Paper detail

Domination in designs

We commence the study of domination in the incidence graphs of combinatorial designs. Let $D$ be a combinatorial design and denote by $γ(D)$ the domination number of the incidence (Levy) graph of $D$. We obtain a number of results about the domination numbers of various kinds of designs. For instance, a finite projective plane of order $n$, which is a symmetric $(n^{2}+n+1,n+1,1)$-design, has $γ=2n$. %We also show that for any symmetric $(v,k,λ)$-design it holds that $γ\leq 2k$. We study at depth the domination numbers of Steiner systems and in particular of Steiner triple systems. We show that a $STS(v)$ has $γ\geq \frac{2}{3}v-1$ and also obtain a number of upper bounds. The tantalizing conjecture that all Steiner triple systems on $v$ vertices have the same domination number is proposed and is verified up to $v \leq 15$. The structure of minimal dominating sets is also investigated, both for its own sake and as a tool in deriving lower bounds on $γ$. Finally, a number of open questions are proposed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.