Paper detail

Bias-Variance Tradeoffs in Joint Spectral Embeddings

Joint spectral embeddings facilitate analysis of multiple network data by simultaneously mapping vertices in each network to points in Euclidean space where statistical inference is then performed. In this work, we consider one such joint embedding technique, the omnibus embedding of arXiv:1705.09355 , which has been successfully used for community detection, anomaly detection, and hypothesis testing tasks. To date the theoretical properties of this method have only been established under the strong assumption that the networks are conditionally i.i.d. random dot product graphs. Herein, we take a first step in characterizing the theoretical properties of the omnibus embedding in the presence of heterogeneous network data. Under a latent position model, we show the omnibus embedding implicitly regularizes its latent position estimates which induces a finite-sample bias-variance tradeoff for latent position estimation. We establish an explicit bias expression, derive a uniform concentration bound on the residual, and prove a central limit theorem characterizing the distributional properties of these estimates. These explicit bias and variance expressions enable us to state sufficient conditions for exact recovery in community detection tasks and develop a pivotal test statistic to determine whether two graphs share the same set of latent positions; demonstrating that accurate inference is achievable despite the estimator's inconsistency. These results are demonstrated in several experimental settings where statistical procedures utilizing the omnibus embedding are competitive, and oftentimes preferable, to comparable embedding techniques. These observations accentuate the viability of the omnibus embedding for multiple graph inference beyond the homogeneous network setting.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.