Abstract

We revisit several maximization problems for geometric networks design under the non-crossing constraint, first studied by Alon, Rajagopalan and Suri (ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, 1993). Given a set of nn points in the plane in general position (no three points collinear), compute a longest non-crossing configuration composed of straight line segments that is: (a) a matching (b) a Hamiltonian path (c) a spanning tree. Here we obtain new results for (b) and (c), as well as for the Hamiltonian cycle problem: (i) For the longest non-crossing Hamiltonian path problem, we give an approximation algorithm with ratio 2π+1≈0.4829\frac{2}{π+1} \approx 0.4829. The previous best ratio, due to Alon et al., was 1/π≈0.31831/π\approx 0.3183. Moreover, the ratio of our algorithm is close to 2/π2/π on a relatively broad class of instances: for point sets whose perimeter (or diameter) is much shorter than the maximum length matching. The algorithm runs in O(n7/3log⁡n)O(n^{7/3}\log{n}) time. (ii) For the longest non-crossing spanning tree problem, we give an approximation algorithm with ratio 0.502 which runs in O(nlog⁡n)O(n \log{n}) time. The previous ratio, 1/2, due to Alon et al., was achieved by a quadratic time algorithm. Along the way, we first re-derive the result of Alon et al. with a faster O(nlog⁡n)O(n \log{n})-time algorithm and a very simple analysis. (iii) For the longest non-crossing Hamiltonian cycle problem, we give an approximation algorithm whose ratio is close to 2/π2/π on a relatively broad class of instances: for point sets with the product <\bf{<}diameter×\times convex hull size >\bf{>} much smaller than the maximum length matching. The algorithm runs in O(n7/3log⁡n)O(n^{7/3}\log{n}) time. No previous approximation results were known for this problem.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.