BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Csaba D. Tóth

Csaba D. Tóth contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational Geometrymath.CODiscrete Mathematicsmath.MG

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
13works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

13 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Noncrossing Longest Paths and Cycles

Edge crossings in geometric graphs are sometimes undesirable as they could lead to unwanted situations such as collisions in motion planning and inconsistency in VLSI layout. Short geometric structures such as shortest perfect matchings, shortest spanning trees, shortest spanning paths, and shortest spanning cycles on a given point set are inherently noncrossing. However, the longest such structures need not be noncrossing. In fact, it is intuitive to expect many edge crossings in various geometric graphs that are longest. Recently, Álvarez-Rebollar, Cravioto-Lagos, Marín, Solé-Pi, and Urrutia (Graphs and Combinatorics, 2024) constructed a set of points for which the longest perfect matching is noncrossing. They raised several challenging questions in this direction. In particular, they asked whether the longest spanning path, on any finite set of points in the plane, must have a pair of crossing edges. They also conjectured that the longest spanning cycle must have a pair of crossing edges. In this paper, we give a negative answer to the question and also refute the conjecture. We present a framework for constructing arbitrarily large point sets for which the longest perfect matchings, the longest spanning paths, and the longest spanning cycles are noncrossing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

On the Stretch Factor of Polygonal Chains

Let $P=(p_1, p_2, \dots, p_n)$ be a polygonal chain in $\mathbb{R}^d$. The stretch factor of $P$ is the ratio between the total length of $P$ and the distance of its endpoints, $\sum_{i = 1}^{n-1} |p_i p_{i+1}|/|p_1 p_n|$. For a parameter $c \geq 1$, we call $P$ a $c$-chain if $|p_ip_j|+|p_jp_k| \leq c|p_ip_k|$, for every triple $(i,j,k)$, $1 \leq i<j<k \leq n$. The stretch factor is a global property: it measures how close $P$ is to a straight line, and it involves all the vertices of $P$; being a $c$-chain, on the other hand, is a fingerprint-property: it only depends on subsets of $O(1)$ vertices of the chain. We investigate how the $c$-chain property influences the stretch factor in the plane: (i) we show that for every $\varepsilon > 0$, there is a noncrossing $c$-chain that has stretch factor $Ω(n^{1/2-\varepsilon})$, for sufficiently large constant $c=c(\varepsilon)$; (ii) on the other hand, the stretch factor of a $c$-chain $P$ is $O\left(n^{1/2}\right)$, for every constant $c\geq 1$, regardless of whether $P$ is crossing or noncrossing; and (iii) we give a randomized algorithm that can determine, for a polygonal chain $P$ in $\mathbb{R}^2$ with $n$ vertices, the minimum $c\geq 1$ for which $P$ is a $c$-chain in $O\left(n^{2.5}\ \mathrm{polylog}\ n\right)$ expected time and $O(n\log n)$ space. These results generalize to $\mathbb{R}^d$. For every dimension $d\geq 2$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, we construct a noncrossing $c$-chain that has stretch factor $Ω\left(n^{(1-\varepsilon)(d-1)/d}\right)$; on the other hand, the stretch factor of any $c$-chain is $O\left((n-1)^{(d-1)/d}\right)$; for every $c>1$, we can test whether an $n$-vertex chain in $\mathbb{R}^d$ is a $c$-chain in $O\left(n^{3-1/d}\ \mathrm{polylog}\ n\right)$ expected time and $O(n\log n)$ space.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Sparse Hop Spanners for Unit Disk Graphs

A unit disk graph $G$ on a given set $P$ of points in the plane is a geometric graph where an edge exists between two points $p,q \in P$ if and only if $|pq| \leq 1$. A spanning subgraph $G&#39;$ of $G$ is a $k$-hop spanner if and only if for every edge $pq\in G$, there is a path between $p,q$ in $G&#39;$ with at most $k$ edges. We obtain the following results for unit disk graphs in the plane. (I) Every $n$-vertex unit disk graph has a $5$-hop spanner with at most $5.5n$ edges. We analyze the family of spanners constructed by Biniaz (2020) and improve the upper bound on the number of edges from $9n$ to $5.5n$. (II) Using a new construction, we show that every $n$-vertex unit disk graph has a $3$-hop spanner with at most $11n$ edges. (III) Every $n$-vertex unit disk graph has a $2$-hop spanner with $O(n\log n)$ edges. This is the first nontrivial construction of $2$-hop spanners. (IV) For every sufficiently large positive integer $n$, there exists a set $P$ of $n$ points on a circle, such that every plane hop spanner on $P$ has hop stretch factor at least $4$. Previously, no lower bound greater than $2$ was known. (V) For every finite point set on a circle, there exists a plane (i.e., crossing-free) $4$-hop spanner. As such, this provides a tight bound for points on a circle. (VI) The maximum degree of $k$-hop spanners cannot be bounded from above by a function of $k$ for any positive integer $k$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Compatible Paths on Labelled Point Sets

Let $P$ and $Q$ be finite point sets of the same cardinality in $\mathbb{R}^2$, each labelled from $1$ to $n$. Two noncrossing geometric graphs $G_P$ and $G_Q$ spanning $P$ and $Q$, respectively, are called compatible if for every face $f$ in $G_P$, there exists a corresponding face in $G_Q$ with the same clockwise ordering of the vertices on its boundary as in $f$. In particular, $G_P$ and $G_Q$ must be straight-line embeddings of the same connected $n$-vertex graph. Deciding whether two labelled point sets admit compatible geometric paths is known to be NP-complete. We give polynomial-time algorithms to find compatible paths or report that none exist in three scenarios: $O(n)$ time for points in convex position; $O(n^2)$ time for two simple polygons, where the paths are restricted to remain inside the closed polygons; and $O(n^2 \log n)$ time for points in general position if the paths are restricted to be monotone.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Simple Topological Drawings of $k$-Planar Graphs

Every finite graph admits a \emph{simple (topological) drawing}, that is, a drawing where every pair of edges intersects in at most one point. However, in combination with other restrictions simple drawings do not universally exist. For instance, \emph{$k$-planar graphs} are those graphs that can be drawn so that every edge has at most $k$ crossings (i.e., they admit a \emph{$k$-plane drawing}). It is known that for $k\le 3$, every $k$-planar graph admits a $k$-plane simple drawing. But for $k\ge 4$, there exist $k$-planar graphs that do not admit a $k$-plane simple drawing. Answering a question by Schaefer, we show that there exists a function $f : \mathbb{N}\rightarrow\mathbb{N}$ such that every $k$-planar graph admits an $f(k)$-plane simple drawing, for all $k\in\mathbb{N}$. Note that the function $f$ depends on $k$ only and is independent of the size of the graph. Furthermore, we develop an algorithm to show that every $4$-planar graph admits an $8$-plane simple drawing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Transition Operations over Plane Trees

The operation of transforming one spanning tree into another by replacing an edge has been considered widely, both for general and planar straight-line graphs. For the latter, several variants have been studied (e.g., edge slides and edge rotations). In a transition graph on the set $\mathcal{T}(S)$ of noncrossing straight-line spanning trees on a finite point set $S$ in the plane, two spanning trees are connected by an edge if one can be transformed into the other by such an operation. We study bounds on the diameter of these graphs, and consider the various operations on point sets in both general position and convex position. In addition, we address variants of the problem where operations may be performed simultaneously or the edges are labeled. We prove new lower and upper bounds for the diameters of the corresponding transition graphs and pose open problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Universal Geometric Graphs

We introduce and study the problem of constructing geometric graphs that have few vertices and edges and that are universal for planar graphs or for some sub-class of planar graphs; a geometric graph is \emph{universal} for a class $\mathcal H$ of planar graphs if it contains an embedding, i.e., a crossing-free drawing, of every graph in $\mathcal H$. Our main result is that there exists a geometric graph with $n$ vertices and $O(n \log n)$ edges that is universal for $n$-vertex forests; this extends to the geometric setting a well-known graph-theoretic result by Chung and Graham, which states that there exists an $n$-vertex graph with $O(n \log n)$ edges that contains every $n$-vertex forest as a subgraph. Our $O(n \log n)$ bound on the number of edges cannot be improved, even if more than $n$ vertices are allowed. We also prove that, for every positive integer $h$, every $n$-vertex convex geometric graph that is universal for $n$-vertex outerplanar graphs has a near-quadratic number of edges, namely $Ω_h(n^{2-1/h})$; this almost matches the trivial $O(n^2)$ upper bound given by the $n$-vertex complete convex geometric graph. Finally, we prove that there exists an $n$-vertex convex geometric graph with $n$ vertices and $O(n \log n)$ edges that is universal for $n$-vertex caterpillars.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Simple $k$-Planar Graphs are Simple $(k+1)$-Quasiplanar

A simple topological graph is $k$-quasiplanar ($k\geq 2$) if it contains no $k$ pairwise crossing edges, and $k$-planar if no edge is crossed more than $k$ times. In this paper, we explore the relationship between $k$-planarity and $k$-quasiplanarity to show that, for $k \geq 2$, every $k$-planar simple topological graph can be transformed into a $(k+1)$-quasiplanar simple topological graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Packing anchored rectangles

Let $S$ be a set of $n$ points in the unit square $[0,1]^2$, one of which is the origin. We construct $n$ pairwise interior-disjoint axis-aligned empty rectangles such that the lower left corner of each rectangle is a point in $S$, and the rectangles jointly cover at least a positive constant area (about 0.09). This is a first step towards the solution of a longstanding conjecture that the rectangles in such a packing can jointly cover an area of at least 1/2.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Bounds on the maximum multiplicity of some common geometric graphs

We obtain new lower and upper bounds for the maximum multiplicity of some weighted and, respectively, non-weighted common geometric graphs drawn on n points in the plane in general position (with no three points collinear): perfect matchings, spanning trees, spanning cycles (tours), and triangulations. (i) We present a new lower bound construction for the maximum number of triangulations a set of n points in general position can have. In particular, we show that a generalized double chain formed by two almost convex chains admits Ω(8.65^n) different triangulations. This improves the bound Ω(8.48^n) achieved by the double zig-zag chain configuration studied by Aichholzer et al. (ii) We present a new lower bound of Ω(12.00^n) for the number of non-crossing spanning trees of the double chain composed of two convex chains. The previous bound, Ω(10.42^n), stood unchanged for more than 10 years. (iii) Using a recent upper bound of 30^n for the number of triangulations, due to Sharir and Sheffer, we show that n points in the plane in general position admit at most O(68.62^n) non-crossing spanning cycles. (iv) We derive lower bounds for the number of maximum and minimum weighted geometric graphs (matchings, spanning trees, and tours). We show that the number of shortest non-crossing tours can be exponential in n. Likewise, we show that both the number of longest non-crossing tours and the number of longest non-crossing perfect matchings can be exponential in n. Moreover, we show that there are sets of n points in convex position with an exponential number of longest non-crossing spanning trees. For points in convex position we obtain tight bounds for the number of longest and shortest tours. We give a combinatorial characterization of the longest tours, which leads to an O(nlog n) time algorithm for computing them.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Collinearities in Kinetic Point Sets

Let $P$ be a set of $n$ points in the plane, each point moving along a given trajectory. A {\em $k$-collinearity} is a pair $(L,t)$ of a line $L$ and a time $t$ such that $L$ contains at least $k$ points at time $t$, the points along $L$ do not all coincide, and not all of them are collinear at all times. We show that, if the points move with constant velocity, then the number of 3-collinearities is at most $2\binom{n}{3}$, and this bound is tight. There are $n$ points having $Ω(n^3/k^4 + n^2/k^2)$ distinct $k$-collinearities. Thus, the number of $k$-collinearities among $n$ points, for constant $k$, is $O(n^3)$, and this bound is asymptotically tight. In addition, there are $n$ points, moving in pairwise distinct directions with different speeds, such that no three points are ever collinear.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Long non-crossing configurations in the plane

We revisit several maximization problems for geometric networks design under the non-crossing constraint, first studied by Alon, Rajagopalan and Suri (ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, 1993). Given a set of $n$ points in the plane in general position (no three points collinear), compute a longest non-crossing configuration composed of straight line segments that is: (a) a matching (b) a Hamiltonian path (c) a spanning tree. Here we obtain new results for (b) and (c), as well as for the Hamiltonian cycle problem: (i) For the longest non-crossing Hamiltonian path problem, we give an approximation algorithm with ratio $\frac{2}{π+1} \approx 0.4829$. The previous best ratio, due to Alon et al., was $1/π\approx 0.3183$. Moreover, the ratio of our algorithm is close to $2/π$ on a relatively broad class of instances: for point sets whose perimeter (or diameter) is much shorter than the maximum length matching. The algorithm runs in $O(n^{7/3}\log{n})$ time. (ii) For the longest non-crossing spanning tree problem, we give an approximation algorithm with ratio 0.502 which runs in $O(n \log{n})$ time. The previous ratio, 1/2, due to Alon et al., was achieved by a quadratic time algorithm. Along the way, we first re-derive the result of Alon et al. with a faster $O(n \log{n})$-time algorithm and a very simple analysis. (iii) For the longest non-crossing Hamiltonian cycle problem, we give an approximation algorithm whose ratio is close to $2/π$ on a relatively broad class of instances: for point sets with the product $\bf{<}$diameter$\times$ convex hull size $\bf{>}$ much smaller than the maximum length matching. The algorithm runs in $O(n^{7/3}\log{n})$ time. No previous approximation results were known for this problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

New bounds on the average distance from the Fermat-Weber center of a planar convex body

The Fermat-Weber center of a planar body $Q$ is a point in the plane from which the average distance to the points in $Q$ is minimal. We first show that for any convex body $Q$ in the plane, the average distance from the Fermat-Weber center of $Q$ to the points of $Q$ is larger than ${1/6} \cdot Δ(Q)$, where $Δ(Q)$ is the diameter of $Q$. This proves a conjecture of Carmi, Har-Peled and Katz. From the other direction, we prove that the same average distance is at most $\frac{2(4-\sqrt3)}{13} \cdot Δ(Q) < 0.3490 \cdot Δ(Q)$. The new bound substantially improves the previous bound of $\frac{2}{3 \sqrt3} \cdot Δ(Q) \approx 0.3849 \cdot Δ(Q)$ due to Abu-Affash and Katz, and brings us closer to the conjectured value of ${1/3} \cdot Δ(Q)$. We also confirm the upper bound conjecture for centrally symmetric planar convex bodies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access