Paper detail

An Improvement to Chvátal and Thomassen's Upper Bound for Oriented Diameter

An orientation of an undirected graph $G$ is an assignment of exactly one direction to each edge of $G$. The oriented diameter of a graph $G$ is the smallest diameter among all the orientations of $G$. The maximum oriented diameter of a family of graphs $\mathscr{F}$ is the maximum oriented diameter among all the graphs in $\mathscr{F}$. Chvátal and Thomassen [JCTB, 1978] gave a lower bound of $\frac{1}{2}d^2+d$ and an upper bound of $2d^2+2d$ for the maximum oriented diameter of the family of $2$-edge connected graphs of diameter $d$. We improve this upper bound to $ 1.373 d^2 + 6.971d-1 $, which outperforms the former upper bound for all values of $d$ greater than or equal to $8$. For the family of $2$-edge connected graphs of diameter $3$, Kwok, Liu and West [JCTB, 2010] obtained improved lower and upper bounds of $9$ and $11$ respectively. For the family of $2$-edge connected graphs of diameter $4$, the bounds provided by Chvátal and Thomassen are $12$ and $40$ and no better bounds were known. By extending the method we used for diameter $d$ graphs, along with an asymmetric extension of a technique used by Chvátal and Thomassen, we have improved this upper bound to $21$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.