Source author record

Daron Anderson

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.GN Machine Learning Networking and Internet Architecture

Catalog footprint

Research overview

7works

3topics

3close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2022arXiv

Lazy Lagrangians with Predictions for Online Learning

We consider the general problem of online convex optimization with time-varying additive constraints in the presence of predictions for the next cost and constraint functions. A novel primal-dual algorithm is designed by combining a Follow-The-Regularized-Leader iteration with prediction-adaptive dynamic steps. The algorithm achieves $\mathcal O(T^{\frac{3-β}{4}})$ regret and $\mathcal O(T^{\frac{1+β}{2}})$ constraint violation bounds that are tunable via parameter $β\!\in\![1/2,1)$ and have constant factors that shrink with the predictions quality, achieving eventually $\mathcal O(1)$ regret for perfect predictions. Our work extends the FTRL framework for this constrained OCO setting and outperforms the respective state-of-the-art greedy-based solutions, without imposing conditions on the quality of predictions, the cost functions or the geometry of constraints, beyond convexity.

preprint2022arXiv

Lazy Online Gradient Descent is Universal on Polytopes

We prove the familiar Lazy Online Gradient Descent algorithm is universal on polytope domains. That means it gets $O(1)$ pseudo-regret against i.i.d opponents, while simultaneously achieving the well-known $O(\sqrt N)$ worst-case regret bound. For comparison the bulk of the literature focuses on variants of the Hedge (exponential weights) algorithm on the simplex. These can in principle be lifted to general polytopes; however the process is computationally unfeasible for many important classes where the number of vertices grows quickly with the dimension. The lifting procedure also ignores any Euclidean bounds on the cost vectors, and can create extra factors of dimension in the pseudo-regret bound. Gradient Descent is simpler than the handful of purpose-built algorithms for polytopes in the literature, and works in a broader setting. In particular existing algorithms assume the optimiser is unique, while our bound allows for several optimal vertices.

preprint2020arXiv

Continuum Without Non-Block Points

For any composant $E \subset \mathbb H^*$ and corresponding near-coherence class $\mathscr E \subset ω^*$ we prove the following are equivalent : (1) $E$ properly contains a dense semicontinuum. (2) Each countable subset of $E$ is contained in a dense proper semicontinuum of $E$ . (3) Each countable subset of $E$ is disjoint from some dense proper semicontinuum of $E$ . (4) $\mathscr E$ has a minimal element in the finite-to-one monotone order of ultrafilters. (5) $\mathscr E$ has a $Q$ -point. A consequence is that NCF is equivalent to $\mathbb H^*$ containing no proper dense semicontinuum and no non-block points. This gives an axiom-contingent answer to a question of the author. Thus every known continuum has either a proper dense semicontinuum at every point or at no points. We examine the structure of indecomposable continua for which this fails, and deduce they contain a maximum semicontinuum with dense interior.

preprint2020arXiv

Indecomposable Continuum with a Strong Non-Cut Point

We construct an indecomposable continuum with exactly one strong non-cut point. The method is an adaptation of Bellamy $[1]$ . We start with an $ω_1$ -chain of indecomposable metric continua and retractions. The inverse limit is an indecomposable continuum with exactly two composants. Our example is formed by identifying a point in each composant.

preprint2020arXiv

Separable Indecomposable Continuum with Exactly One Composant

Indecomposable continua with one composant are $\textit{large}$ in the sense of being non-metrisable. We adapt the method of Smith $[18]$ to construct an example which is $\textit{small}$ in the sense of being separable.

preprint2020arXiv

Shore and Non-Block Points in Hausdorff Continua

We study the shore and non-block points of non-metric continua. We reduce the problem of showing a continuum to have non-block points to that of showing an indecomposable continuum to have non-block points. As a corollary we prove that separable continua have at least two non-block points -- and moreover are irreducible about their set of non-block points.

preprint2020arXiv

The Shore Point Existence Problem is Equivalent to the Non-Block Point Existence Problem

We prove the three propositions are equivalent: $(a)$ Every Hausdorff continuum has two or more shore points. $(b)$ Every Hausdorff continuum has two or more non-block points. $(c)$ Every Hausdorff continuum is coastal at each point. Thus it is consistent that all three properties fail. We also give the following characterisation of shore points: The point $p$ of the continuum $X$ is a shore point if and only if there is a net of subcontinua in $\{K \in C(X): K \subset κ(p) - p\}$ tending to $X$ in the Vietoris topology. This contrasts with the standard characterisation which only demands the net elements be contained in $X-p$ . In addition we prove every point of an indecomposable continuum is a shore point.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Daron Anderson

Research overview

Is this your work?

7 publications

Lazy Lagrangians with Predictions for Online Learning

Lazy Online Gradient Descent is Universal on Polytopes

Continuum Without Non-Block Points

Indecomposable Continuum with a Strong Non-Cut Point

Separable Indecomposable Continuum with Exactly One Composant

Shore and Non-Block Points in Hausdorff Continua

The Shore Point Existence Problem is Equivalent to the Non-Block Point Existence Problem

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview