BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Daniel L. Sussman

Daniel L. Sussman contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.STStatistics TheoryMethodologyMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Causal Inference under Network Interference with Noise

Increasingly, there is a marked interest in estimating causal effects under network interference due to the fact that interference manifests naturally in networked experiments. However, network information generally is available only up to some level of error. We study the propagation of such errors to estimators of average causal effects under network interference. Specifically, assuming a four-level exposure model and Bernoulli random assignment of treatment, we characterize the impact of network noise on the bias and variance of standard estimators in homogeneous and inhomogeneous networks. In addition, we propose method-of-moments estimators for bias reduction where a minimal number of network replicates are available. We show our estimators are asymptotically normal and provide confidence intervals for quantifying the uncertainty in these estimates. We illustrate the practical performance of our estimators through simulation studies in British secondary school contact networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Unbiased estimation for additive exposure models

Causal inference methods have been applied in various fields where researchers want to estimate treatment effects. In traditional causal inference settings, one assumes that the outcome of a unit does not depend on treatments of other units. However, as causal inference methods are extended to more applications, there is a greater need for estimators of general causal effects. We use an exposure mapping framework [Aronow and Samii, 2017] to map the relationship between the treatment allocation and the potential outcomes. Under the exposure model, we propose linear unbiased estimators (LUEs) for general causal effects under the assumption that treatment effects are additive. Additivity provides statistical advantages, where contrasts in exposures are now equivalent, and so the set of estimators considered grows. We identify a subset of LUEs that forms an affine basis for LUEs, and we characterize optimal LUEs with minimum integrated variance through defining conditions on the support of the estimator. We show, through simulations that our proposed estimators are fairly robust to violations of the additivity assumption, and in general, there is benefit in leveraging information from all exposures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Bias-Variance Tradeoffs in Joint Spectral Embeddings

Joint spectral embeddings facilitate analysis of multiple network data by simultaneously mapping vertices in each network to points in Euclidean space where statistical inference is then performed. In this work, we consider one such joint embedding technique, the omnibus embedding of arXiv:1705.09355 , which has been successfully used for community detection, anomaly detection, and hypothesis testing tasks. To date the theoretical properties of this method have only been established under the strong assumption that the networks are conditionally i.i.d. random dot product graphs. Herein, we take a first step in characterizing the theoretical properties of the omnibus embedding in the presence of heterogeneous network data. Under a latent position model, we show the omnibus embedding implicitly regularizes its latent position estimates which induces a finite-sample bias-variance tradeoff for latent position estimation. We establish an explicit bias expression, derive a uniform concentration bound on the residual, and prove a central limit theorem characterizing the distributional properties of these estimates. These explicit bias and variance expressions enable us to state sufficient conditions for exact recovery in community detection tasks and develop a pivotal test statistic to determine whether two graphs share the same set of latent positions; demonstrating that accurate inference is achievable despite the estimator's inconsistency. These results are demonstrated in several experimental settings where statistical procedures utilizing the omnibus embedding are competitive, and oftentimes preferable, to comparable embedding techniques. These observations accentuate the viability of the omnibus embedding for multiple graph inference beyond the homogeneous network setting.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Graph Matching in Errorfully Observed Networks

Given a pair of graphs with the same number of vertices, the inexact graph matching problem consists in finding a correspondence between the vertices of these graphs that minimizes the total number of induced edge disagreements. We study this problem from a statistical framework in which one of the graphs is an errorfully observed copy of the other. We introduce a corrupting channel model, and show that in this model framework, the solution to the graph matching problem is a maximum likelihood estimator. Necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency of this MLE are presented, as well as a relaxed notion of consistency in which a negligible fraction of the vertices need not be matched correctly. The results are used to study matchability in several families of random graphs, including edge independent models, random regular graphs and small-world networks. We also use these results to introduce measures of matching feasibility, and experimentally validate the results on simulated and real-world networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access