BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Colin McQuillan

Colin McQuillan appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computational ComplexityDiscrete Mathematicsmath.CO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Boolean approximate counting CSPs with weak conservativity, and implications for ferromagnetic two-spin

We analyse the complexity of approximate counting constraint satisfactions problems $\mathrm{\#CSP}(\mathcal{F})$, where $\mathcal{F}$ is a set of nonnegative rational-valued functions of Boolean variables. A complete classification is known in the conservative case, where $\mathcal{F}$ is assumed to contain arbitrary unary functions. We strengthen this result by fixing any permissive strictly increasing unary function and any permissive strictly decreasing unary function, and adding only those to $\mathcal{F}$: this is weak conservativity. The resulting classification is employed to characterise the complexity of a wide range of two-spin problems, fully classifying the ferromagnetic case. In a further weakening of conservativity, we also consider what happens if only the pinning functions are assumed to be in $\mathcal{F}$ (instead of the two permissive unaries). We show that any set of functions for which pinning is not sufficient to recover the two kinds of permissive unaries must either have a very simple range, or must satisfy a certain monotonicity condition. We exhibit a non-trivial example of a set of functions satisfying the monotonicity condition.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Counting list matrix partitions of graphs

Given a symmetric D*D matrix M over {0,1,*}, a list M-partition of a graph G is a partition of G's vertices into D parts associated with the rows of M. The part of each vertex is chosen from a given list so that no edge of G maps to a 0 in M and no non-edge of G maps to a 1 in M. Many important graph-theoretic structures can be represented as list M-partitions, such as graph colourings, split graphs and homogeneous sets and pairs, which arise in the proofs of the weak and strong perfect graph conjectures. There has been quite a bit of work on determining for which matrices M computations involving list M-partitions are tractable. We focus on counting list M-partitions, given a graph G and a list for each vertex of G. We identify a set of "tractable" matrices and give an algorithm that counts list M-partitions in polynomial time for every (fixed) matrix M in this set. The algorithm uses data structures such as sparse-dense partitions and subcube decompositions to reduce each instance to a sequence of instances in which the lists restrict access to portions of M in which the interaction of 0s and 1s is controlled. We solve the resulting restricted instances by converting them into counting constraint satisfaction problems (#CSPs) which we solve using arc-consistency. For every matrix M for which our algorithm fails, we show that counting list M-partitions is #P-complete. Further, we give an explicit characterisation of the dichotomy theorem: counting list M-partitions is in FP if M has a structure called a derectangularising sequence; otherwise, counting list M-partitions is #P-hard. We show that the meta-problem of determining whether a given matrix has a derectangularising sequence is NP-complete. Finally, we show that lists can be used to encode cardinality restrictions in M-partitions problems and use this to give a polynomial-time algorithm for counting homogeneous pairs in graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Approximating the partition function of planar two-state spin systems

We consider the problem of approximating the partition function of the hard-core model on planar graphs of degree at most 4. We show that when the activity lambda is sufficiently large, there is no fully polynomial randomised approximation scheme for evaluating the partition function unless NP=RP. The result extends to a nearby region of the parameter space in a more general two-state spin system with three parameters. We also give a polynomial-time randomised approximation scheme for the logarithm of the partition function.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The complexity of approximating conservative counting CSPs

We study the complexity of approximately solving the weighted counting constraint satisfaction problem #CSP(F). In the conservative case, where F contains all unary functions, there is a classification known for the case in which the domain of functions in F is Boolean. In this paper, we give a classification for the more general problem where functions in F have an arbitrary finite domain. We define the notions of weak log-modularity and weak log-supermodularity. We show that if F is weakly log-modular, then #CSP(F)is in FP. Otherwise, it is at least as difficult to approximate as #BIS, the problem of counting independent sets in bipartite graphs. #BIS is complete with respect to approximation-preserving reductions for a logically-defined complexity class #RHPi1, and is believed to be intractable. We further sub-divide the #BIS-hard case. If F is weakly log-supermodular, then we show that #CSP(F) is as easy as a (Boolean) log-supermodular weighted #CSP. Otherwise, we show that it is NP-hard to approximate. Finally, we give a full trichotomy for the arity-2 case, where #CSP(F) is in FP, or is #BIS-equivalent, or is equivalent in difficulty to #SAT, the problem of approximately counting the satisfying assignments of a Boolean formula in conjunctive normal form. We also discuss the algorithmic aspects of our classification.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Approximating Holant problems by winding

We give an FPRAS for Holant problems with parity constraints and not-all-equal constraints, a generalisation of the problem of counting sink-free-orientations. The approach combines a sampler for near-assignments of "windable" functions -- using the cycle-unwinding canonical paths technique of Jerrum and Sinclair -- with a bound on the weight of near-assignments. The proof generalises to a larger class of Holant problems; we characterise this class and show that it cannot be extended by expressibility reductions. We then ask whether windability is equivalent to expressibility by matchings circuits (an analogue of matchgates), and give a positive answer for functions of arity three.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Degree two approximate Boolean #CSPs with variable weights

A counting constraint satisfaction problem (#CSP) asks for the number of ways to satisfy a given list of constraints, drawn from a fixed constraint language Γ. We study how hard it is to evaluate this number approximately. There is an interesting partial classification, due to Dyer, Goldberg, Jalsenius and Richerby, of Boolean constraint languages when the degree of instances is bounded by d>=3 - every variable appears in at most d constraints - under the assumption that "pinning" is allowed as part of the instance. We study the d=2 case under the stronger assumption that "variable weights" are allowed as part of the instance. We give a dichotomy: in each case, either the #CSP is tractable, or one of two important open problems, #BIS or #PM, reduces to the #CSP.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The expressibility of functions on the Boolean domain, with applications to Counting CSPs

An important tool in the study of the complexity of Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) is the notion of a relational clone, which is the set of all relations expressible using primitive positive formulas over a particular set of base relations. Post's lattice gives a complete classification of all Boolean relational clones, and this has been used to classify the computational difficulty of CSPs. Motivated by a desire to understand the computational complexity of (weighted) counting CSPs, we develop an analogous notion of functional clones and study the landscape of these clones. One of these clones is the collection of log-supermodular (lsm) functions, which turns out to play a significant role in classifying counting CSPs. In the conservative case (where all nonnegative unary functions are available), we show that there are no functional clones lying strictly between the clone of lsm functions and the total clone (containing all functions). Thus, any counting CSP that contains a single nontrivial non-lsm function is computationally as hard to approximate as any problem in #P. Furthermore, we show that any non-trivial functional clone (in a sense that will be made precise) contains the binary function "implies". As a consequence, in the conservative case, all non-trivial counting CSPs are as hard as #BIS, the problem of counting independent sets in a bipartite graph. Given the complexity-theoretic results, it is natural to ask whether the "implies" clone is equivalent to the clone of lsm functions. We use the Mobius transform and the Fourier transform to show that these clones coincide precisely up to arity 3. It is an intriguing open question whether the lsm clone is finitely generated. Finally, we investigate functional clones in which only restricted classes of unary functions are available.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access