BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

David Schug

David Schug contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.med-phphysics.ins-det

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Near-field coded-mask technique and its potential for proton therapy monitoring

Objective. Prompt-gamma imaging encompasses several approaches for online monitoring of beam range or deposited dose distribution in proton therapy. We test one of the imaging techniques - a coded mask approach - both experimentally and via simulations. Approach. Two imaging setups have been investigated experimentally. Each of them comprised a structured tungsten collimator in a form of a MURA mask and a LYSO:Ce scintillation detector of fine granularity. The setups differed in the detector dimensions and the operation mode (1D or 2D imaging). A series of measurements with radioactive sources have been conducted, testing the setups' performance of near-field gamma imaging. Additionally, Monte Carlo simulations of a larger setup of the same type were conducted, investigating its performance with a realistic gamma source distribution occurring during proton therapy. Main results. The images of point-like sources reconstructed from two smallscale prototypes' data using the MLEM algorithm constitute the experimental proof of principle for the near-field coded-mask imaging modality, both in the 1D and the 2D mode. Their precision allowed us to calibrate out certain systematic offsets appearing due to the misalignment of setup elements. The simulation of the full-scale setup yielded a mean distal falloff retrieval precision of 0.72 mm in the studies for beam energy range 89.5-107.9 MeV and with 1x10^8 protons (typical number for single distal spots). The implemented algorithm of image reconstruction is relatively fast - a typical procedure needs several seconds. Significance. Coded-mask imaging appears a valid option for proton therapy monitoring. The results of simulations let us conclude that the proposed fullscale setup is competitive to the knife-edge-shaped and the multiparalell slit cameras investigated by other groups.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Evaluation of semi-monolithic scintillators with integrated RF shielding material for a higher integration of PET/MRI systems

The integration of PET into MRI to form a hybrid system requires often compromises for both subsystems. For example, the integration might come at the cost of a reduced PET detector height or a reduced MRI examination volume diameter. Here, we propose a so-called shared-volume concept to use the volume required for both subsystems more efficiently, in which the MR transparency of the scintillator is exploited by integrating the RF shielding into the scintillator of the PET detector. Semi-monolithic scintillator prototypes (PVC slabs) of 7 mm and 12 mm height with integrated copper foil between every and every other slab, respectively, were investigated to evaluate the shielding effectiveness (SE). The SE was measured with probes on a test bench system. In addition, the PET detector performance was evaluated by determining the positioning using gradient tree boosting, energy and timing resolution using digital SiPM arrays (DPC3200, PDPC) in three LYSO scintillator configurations: ESR separation (Slab$\mathrm{_{ESR}}$), ESR with copper foil in between (Slab$\mathrm{_{ESR+Cu}}$), and purely copper foil separation (Slab$\mathrm{_{Cu}}$). The prototype with shielding between each slab and 12 mm height showed the highest SE with 31 dB (mean) in combination with a supporting frame. While Slab$\mathrm{_{Cu}}$ was best for positioning, followed by Slab$\mathrm{_{ESR}}$ and Slab$\mathrm{_{ESR+Cu}}$, the Slab$\mathrm{_{ESR}}$ had the best energy resolution (10.6 %), followed by Slab$\mathrm{_{ESR+Cu}}$ (11.2 %) and Slab$\mathrm{_{Cu}}$ (12.6 %). For the timing resolution, Slab$\mathrm{_{ESR}}$ and Slab$\mathrm{_{Cu}}$ achieved 279 ps and 288 ps, respectively. Slab$\mathrm{_{ESR+Cu}}$ performed worst (293 ps). The scintillator-based RF shielding shows good RF shielding with similar PET performance, demonstrating the potential for more effective integration of PET detectors into MRI systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Evaluation Of The PETsys TOFPET2 ASIC In Multi-Channel Coincidence Experiments

Aiming to measure the difference in arrival times of two coincident gamma-photons with an accuracy in the order of 200 ps, time-of-flight positron emission tomography systems commonly employ silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) and high-resolution digitization electronics, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs). This work evaluates the performance of the TOFPET2 ASIC, released by PETsys Electronics S.A. in 2017, dependent on its configuration parameters in multi-channel coincidence measurements. SiPM arrays fabricated by different vendors (KETEK, SensL, Hamamatsu, Broadcom) were tested in combination with the ASIC. Scintillator arrays featuring different reflector designs and different configurations of the TOFPET2 ASIC software parameters were evaluated. The benchtop setup used is provided with the TOFPET2 ASIC evaluation kit by PETsys Electronics S.A.. Compared to existing studies featuring the TOFPET2 ASIC, multi-channel performance results dependent on a larger set of ASIC configuration parameters were obtained that have not been reported to this extend so far. The ASIC shows promising CRTs down to 219.9 ps in combination with two Hamamatsu S14161-3050-HS-08 SiPM arrays (128 channels read out, energy resolution 13.08 %) and 216.1 ps in combination with two Broadcom AFBR-S4N44P643S SiPM arrays (32 channels read out, energy resolution 9.46 %). The length of the trigger delay of the dark count suppression scheme has an impact on the ASIC performance. The integrator gain configuration has been investigated and allows an improvement of the energy resolution. Measuring up to the time-of-flight performance of state-of-the-art positron emission tomography (ToF-PET) systems while providing a uniform and stable readout for multiple channels at the same time, the TOFPET2 ASIC is treated as promising candidate for the integration in future ToF-PET systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Comments on the NEMA NU 4-2008 Standard on Performance Measurement of Small Animal Positron Emission Tomographs

The National Electrical Manufacturers Association's (NEMA) NU 4-2008 standard specifies methodology for evaluating the performance of small-animal PET scanners. The standard's goal is to enable comparison of different PET scanners over a wide range of technologies and geometries used. In this work, we discuss if the NEMA standard meets these goals and we point out potential flaws and improvements to the standard. For the evaluation of spatial resolution, the NEMA standard mandates the use of filtered backprojection reconstruction. This reconstruction method can introduce star-like artifacts for detectors with an anisotropic spatial resolution, usually caused by parallax error. These artifacts can then cause a strong dependence of the resulting spatial resolution on the size of the projection window in image space, whose size is not fully specified in the NEMA standard. We show that the standard's equations for the estimation of the random rate for PET systems with intrinsic radioactivity are circular and not satisfiable. We compare random rates determined by a method based on the standard to to random rates obtained using a delayed coincidence window and two methods based on the singles rates. We discuss to what extend the NEMA standard's protocol for the evaluation of the sensitivity is unclear and ambiguous, which can lead to unclear interpretations of publicizeded results. The standard's definition of the recovery coefficients in the image quality phantom includes the maximum activity in a region of interest, which causes a positive correlation of noise and recovery coefficients. This leads to an unintended trade-off between desired uniformity, which is negatively correlated with variance (i.e. noise), and recovery. With this work, we want to start a discussion on possible improvements in a next version of the NEMA NU-4 standard.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access