Paper detail

On the Total Perimeter of Homothetic Convex Bodies in a Convex Container

For two planar convex bodies, $C$ and $D$, consider a packing $S$ of $n$ positive homothets of $C$ contained in $D$. We estimate the total perimeter of the bodies in $S$, denoted ${\rm per}(S)$, in terms of ${\rm per}(D)$ and $n$. When all homothets of $C$ touch the boundary of the container $D$, we show that either ${\rm per}(S)=O(\log n)$ or ${\rm per}(S)=O(1)$, depending on how $C$ and $D$ "fit together," and these bounds are the best possible apart from the constant factors. Specifically, we establish an optimal bound ${\rm per}(S)=O(\log n)$ unless $D$ is a convex polygon and every side of $D$ is parallel to a corresponding segment on the boundary of $C$ (for short, $D$ is \emph{parallel to} $C$). When $D$ is parallel to $C$ but the homothets of $C$ may lie anywhere in $D$, we show that ${\rm per}(S)=O((1+{\rm esc}(S)) \log n/\log \log n)$, where ${\rm esc}(S)$ denotes the total distance of the bodies in $S$ from the boundary of $D$. Apart from the constant factor, this bound is also the best possible.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.