Researcher profile

L. Sunil Chandran

L. Sunil Chandran contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

New bounds on the anti-Ramsey numbers of star graphs

The anti-Ramsey number $ar(G,H)$ with input graph $G$ and pattern graph $H$, is the maximum positive integer $k$ such that there exists an edge coloring of $G$ using $k$ colors, in which there are no rainbow subgraphs isomorphic to $H$ in $G$. ($H$ is rainbow if all its edges get distinct colors). The concept of anti-Ramsey number was introduced by Erdös, Simanovitz, and Sós in 1973. Thereafter several researchers investigated this concept in the combinatorial setting. Recently, Feng et al. revisited the anti-Ramsey problem for the pattern graph $K_{1,t}$ (for $t \geq 3$) purely from an algorithmic point of view due to its applications in interference modeling of wireless networks. They posed it as an optimization problem, the maximum edge $q$-coloring problem. For a graph $G$ and an integer $q\geq 2$, an edge $q$-coloring of $G$ is an assignment of colors to edges of $G$, such that edges incident on a vertex span at most $q$ distinct colors. The maximum edge $q$-coloring problem seeks to maximize the number of colors in an edge $q$-coloring of the graph $G$. Note that the optimum value of the edge $q$-coloring problem of $G$ equals $ar(G,K_{1,q+1})$. In this paper, we study $ar(G,K_{1,t})$, the anti-Ramsey number of stars, for each fixed integer $t\geq 3$, both from combinatorial and algorithmic point of view. The first of our main results presents an upper bound for $ar(G,K_{1,q+1})$, in terms of number of vertices and the minimum degree of $G$. The second one improves this result for the case of triangle-free input graphs. For a positive integer $t$, let $H_t$ denote a subgraph of $G$ with maximum number of possible edges and maximum degree $t$. Our third main result presents an upper bound for $ar(G,K_{1,q+1})$ in terms of $|E(H_{q-1})|$. All our results have algorithmic consequences.

preprint2022arXiv

Weakening Total Coloring Conjecture: Weak TCC and Hadwiger's Conjecture on Total Graphs

Hadwiger's conjecture is one of the most important and long-standing conjectures in graph theory. Reed and Seymour showed in 2004 that Hadwiger's conjecture is true for line graphs. We investigate this conjecture on the closely related class of total graphs. The total graph of $G$, denoted by $T(G)$, is defined on the vertex set $V(G)\sqcup E(G)$ with $c_1,c_2\in V(G)\sqcup E(G)$ adjacent whenever $c_1$ and $c_2$ are adjacent to or incident on each other in $G$. We first show that there exists a constant $C$ such that, if the connectivity of $G$ is at least $C$, then Hadwiger's conjecture is true for $T(G)$. The total chromatic number $χ"(G)$ of a graph $G$ is defined to be equal to the chromatic number of its total graph. That is, $χ"(G)=χ(T(G))$. Another well-known conjecture in graph theory, the total coloring conjecture or TCC, states that for every graph $G$, $χ"(G)\leqΔ(G)+2$, where $Δ(G)$ is the maximum degree of $G$. We show that if a weaker version of the total coloring conjecture (weak TCC) namely, $χ"(G)\leqΔ(G)+3$, is true for a class of graphs $\mathcal{F}$ that is closed under the operation of taking subgraphs, then Hadwiger's conjecture is true for the class of total graphs of graphs in $\mathcal{F}$. This motivated us to look for classes of graphs that satisfy weak TCC. It may be noted that a complete proof of TCC for even 4-colorable graphs (in fact even for planar graphs) has remained elusive even after decades of effort; but weak TCC can be proved easily for 4-colorable graphs. We noticed that in spite of the interest in studying $χ"(G)$ in terms of $χ(G)$ right from the initial days, weak TCC is not proven to be true for $k$-colorable graphs even for $k=5$. In the second half of the paper, we make a contribution to the literature on total coloring by proving that $χ"(G)\leqΔ(G)+3$ for every 5-colorable graph $G$.

preprint2020arXiv

Upper Bounding Rainbow Connection Number by Forest Number

A path in an edge-colored graph is rainbow if no two edges of it are colored the same, and the graph is rainbow-connected if there is a rainbow path between each pair of its vertices. The minimum number of colors needed to rainbow-connect a graph $G$ is the rainbow connection number of $G$, denoted by $\text{rc}(G)$. A simple way to rainbow-connect a graph $G$ is to color the edges of a spanning tree with distinct colors and then re-use any of these colors to color the remaining edges of $G$. This proves that $\text{rc}(G) \le |V(G)|-1$. We ask whether there is a stronger connection between tree-like structures and rainbow coloring than that is implied by the above trivial argument. For instance, is it possible to find an upper bound of $t(G) -1$ for $\text{rc}(G)$, where $t(G)$ is the number of vertices in the largest induced tree of $G$? The answer turns out to be negative, as there are counter-examples that show that even $c\cdot t(G)$ is not an upper bound for $\text{rc}(G))$ for any given constant $c$. In this work we show that if we consider the forest number $f(G)$, the number of vertices in a maximum induced forest of $G$, instead of $t(G)$, then surprisingly we do get an upper bound. More specifically, we prove that $\text{rc}(G) \leq f(G) + 2$. Our result indicates a stronger connection between rainbow connection and tree-like structures than that was suggested by the simple spanning tree based upper bound.

preprint2011arXiv

A Constant Factor Approximation Algorithm for Boxicity of Circular Arc Graphs

Boxicity of a graph $G(V,E)$ is the minimum integer $k$ such that $G$ can be represented as the intersection graph of $k$-dimensional axis parallel rectangles in $\mathbf{R}^k$. Equivalently, it is the minimum number of interval graphs on the vertex set $V$ such that the intersection of their edge sets is $E$. It is known that boxicity cannot be approximated even for graph classes like bipartite, co-bipartite and split graphs below $O(n^{0.5 - ε})$-factor, for any $ε>0$ in polynomial time unless $NP=ZPP$. Till date, there is no well known graph class of unbounded boxicity for which even an $n^ε$-factor approximation algorithm for computing boxicity is known, for any $ε<1$. In this paper, we study the boxicity problem on Circular Arc graphs - intersection graphs of arcs of a circle. We give a $(2+\frac{1}{k})$-factor polynomial time approximation algorithm for computing the boxicity of any circular arc graph along with a corresponding box representation, where $k \ge 1$ is its boxicity. For Normal Circular Arc(NCA) graphs, with an NCA model given, this can be improved to an additive 2-factor approximation algorithm. The time complexity of the algorithms to approximately compute the boxicity is $O(mn+n^2)$ in both these cases and in $O(mn+kn^2)= O(n^3)$ time we also get their corresponding box representations, where $n$ is the number of vertices of the graph and $m$ is its number of edges. The additive 2-factor algorithm directly works for any Proper Circular Arc graph, since computing an NCA model for it can be done in polynomial time.

preprint2011arXiv

On Rainbow Connection Number and Connectivity

Rainbow connection number, $rc(G)$, of a connected graph $G$ is the minimum number of colours needed to colour its edges, so that every pair of vertices is connected by at least one path in which no two edges are coloured the same. In this paper we investigate the relationship of rainbow connection number with vertex and edge connectivity. It is already known that for a connected graph with minimum degree $δ$, the rainbow connection number is upper bounded by $3n/(δ+ 1) + 3$ [Chandran et al., 2010]. This directly gives an upper bound of $3n/(λ+ 1) + 3$ and $3n/(κ+ 1) + 3$ for rainbow connection number where $λ$ and $κ$, respectively, denote the edge and vertex connectivity of the graph. We show that the above bound in terms of edge connectivity is tight up-to additive constants and show that the bound in terms of vertex connectivity can be improved to $(2 + ε)n/κ+ 23/ ε^2$, for any $ε> 0$. We conjecture that rainbow connection number is upper bounded by $n/κ+ O(1)$ and show that it is true for $κ= 2$. We also show that the conjecture is true for chordal graphs and graphs of girth at least 7.

preprint2010arXiv

Acyclic Edge Coloring of Triangle Free Planar Graphs

An $acyclic$ edge coloring of a graph is a proper edge coloring such that there are no bichromatic cycles. The \emph{acyclic chromatic index} of a graph is the minimum number k such that there is an acyclic edge coloring using k colors and is denoted by $a&#39;(G)$. It was conjectured by Alon, Sudakov and Zaks (and much earlier by Fiamcik) that $a&#39;(G)\le Δ+2$, where $Δ=Δ(G)$ denotes the maximum degree of the graph. If every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$ satisfies the condition $\vert E(H) \vert \le 2\vert V(H) \vert -1$, we say that the graph $G$ satisfies $Property\ A$. In this paper, we prove that if $G$ satisfies $Property\ A$, then $a&#39;(G)\le Δ+ 3$. Triangle free planar graphs satisfy $Property\ A$. We infer that $a&#39;(G)\le Δ+ 3$, if $G$ is a triangle free planar graph. Another class of graph which satisfies $Property\ A$ is 2-fold graphs (union of two forests).

preprint2010arXiv

Boxicity and Poset Dimension

Let $G$ be a simple, undirected, finite graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. A $k$-dimensional box is a Cartesian product of closed intervals $[a_1,b_1]\times [a_2,b_2]\times...\times [a_k,b_k]$. The {\it boxicity} of $G$, $\boxi(G)$ is the minimum integer $k$ such that $G$ can be represented as the intersection graph of $k$-dimensional boxes, i.e. each vertex is mapped to a $k$-dimensional box and two vertices are adjacent in $G$ if and only if their corresponding boxes intersect. Let $\poset=(S,P)$ be a poset where $S$ is the ground set and $P$ is a reflexive, anti-symmetric and transitive binary relation on $S$. The dimension of $\poset$, $\dim(\poset)$ is the minimum integer $t$ such that $P$ can be expressed as the intersection of $t$ total orders. Let $G_\poset$ be the \emph{underlying comparability graph} of $\poset$, i.e. $S$ is the vertex set and two vertices are adjacent if and only if they are comparable in $\poset$. It is a well-known fact that posets with the same underlying comparability graph have the same dimension. The first result of this paper links the dimension of a poset to the boxicity of its underlying comparability graph. In particular, we show that for any poset $\poset$, $\boxi(G_\poset)/(χ(G_\poset)-1) \le \dim(\poset)\le 2\boxi(G_\poset)$, where $χ(G_\poset)$ is the chromatic number of $G_\poset$ and $χ(G_\poset)\ne1$. It immediately follows that if $\poset$ is a height-2 poset, then $\boxi(G_\poset)\le \dim(\poset)\le 2\boxi(G_\poset)$ since the underlying comparability graph of a height-2 poset is a bipartite graph. The second result of the paper relates the boxicity of a graph $G$ with a natural partial order associated with the \emph{extended double cover} of $G$, denoted as $G_c$: Note that $G_c$ is a bipartite graph with partite sets $A$ and $B$ which are copies of $V(G)$ such that corresponding to every $u\in V(G)$, there are two vertices $u_A\in A$ and $u_B\in B$ and $\{u_A,v_B\}$ is an edge in $G_c$ if and only if either $u=v$ or $u$ is adjacent to $v$ in $G$. Let $\poset_c$ be the natural height-2 poset associated with $G_c$ by making $A$ the set of minimal elements and $B$ the set of maximal elements. We show that $\frac{\boxi(G)}{2} \le \dim(\poset_c) \le 2\boxi(G)+4$. These results have some immediate and significant consequences. The upper bound $\dim(\poset)\le 2\boxi(G_\poset)$ allows us to derive hitherto unknown upper bounds for poset dimension such as $\dim(\poset)\le 2\tw(G_\poset)+4$, since boxicity of any graph is known to be at most its $\tw+2$. In the other direction, using the already known bounds for partial order dimension we get the following: (1) The boxicity of any graph with maximum degree $Δ$ is $O(Δ\log^2Δ)$ which is an improvement over the best known upper bound of $Δ^2+2$. (2) There exist graphs with boxicity $Ω(Δ\logΔ)$. This disproves a conjecture that the boxicity of a graph is $O(Δ)$. (3) There exists no polynomial-time algorithm to approximate the boxicity of a bipartite graph on $n$ vertices with a factor of $O(n^{0.5-ε})$ for any $ε>0$, unless $NP=ZPP$.

preprint2010arXiv

Boxicity of Line Graphs

Boxicity of a graph H, denoted by box(H), is the minimum integer k such that H is an intersection graph of axis-parallel k-dimensional boxes in R^k. In this paper, we show that for a line graph G of a multigraph, box(G) <= 2Δ(\lceil log_2(log_2(Δ)) \rceil + 3) + 1, where Δdenotes the maximum degree of G. Since Δ<= 2(χ- 1), for any line graph G with chromatic number χ, box(G) = O(χlog_2(log_2(χ))). For the d-dimensional hypercube H_d, we prove that box(H_d) >= (\lceil log_2(log_2(d)) \rceil + 1)/2. The question of finding a non-trivial lower bound for box(H_d) was left open by Chandran and Sivadasan in [L. Sunil Chandran and Naveen Sivadasan. The cubicity of Hypercube Graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 308(23):5795-5800, 2008]. The above results are consequences of bounds that we obtain for the boxicity of fully subdivided graphs (a graph which can be obtained by subdividing every edge of a graph exactly once).

preprint2010arXiv

The Hardness of Approximating the Threshold Dimension, Boxicity and Cubicity of a Graph

A $k$-dimensional box is the Cartesian product $R_1 \times R_2 \times ... \times R_k$ where each $R_i$ is a closed interval on the real line. The {\it boxicity} of a graph $G$, denoted as $\boxi(G)$, is the minimum integer $k$ such that $G$ can be represented as the intersection graph of a collection of $k$-dimensional boxes. A unit cube in $k$-dimensional space or a $k$-cube is defined as the Cartesian product $R_1 \times R_2 \times ... \times R_k$ where each $R_i$ is a closed interval on the real line of the form $[a_i,a_i + 1]$. The {\it cubicity} of $G$, denoted as $\cub(G)$, is the minimum integer $k$ such that $G$ can be represented as the intersection graph of a collection of $k$-cubes. The {\it threshold dimension} of a graph $G(V,E)$ is the smallest integer $k$ such that $E$ can be covered by $k$ threshold spanning subgraphs of $G$. In this paper we will show that there exists no polynomial-time algorithm to approximate the threshold dimension of a graph on $n$ vertices with a factor of $O(n^{0.5-ε})$ for any $ε>0$, unless $NP=ZPP$. From this result we will show that there exists no polynomial-time algorithm to approximate the boxicity and the cubicity of a graph on $n$ vertices with factor $O(n^{0.5-ε})$ for any $ ε>0$, unless $NP=ZPP$. In fact all these hardness results hold even for a highly structured class of graphs namely the split graphs. We will also show that it is NP-complete to determine if a given split graph has boxicity at most 3.