BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

David Robinson

David Robinson contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial Intelligenceastro-ph.COastro-ph.GAeess.ASMachine LearningSound

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Beyond the Baseband: Adaptive Multi-Band Encoding for Full-Spectrum Bioacoustics Classification

Animals hear and vocalize across frequency ranges that differ substantially from humans, often extending into the ultrasonic domain. Yet most computational bioacoustics systems rely on audio models pre-trained at 16 kHz, restricting their usable bandwidth to the 0-8 kHz baseband and discarding higher-frequency information present in many bioacoustic recordings. We investigate a multi-band encoding framework that decomposes the full spectrum of animal calls into band features and fuses them into a unified representation. Similarity analyses on models show that certain encoders produce decorrelated band embeddings that improve class separation after fusion. Classification experiments on three bioacoustic datasets using eight pre-trained models and five fusion strategies show that fused representations consistently outperform the baseband and time-expansion baselines on two datasets, showing the potential of multi-band methods for full-spectrum encoding of animal calls.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Multi-layer attentive probing improves transfer of audio representations for bioacoustics

Probing heads map the representations learned from audio by a machine learning model to downstream task labels and are a key component in evaluating representation learning. Most bioacoustic benchmarks use a fixed, low-capacity probe, such as a linear layer on the final encoder layer. While this standardization enables model comparisons, it may bias results by overlooking the interaction between encoder features and probe design. In this work, we systematically study different probing strategies across two bioacoustic benchmarks, BEANs and BirdSet. We evaluate last- and multi-layer probing, across linear and attention probes. We show that larger probe heads that leverage time information have superior performance. Our results suggest that current benchmarks may misrepresent encoder quality when relying on a last-layer probing setup. Multi-layer probing improves downstream task performance across all tested models, while attention probing has superior performance to linear probing for transformer models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Can Cooling and Heating Functions be Modeled with Homogeneous Radiation Fields?

Cooling and heating functions describe how radiative processes impact the thermal state of a gas as a function of its temperature and other physical properties. In a most general case the functions depend on the detailed distributions of ionic species and on the radiation spectrum. Hence, these functions may vary on a very wide range of spatial and temporal scales. In this paper, we explore cooling and heating functions between $5\leq z \leq10$ in simulated galaxies from the Cosmic Reionization On Computers (CROC) project. We compare three functions. First, the actual cooling and heating rates of hydrodynamic cells as a function of cell temperature. Second, the median cooling and heating functions computed using median interstellar medium (ISM) properties (median ISM). Last, the median of the cooling and heating functions of all gas cells (instantaneous). We find that the median ISM and instantaneous approaches to finding a median cooling and heating function give identical results within the spread due to cell-to-cell variation. However, the actual cooling (heating) rates experienced by the gas at different temperatures in the simulations do not correspond to either summarized cooling (heating) functions. In other words, the thermodynamics of the gas in the simulations cannot be described by a single set of a cooling plus a heating function with a spatially constant radiation field that could be computed with common tools, such as Cloudy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access