplane normal to one of the axes. Equivalently, it is the smallest possible cardinality of a family F\mathcal{F} of permutations of the vertices of GG such that for any two disjoint edges of GG, there exists at least one permutation in F\mathcal{F} in which all the vertices in one edge precede those in the other. In general, the maximum separation dimension of a graph on nn vertices is Θ(log⁡n)Θ(\log n). In this article, we focus on sparse graphs and show that the maximum separation dimension of a kk-degenerate graph on nn vertices is O(klog⁡log⁡n)O(k \log\log n) and that there exists a family of 22-degenerate graphs with separation dimension Ω(log⁡log⁡n)Ω(\log\log n). We also show that the separation dimension of the graph G1/2G^{1/2} obtained by subdividing once every edge of another graph GG is at most (1+o(1))log⁡log⁡χ(G)(1 + o(1)) \log\log χ(G) where χ(G)χ(G) is the chromatic number of the original graph.

preprint2014arXiv

Upper bound on cubicity in terms of boxicity for graphs of low chromatic number

The boxicity (respectively cubicity) of a graph GG is the minimum non-negative integer kk, such that GG can be represented as an intersection graph of axis-parallel kk-dimensional boxes (respectively kk-dimensional unit cubes) and is denoted by box(G)box(G) (respectively cub(G)cub(G)). It was shown by Adiga and Chandran (Journal of Graph Theory, 65(4), 2010) that for any graph GG, cub(G)≤cub(G) \le box(G)⌈log⁡2α⌉(G) \left \lceil \log_2 α\right \rceil, where α=α(G)α= α(G) is the cardinality of the maximum independent set in GG. In this note we show that cub(G)≤2⌈log⁡2χ(G)⌉box(G)+χ(G)⌈log⁡2α(G)⌉cub(G) \le 2 \left \lceil \log_2 χ(G) \right \rceil box(G) + χ(G) \left \lceil \log_2 α(G) \right \rceil . In general, this result can provide a much better upper bound than that of Adiga and Chandran for graph classes with bounded chromatic number. For example, for bipartite graphs we get, cub(G)≤2(box(G)+⌈log⁡2α(G)⌉)cub(G) \le 2 (box(G) + \left \lceil \log_2 α(G) \right \rceil ). Moreover we show that for every positive integer kk, there exist graphs with chromatic number kk, such that for every ε>0ε> 0, the value given by our upper bound is at most (1+ε)(1+ε) times their cubicity. Thus, our upper bound is almost tight.

preprint2013arXiv

Boxicity and Cubicity of Product Graphs

The 'boxicity' ('cubicity') of a graph G is the minimum natural number k such that G can be represented as an intersection graph of axis-parallel rectangular boxes (axis-parallel unit cubes) in RkR^k. In this article, we give estimates on the boxicity and the cubicity of Cartesian, strong and direct products of graphs in terms of invariants of the component graphs. In particular, we study the growth, as a function of dd, of the boxicity and the cubicity of the dd-th power of a graph with respect to the three products. Among others, we show a surprising result that the boxicity and the cubicity of the dd-th Cartesian power of any given finite graph is in O(log⁡d/log⁡log⁡d)O(\log d / \log\log d) and θ(d/log⁡d)θ(d / \log d), respectively. On the other hand, we show that there cannot exist any sublinear bound on the growth of the boxicity of powers of a general graph with respect to strong and direct products.

preprint2012arXiv

Pairwise Suitable Family of Permutations and Boxicity

A family F of permutations of the vertices of a hypergraph H is called "pairwise suitable" for H if, for every pair of disjoint edges in H, there exists a permutation in F in which all the vertices in one edge precede those in the other. The cardinality of a smallest such family of permutations for H is called the "separation dimension" of H and is denoted by π(H). Equivalently, π(H) is the smallest natural number k so that the vertices of H can be embedded in R^k such that any two disjoint edges of H can be separated by a hyperplane normal to one of the axes. We show that the separation dimension of a hypergraph H is equal to the "boxicity" of the line graph of H. This connection helps us in borrowing results and techniques from the extensive literature on boxicity to study the concept of separation dimension.

preprint2012arXiv

Product Dimension of Forests and Bounded Treewidth Graphs

The product dimension of a graph G is defined as the minimum natural number l such that G is an induced subgraph of a direct product of l complete graphs. In this paper we study the product dimension of forests, bounded treewidth graphs and k-degenerate graphs. We show that every forest on n vertices has a product dimension at most 1.441logn+3. This improves the best known upper bound of 3logn for the same due to Poljak and Pultr. The technique used in arriving at the above bound is extended and combined with a result on existence of orthogonal Latin squares to show that every graph on n vertices with a treewidth at most t has a product dimension at most (t+2)(logn+1). We also show that every k-degenerate graph on n vertices has a product dimension at most \ceil{8.317klogn}+1. This improves the upper bound of 32klogn for the same by Eaton and Rodl.

preprint2012arXiv

Rainbow Colouring of Split and Threshold Graphs

A rainbow colouring of a connected graph is a colouring of the edges of the graph, such that every pair of vertices is connected by at least one path in which no two edges are coloured the same. Such a colouring using minimum possible number of colours is called an optimal rainbow colouring, and the minimum number of colours required is called the rainbow connection number of the graph. In this article, we show the following: 1. The problem of deciding whether a graph can be rainbow coloured using 3 colours remains NP-complete even when restricted to the class of split graphs. However, any split graph can be rainbow coloured in linear time using at most one more colour than the optimum. 2. For every integer k larger than 2, the problem of deciding whether a graph can be rainbow coloured using k colours remains NP-complete even when restricted to the class of chordal graphs. 3. For every positive integer k, threshold graphs with rainbow connection number k can be characterised based on their degree sequence alone. Further, we can optimally rainbow colour a threshold graph in linear time.

preprint2012arXiv

Rainbow Connection Number and Radius

The rainbow connection number, rc(G), of a connected graph G is the minimum number of colours needed to colour its edges, so that every pair of its vertices is connected by at least one path in which no two edges are coloured the same. In this note we show that for every bridgeless graph G with radius r, rc(G) <= r(r + 2). We demonstrate that this bound is the best possible for rc(G) as a function of r, not just for bridgeless graphs, but also for graphs of any stronger connectivity. It may be noted that for a general 1-connected graph G, rc(G) can be arbitrarily larger than its radius (Star graph for instance). We further show that for every bridgeless graph G with radius r and chordality (size of a largest induced cycle) k, rc(G) <= rk. It is known that computing rc(G) is NP-Hard [Chakraborty et al., 2009]. Here, we present a (r+3)-factor approximation algorithm which runs in O(nm) time and a (d+3)-factor approximation algorithm which runs in O(dm) time to rainbow colour any connected graph G on n vertices, with m edges, diameter d and radius r.

preprint2011arXiv

On Rainbow Connection Number and Connectivity

Rainbow connection number, rc(G)rc(G), of a connected graph GG is the minimum number of colours needed to colour its edges, so that every pair of vertices is connected by at least one path in which no two edges are coloured the same. In this paper we investigate the relationship of rainbow connection number with vertex and edge connectivity. It is already known that for a connected graph with minimum degree δδ, the rainbow connection number is upper bounded by 3n/(δ+1)+33n/(δ+ 1) + 3 [Chandran et al., 2010]. This directly gives an upper bound of 3n/(λ+1)+33n/(λ+ 1) + 3 and 3n/(κ+1)+33n/(κ+ 1) + 3 for rainbow connection number where λλ and κκ, respectively, denote the edge and vertex connectivity of the graph. We show that the above bound in terms of edge connectivity is tight up-to additive constants and show that the bound in terms of vertex connectivity can be improved to (2+ε)n/κ+23/ε2(2 + ε)n/κ+ 23/ ε^2, for any ε>0ε> 0. We conjecture that rainbow connection number is upper bounded by n/κ+O(1)n/κ+ O(1) and show that it is true for κ=2κ= 2. We also show that the conjecture is true for chordal graphs and graphs of girth at least 7.

preprint2011arXiv

Rainbow Connection Number of Graph Power and Graph Products

Rainbow connection number, rc(G), of a connected graph G is the minimum number of colors needed to color its edges so that every pair of vertices is connected by at least one path in which no two edges are colored the same (Note that the coloring need not be proper). In this paper we study the rainbow connection number with respect to three important graph product operations (namely cartesian product, lexicographic product and strong product) and the operation of taking the power of a graph. In this direction, we show that if G is a graph obtained by applying any of the operations mentioned above on non-trivial graphs, then rc(G) <= 2r(G)+c, where r(G) denotes the radius of G and c \in {0,1,2}. In general the rainbow connection number of a bridgeless graph can be as high as the square of its radius [Basavaraju et. al, 2010]. This is an attempt to identify some graph classes which have rainbow connection number very close to the obvious lower bound of diameter (and thus the radius). The bounds reported are tight upto additive constants. The proofs are constructive and hence yield polynomial time (2 + 2/r(G))-factor approximation algorithms.

preprint2010arXiv

Rainbow Connection Number and Connected Dominating Sets

Rainbow connection number rc(G) of a connected graph G is the minimum number of colours needed to colour the edges of G, so that every pair of vertices is connected by at least one path in which no two edges are coloured the same. In this paper we show that for every connected graph G, with minimum degree at least 2, the rainbow connection number is upper bounded by γ_c(G) + 2, where γ_c(G) is the connected domination number of G. Bounds of the form diameter(G) \leq rc(G) \leq diameter(G) + c, 1 \leq c \leq 4, for many special graph classes follow as easy corollaries from this result. This includes interval graphs, AT-free graphs, circular arc graphs, threshold graphs, and chain graphs all with minimum degree at least 2 and connected. We also show that every bridge-less chordal graph G has rc(G) \leq 3.radius(G). In most of these cases, we also demonstrate the tightness of the bounds. An extension of this idea to two-step dominating sets is used to show that for every connected graph on n vertices with minimum degree δ, the rainbow connection number is upper bounded by 3n/(δ + 1) + 3. This solves an open problem of Schiermeyer (2009), improving the previously best known bound of 20n/δ by Krivelevich and Yuster (2010). Moreover, this bound is seen to be tight up to additive factors by a construction of Caro et al. (2008).

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.